Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The social contract between capital and labour. (Read 3851 times)
Mnemonic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1530
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The social contract between capital and labour.
Reply #30 - Aug 12th, 2012 at 9:37pm
 
gold_medal wrote on Aug 12th, 2012 at 8:42am:
he was #1 for over 18months - longer than almost everyone else before or after him. Your point may be valid but your example is sorta an example of the opposite.


What about Roger Federer? Hasn't he been on top the longest?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74932
Gender: male
Re: The social contract between capital and labour.
Reply #31 - Aug 12th, 2012 at 9:45pm
 
Mnemonic wrote on Aug 11th, 2012 at 9:40pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 11th, 2012 at 9:18pm:
your doing no such thing ... to just repeat the same crap on every thread, makes you look like some crazy looney who is going senile ...

apart from the fact that you've been saying it for so long and yet not done it, that makes you look like you're either full of shyte or a coward


is this guy a newbie ......... oh no, 4000 posts!!!! 10 times more than me.

Surely this wasn't just a recent development was it? If it was only the last 20 posts that's fine.


I'm not keeping count but for at least what seems the last 2 or 3 months just about every single post he puts up is the same crap ... he should either try to sue the government or shut up about it ... if he has an opinion I'd like to hear it, but 'Í'm gonna sue the bastards' is not an opinion, it's a rant.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: The social contract between capital and labour.
Reply #32 - Aug 13th, 2012 at 1:18pm
 
Mnemonic wrote on Aug 12th, 2012 at 9:37pm:
gold_medal wrote on Aug 12th, 2012 at 8:42am:
he was #1 for over 18months - longer than almost everyone else before or after him. Your point may be valid but your example is sorta an example of the opposite.


What about Roger Federer? Hasn't he been on top the longest?


Im not sure but my point was that Hewitt was #1 for 18months which is way longer than most do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print