IQSRLOW wrote on May 9
th, 2014 at 11:28pm:
If you are unaware of the temperature record that there has been no significant warming for nearly 18 years, then I'm afraid pointing out where you are wrong would be pointless.
So - are you only referring to the surface temperature? And the fact that there was an anomalously high surface temperature in 1998 due to the El Nino of that year?
Yes - I am aware of that. But the claim was that there has been no
global warming for 18 years - which is of course - complete bollocks. There global temperature is far more than just the surface temperature.
That is why:
The arctic continues to melt
Sea levels continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance continues to decline
You are talking bollocks. And your inability to provide any evidence to support your bollocks, implies that you also know you are talking bollocks.
You are telling lies.
IQSRLOW wrote on May 9
th, 2014 at 11:28pm:
You haven't educated yourself enough regarding the science and deny the current situation.
You are the one telling lies buddy.
I told you:
The arctic continues to melt
Sea levels continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance continues to decline
You told me I was wrong on all three counts. I showed you evidence that backed up my statement.
What have you got liar?
IQSRLOW wrote on May 9
th, 2014 at 11:28pm:
I cannot convince a denier and someone with 'faith' on AGW because your mind is closed to the truth. Your belief outweighs the science and reality.
You are the one in denial buddy
I told you:
The arctic continues to melt
Sea levels continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance continues to decline
You told me I was wrong on all three counts. I showed you evidence that backed up my statement.
What have you got liar?
IQSRLOW wrote on May 9
th, 2014 at 11:28pm:
If you were truly across this issue,you would already know about the hiatus in the warming, but you don't so all that tells me is that you deny the empirical evidence for anecdotal observations that support your fanatical religion but have nothing to do with the halt in temperature despite massive increases in CO2 output.
If you have any idea what you were talking about - you would know that there is more to the planets heat content than simply the surface temperature.
But you don't You are ignorant, and believe whatever Bolty tells you.
The SIMPLE FACT is - that is , as has been observed:
The arctic continues to melt
Sea levels continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance continues to decline
Then the planet is warming.
If the planet was not continuing to warm:
The arctic would not continue to melt
Sea levels would not continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance would not continue to decline
And even surface temperature, which you seem to want to cherry pick - average global surface temperatures have had a positive anomaly over long term average over all of the past decade. This means the planet is warming.
Yes - I know an opinion piece by David Rose in the Daily Mail told you different (that is where all this "no warming" crap originated) - but you are wrong. David Rose is wrong. Andrew Bolt is wrong.
IQSRLOW wrote on May 9
th, 2014 at 11:28pm:
Please, continue with your denial. It is amusing to watch a denier, denying and ignoring the science and evidence.
Let me know when you have educated yourself regarding the state of AGW and the scientific proof of the hiatus. If you are not willing to do that, then there is no point in trying to challenge your religion with facts and science.
Do yourself a favour champ.
Have a think about where this planet stores heat. THink about the oceans. Think about the cryosphere. Think about the atmosphere. And then come back to us and tell us why you want to measure global warming only by the temperature at the earth's surface.
And then explain to us why:
The arctic continues to melt
Sea levels continue to rise, and
Global glacial mass balance continues to decline
If - as you claim - there has been "no warming for 18 years".
Could you do that?
And perhaps try to provide some evidence to support your opinion. Could you do that?