Australian Politics Forum - Same sex marriage

rabbitoh07 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2783 Gender:	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #135 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:21pm Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 5:51pm: Under the meaning of the constitution, do not believe that Homosexuals meet the test of freemen with all of the same rights and privileges of citizens... I think you will need to quote the relevant section of the Constitutions for us too. THanks
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #136 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:25pm skippy. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:48pm: don't worry about the magna carta, the church says homosexuality is abdominal, unless it is between a priest and a boy. It's more posterior than abdominal.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

lisa.greek Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1595 Cairns QLD	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #137 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:27pm muso wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:25pm: skippy. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:48pm: don't worry about the magna carta, the church says homosexuality is abdominal, unless it is between a priest and a boy. It's more posterior than abdominal. depends if one is a top, bottom or versatile
Back to top	IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #138 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:31pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:21pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 5:51pm:

Under the meaning of the constitution, do not believe that Homosexuals meet the test of freemen with all of the same rights and privileges of citizens...

I think you will need to quote the relevant section of the Constitutions for us too.

THanks

It is beneath my learned dignity to cast pearls before swine - the constitution is something you neither believe in nor comprehend so how could you claim to be protected by it?

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

Prevailing Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7169 Stop Men	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #139 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:33pm The constitution protects and frees only those citizens covenanted by it..
Back to top	I condemn Male Violence Against Women The Government Supports Gynocide There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 34691 Gender:	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #140 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:37pm muso wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:25pm: skippy. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:48pm: don't worry about the magna carta, the church says homosexuality is abdominal, unless it is between a priest and a boy. It's more posterior than abdominal. once saw gonorhea in a colostomy stoma, so it may be possible
Back to top	IP Logged

Prevailing Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7169 Stop Men	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #141 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...
Back to top	I condemn Male Violence Against Women The Government Supports Gynocide There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #142 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:57pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:37pm:

muso wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:25pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:48pm:

don't worry about the magna carta, the church says homosexuality is abdominal, unless it is between a priest and a boy.

It's more posterior than abdominal.

once saw gonorhea in a colostomy stoma, so it may be possible

Of course, it's just possible that Skippy may have meant, the church says Homosexuality is Abominale, unless it's between a priest & an alter boy or any boy for that matter, in which case, it seems quite ok?

Back to top

IP Logged

perceptions_now Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11694 Perth WA Gender:	Re: Same sex marriage Reply #143 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm: Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law... So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going? And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?
Back to top	IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #144 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:02pm

muso wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:25pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 1:48pm:

don't worry about the magna carta, the church says homosexuality is abdominal, unless it is between a priest and a boy.

It's more posterior than abdominal.

OH LOL I wrote that with my I phone and didn't even notice , that bloody auto spell checker throws up some classics. Grin

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #145 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:19pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...

So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going?

And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?

The constitution cannot be changed apart from a referendum of freemen - clearly anyone who holds to social or international law does not qualify as a freeman or as a citizen covenanted under the constitution with an entitlement to vote or sit in the parliament lawfully...

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #146 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:22pm

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...

So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going?

And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?

The constitution cannot be changed apart from a referendum of freemen - clearly anyone who holds to social or international law does not qualify as a freeman or as a citizen covenanted under the constitution with an entitlement to vote or sit in the parliament lawfully...

Ooooh! Do you know where we can find some free men! Post there details here! Pics too please!

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #147 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:48pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:22pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...

So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going?

And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?

The constitution cannot be changed apart from a referendum of freemen - clearly anyone who holds to social or international law does not qualify as a freeman or as a citizen covenanted under the constitution with an entitlement to vote or sit in the parliament lawfully...

Ooooh! Do you know where we can find some free men! Post there details here! Pics too please!

There are aspects of the constitution relating to the rights of freemen in the constitution which are "Forever" and cannot be changed or repealed...these include territorial and economic rights, the right to life, the right to defend yourself ect...Only people who have covenented with the constitution have those rights...you can hardly have those rights if you are not a "Subject"... Grin

Freedom of the church is also an eternal constitutional right...

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 13^th, 2012 at 9:00pm by Prevailing »

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #148 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 9:51pm

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:22pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...

So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going?

And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?

The constitution cannot be changed apart from a referendum of freemen - clearly anyone who holds to social or international law does not qualify as a freeman or as a citizen covenanted under the constitution with an entitlement to vote or sit in the parliament lawfully...

Ooooh! Do you know where we can find some free men! Post there details here! Pics too please!

There are aspects of the constitution relating to the rights of freemen in the constitution which are "Forever" and cannot be changed or repealed...these include territorial and economic rights, the right to life, the right to defend yourself ect...Only people who have covenented with the constitution have those rights...you can hardly have those rights if you are not a "Subject"... Grin

Freedom of the church is also an eternal constitutional right...

There's the good news & there's the bad news.

The good news is the Church's Constitutional rights are no more eternal, than are my rights and the rights of every other person in a true Democracy!

The bad news is, there is no true Democracy!

And, in the it's "not the nine oclock news", voters change the Constitution and save Democracy from itself"!!!

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: Same sex marriage
Reply #149 - Aug 13^th, 2012 at 10:39pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:22pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 8:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 7:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Aug 13^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Social law and international law, is invalid and carries no weight conflicting with constitutional law...

So, how far back in Constitutional law are we going?

And, if the Constitution gets changed, then its all ok, Right?

The constitution cannot be changed apart from a referendum of freemen - clearly anyone who holds to social or international law does not qualify as a freeman or as a citizen covenanted under the constitution with an entitlement to vote or sit in the parliament lawfully...

Ooooh! Do you know where we can find some free men! Post there details here! Pics too please!

There are aspects of the constitution relating to the rights of freemen in the constitution which are "Forever" and cannot be changed or repealed...these include territorial and economic rights, the right to life, the right to defend yourself ect...Only people who have covenented with the constitution have those rights...you can hardly have those rights if you are not a "Subject"... Grin

Freedom of the church is also an eternal constitutional right...

There's the good news & there's the bad news.

The good news is the Church's Constitutional rights are no more eternal, than are my rights and the rights of every other person in a true Democracy!

The bad news is, there is no true Democracy!

And, in the it's "not the nine oclock news", voters change the Constitution and save Democracy from itself"!!!

I am sorry, but you are ignorant, uneducated and unable to give an informed opinion on the timeless covenant nature of the constitution and law we are under. You confuse your ideological beliefs with the Law itself...

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged