Australian Politics Forum - Win/win Solution

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #15 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:15pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:08pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

they did no such thing . try reading the report before commenting

in effect, that is EXACTLY what they said. They came up with recomendations which is essentially rejecting the Malaysia solution and accepting Abbots policy which is effectively Howards Solution.

they did not, if you'd bothered to read beyond the headlines and read the report you would see that they found that the Malaysia solution is in fact a good idea ... it just needs a little tweaking ... and there was no mention of TPV's ....

Oh the semantics.

What they surely did say was that Rudd/Gillard/Greens/Ind got it wrong.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #16 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 6:28pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:08pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

they did no such thing . try reading the report before commenting

in effect, that is EXACTLY what they said. They came up with recomendations which is essentially rejecting the Malaysia solution and accepting Abbots policy which is effectively Howards Solution.

they did not, if you'd bothered to read beyond the headlines and read the report you would see that they found that the Malaysia solution is in fact a good idea ... it just needs a little tweaking ... and there was no mention of TPV's ....

...also that aside from the destinations, there is VERY LITTLE which is similar between this and the Pacific Solution and is, in any case, recommended only as a TEMPORARY measure while regional centres are worked out.

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #17 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:43pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:08pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

they did no such thing . try reading the report before commenting

in effect, that is EXACTLY what they said. They came up with recomendations which is essentially rejecting the Malaysia solution and accepting Abbots policy which is effectively Howards Solution.

they did not, if you'd bothered to read beyond the headlines and read the report you would see that they found that the Malaysia solution is in fact a good idea ... it just needs a little tweaking ... and there was no mention of TPV's ....

Actually they said it wasnt good enough - which is what everyone has been saying. And there is currently no plan to use Malaysia for just that reason. Get over it. You and Gillard are the only ones thinking Malyasia was a good idea. It was just another amteur labor policy, doomed to failure and self-implosion on a spectacular level.

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 26267 Gender:	Re: Win/win Solution Reply #18 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:56pm progressiveslol wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:00am: sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am: What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's? Apparently it means a win for labor/gillard Sounds like the same logic of Greens_Lose...
Back to top	IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #19 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:48pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:56pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:00am:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

Apparently it means a win for labor/gillard Cheesy

Sounds like the same logic of Greens_Lose...

Which is itself the quintessence of anti-logic.

Back to top

IP Logged

sexy_beast

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 575
Gender: male

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #20 - Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:50pm

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:48pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:56pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 10:00am:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

Apparently it means a win for labor/gillard Cheesy

Sounds like the same logic of Greens_Lose...

Which is itself the quintessence of anti-logic.

Who is Greens_lose?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75058
Gender: male

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #21 - Aug 15^th, 2012 at 9:09am

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:08pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

they did no such thing . try reading the report before commenting

in effect, that is EXACTLY what they said. They came up with recomendations which is essentially rejecting the Malaysia solution and accepting Abbots policy which is effectively Howards Solution.

they did not, if you'd bothered to read beyond the headlines and read the report you would see that they found that the Malaysia solution is in fact a good idea ... it just needs a little tweaking ... and there was no mention of TPV's ....

Actually they said it wasnt good enough - which is what everyone has been saying. And there is currently no plan to use Malaysia for just that reason. Get over it. You and Gillard are the only ones thinking Malyasia was a good idea. It was just another amteur labor policy, doomed to failure and self-implosion on a spectacular level.

once again fools gold just makes it up as he goes ...

The Panel recommends that Australia continue to develop its vitally important cooperation with Malaysia on asylum issues, including the management of a substantial number of refugees to be taken annually from Malaysia

http://expertpanelonasylumseekers.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/media_releases...

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Win/win Solution
Reply #22 - Aug 15^th, 2012 at 4:17pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 15^th, 2012 at 9:09am:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:08pm:

gold_medal wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

sexy_beast wrote on Aug 14^th, 2012 at 9:50am:

What about the fact that Gillard's own appointed comittee approved of the Coalition's policy, and rejected her's?

they did no such thing . try reading the report before commenting

in effect, that is EXACTLY what they said. They came up with recomendations which is essentially rejecting the Malaysia solution and accepting Abbots policy which is effectively Howards Solution.

they did not, if you'd bothered to read beyond the headlines and read the report you would see that they found that the Malaysia solution is in fact a good idea ... it just needs a little tweaking ... and there was no mention of TPV's ....

Actually they said it wasnt good enough - which is what everyone has been saying. And there is currently no plan to use Malaysia for just that reason. Get over it. You and Gillard are the only ones thinking Malyasia was a good idea. It was just another amteur labor policy, doomed to failure and self-implosion on a spectacular level.

once again fools gold just makes it up as he goes ...

The Panel recommends that Australia continue to develop its vitally important cooperation with Malaysia on asylum issues, including the management of a substantial number of refugees to be taken annually from Malaysia

http://expertpanelonasylumseekers.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/media_releases...

bureaucratic-speak for 'it aint good enough yet so keep working until it is acceptable'

Back to top

IP Logged