Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26
Send Topic Print
SOBs unjustified prejudice (Read 56598 times)
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #90 - Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49308
At my desk.
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #91 - Aug 7th, 2012 at 6:42pm
 
Quote:
I just point out that they are all equally as bad because you pick on 1 above the others and hypocritically dont admit your own religion is the same.


What about the truth spot? Abu wants the death penalty for apostasy. I don't. Abu wants to destroy democracy. I don't. Abu wants to destroy freedom of religion. I don't. Abu wants to destroy women's rights. I don't. You are so hung up on your 'all religions are equal' BS that you have to constantly discard reality to defend your position. You are more concerned about insisting that all religions are equal than you are about the actual threat posed by religion to people's political freedom. You have it so far backwards that you end up defending the very people who want to take your freedom away.

Quote:
you want to restrict muslim women wearing hijabs but dont want to stop xtians knocking on ppls doors and bothering them.


Again spot, try sticking to the truth. When I quote you directly, you whinge that this is some kind of deliberate misrepresentation. Yet you make up complete BS about me.

Quote:
Hahahahahaha! A lil projection from the king of twisting and turning and quoting out of context . . . .


No spot. That is what you actually do. I quote you directly. You say that is misrepresentation. You make stuff up about me. I quote Abu directly for you. You choose not to believe that either.

Quote:
They arent doing this in australia


Yes they are spot. Right here on this board. I quoted Abu for you. You refused to believe it.

Quote:
religions dont pay tax why should they have a say?


Religions do not pay tax. Political ideologies do not pay tax. Sexual preferences do not pay tax. People pay tax spot. People have a say. It's that simple.

Quote:
how do you decide which sect of which religion should dictate the rules?


Spot, Abu is the only one here who actually believes that one religious sect should dictate the rules. That is the only example you have of this actually happening, and you refuse to believe what is right in front of your eyes.

Quote:
that is what i have been saying all along that organised religion should stay out of politics.


So how do you expect to achieve this if you run away every time you see someone promoting it? Organised religion has a tight grip on political power over a big chunk of the world. Australians are dying in an attempt to wrest it from them. All you can do in response is cover your ears and chant your silly little mantras about all religions being equal.

Quote:
Gay groups dont call themselves charities.


Plenty do spot. Again, denying reality is no way to win an argument.

Quote:
i obviously meant religious organisations as i pointed out before freediver.


That was quantum. See if you can spot the difference.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49308
At my desk.
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #92 - Aug 7th, 2012 at 6:47pm
 
So how much sense does this make - spot believes that religions are all equally bad. He completely ignores the bad part and harps on about the equal part -  so much so that when he actually comes across a person who wants to do all the worst things he attributes to religion, he defends that person and attacks all the people who want to protect freedom and democracy. He refuses to believe what is right in front of him. He openly rejects reality and replaces it with his own - all so that he can go on claiming that all religions are equally bad.

Sometimes I think he would happily sacrifice freedom, democracy etc in his quest against 'all religion'.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #93 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 5:59am
 
Soren wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.



How is it different? They are human? They are adults? They dont affect you in any way?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #94 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 6:19am
 
Ugggh I just spent 1/2 an hour answering the wrong post in the wrong thread.

Quote:
Abu wants the death penalty for apostasy.


He says he doesnt. Why cant you accept what he says? and why the heck do you keep hassling me about abu? i don't speak for him and he is just 1 muslim.

Quote:
What about the truth spot?


i dont think it means what you think it means.

Quote:
You are more concerned about insisting that all religions are equal


all religions are equally absurd. in australia they are not equal though. The xtians have all the "power".

Quote:
When I quote you directly, you blah blah


well by "you" i meant "you ppl" religious nuts  . . . .

Quote:
Yes they are spot. Right here on this board. I quoted Abu for you. You refused to believe it.


Why would i believe you? Abu answered my questions. I wouldn't mind talking to him more but i cant in this environment because you will try to make me explain everything he says.

Quote:
Religions do not pay tax. Political ideologies do not pay tax. Sexual preferences do not pay tax. People pay tax spot. People have a say. It's that simple.


See? you completely ignored where I said i was talking about religious organisations. Any other for profit organisations DO pay tax.

Quote:
Spot, Abu is the only one here who actually believes that one religious sect should dictate the rules. That is the only example you have of this actually happening, and you refuse to believe what is right in front of your eyes.


Obviously i was talking about the religions generally there. Of course you knew that but decided to pretend I was talking about abu again.

Quote:
So how do you expect to achieve this if you run away every time you see someone promoting it?


What the heck are you talking about there? You have no idea what i do in real life.

Quote:
Plenty do spot. Again, denying reality is no way to win an argument.


They do? Got a link?

Quote:
That was quantum. See if you can spot the difference.


Theres no difference except for the obvious lack of adminship to he can be more abusive than you can be with your label.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #95 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 6:22am
 
freediver wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 6:47pm:
So how much sense does this make - spot believes that religions are all equally bad. He completely ignores the bad part and harps on about the equal part -  so much so that when he actually comes across a person who wants to do all the worst things he attributes to religion, he defends that person and attacks all the people who want to protect freedom and democracy. He refuses to believe what is right in front of him. He openly rejects reality and replaces it with his own - all so that he can go on claiming that all religions are equally bad.

Sometimes I think he would happily sacrifice freedom, democracy etc in his quest against 'all religion'.


Equally "absurd" <--------------

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49308
At my desk.
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #96 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 8:50am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 6:19am:
Quote:
Abu wants the death penalty for apostasy.


He says he doesnt. Why cant you accept what he says?


Spot, making up silly excuses for not answering the question is not the same as saying whatever it is you think he said. You are the only one who has outright refused to believe what you see when confronted with a direct quote from me. This is what a straight answer looks like:

freediver wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
abu_rashid wrote on Oct 9th, 2008 at 7:44pm:
Quote:
What is that again? I think there was some abiguity last time we touched on that.


Not from me, perhaps with Malik. Apostasy is a capital offense.



Quote:
Why would i believe you? Abu answered my questions.

Because I quoted Abu where he did give a straight answer and and he did not actually answer your questions.

Quote:
Obviously i was talking about the religions generally there.


Yes spot, I have noticed that you refuse to discuss religions specifically when it concerns Islam. You run and hide.

Quote:
Equally "absurd" <--------------


Spot, to what extent would you be willing to undermine democracy and freedom in your quest against "all religion"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #97 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 9:30am
 
Hey - you ask and ask and ask and you dont answer questions. How about providing that link?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40764
Gender: male
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #98 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 10:04am
 

7 pages.

SOB has gone from "prejudiced" to "obsessed"
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #99 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 10:05am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 5:59am:
Soren wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.



How is it different? They are human? They are adults? They dont affect you in any way?

SOB


This book has all the answers you seek....

http://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-I-Come-From/dp/0818402539
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #100 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:14am
 
... wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 10:05am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 5:59am:
Soren wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.



How is it different? They are human? They are adults? They dont affect you in any way?

SOB


This book has all the answers you seek....

http://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-I-Come-From/dp/0818402539


Doesnt answer my question. How does it effect you in any way?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Quantum
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3373
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #101 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:36am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 6:19am:
Quote:
That was quantum. See if you can spot the difference.


Theres no difference except for the obvious lack of adminship to he can be more abusive than you can be with your label.

SOB


You are actually a fairly offensive person spot, you just don't realize it. You accuse people of being liars, misquoting and misrepresenting, of being brain washed, stupid, of being socks, and being bigots, etc... and that's to people who are being polite to you. When they have had enough of it and stand their ground, you then whine like a baby that people are abusive or picking on you. If you can't take it stop dishing it out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #102 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:42am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:14am:
... wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 10:05am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 5:59am:
Soren wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.



How is it different? They are human? They are adults? They dont affect you in any way?

SOB


This book has all the answers you seek....

http://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-I-Come-From/dp/0818402539


Doesnt answer my question. How does it effect you in any way?

SOB



You asked "how is it different?"
The book will explain how. 
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #103 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:50am
 
... wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:42am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:14am:
... wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 10:05am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 5:59am:
Soren wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 4:52pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:33pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:27pm:
... wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 3:16pm:
So you're sticking with "consent" then.

OK.  Lets say an 18 year old bloke consented to marrying his mother.

All good then? 


Thats bigamy but you are just being a dick. Theres fantastical and theres realistic. Realistic is human consenting adult with differing sexual preferences marrying. Incest is not a sexual preference since it has nothing to do with gender.

SOB



Ummm no bigamy is being married to 2 people.

Speaking of which...why shouldn't people be allowed to marry 2, 3 or even 10 people, assuming all parties consent?

It's not your place to dictate what is "realistic" and what isn't.  If that boy loves his mama and wants to marry her, on what grounds do you deny them?  Consent is all it takes remember? 


Obviously you dont know the difference between reasonable and unreasonable and you still havent figured out what consent means either - im surprised you arent in jail.

seriously what the frig does any of this ridiculous crap you are bringing up have to do with gays?

SOB



It's to do with your ridiculous assertion that two arse bandits or two muff divers marrying each other is no different to a man and a woman marrying each other.



How is it different? They are human? They are adults? They dont affect you in any way?

SOB


This book has all the answers you seek....

http://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-I-Come-From/dp/0818402539


Doesnt answer my question. How does it effect you in any way?

SOB



You asked "how is it different?"
The book will explain how. 


Explain how it effects you in any way if gays get married.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia
Re: SOBs unjustified prejudice
Reply #104 - Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:52am
 
Quantum wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 11:36am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 6:19am:
Quote:
That was quantum. See if you can spot the difference.


Theres no difference except for the obvious lack of adminship to he can be more abusive than you can be with your label.

SOB


You are actually a fairly offensive person spot, you just don't realize it. You accuse people of being liars, misquoting and misrepresenting, of being brain washed, stupid, of being socks, and being bigots, etc... and that's to people who are being polite to you. When they have had enough of it and stand their ground, you then whine like a baby that people are abusive or picking on you. If you can't take it stop dishing it out.


In defence.

Only people i have accused of being liars and misquoting are the lying misquoters.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26
Send Topic Print