Australian Politics Forum - If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?

Upton Sinclair Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 496	If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing? Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat???? http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php
Back to top	"I am not asking the Australian people to take me on trust, but on the record of a lifetime," --Tony Abbott IP Logged

rules_of_the_game New Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 24 Gender:	Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing? Reply #1 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:06pm Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm: poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat???? Someone has been let out of the asylum prematurely. You must be a Greenie. it shows!
Back to top	IP Logged

Sir lastnail

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30111
Gender: male

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #2 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:08pm

Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat????

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php

To become a member of the liberal party it's a prerequisite that you join up with the flat earthers Wink

Back to top

In August 2021, Newcastle Coroner Karen Dilks recorded that Lisa Shaw had died “due to complications of an AstraZeneca COVID vaccination”.

IP Logged

Upton Sinclair

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 496

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #3 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:12pm

rules_of_the_game wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:06pm:

Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat????

Someone has been let out of the asylum prematurely. You must be a Greenie. it shows!

I believe in facts. Like you

Back to top

"I am not asking the Australian people to take me on trust, but on the record of a lifetime,"
--Tony Abbott

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing? Reply #4 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:16pm Religion only works when you destroy science!!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #5 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:24pm

rules_of_the_game wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:06pm:

Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat????

Someone has been let out of the asylum prematurely. You must be a Greenie. it shows!

What makes you think you are smarter than the scientists?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:32pm by MOTR »

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

rules_of_the_game

New Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 24
Gender: male

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #6 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:34pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:24pm:

rules_of_the_game wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:06pm:

Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat????

Someone has been let out of the asylum prematurely. You must be a Greenie. it shows!

What makes you think you are smarter than the scientists?

That was a bit of a giant leap in logic there, wasnt it? I was criticsing the somewhat ludicrous and infantile correlation of events in the OP. And so should you.

Now if you want to debate actual science, then go right ahead. But you might want to move the thread out of the day-care pattern first.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing? Reply #7 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:42pm So you accept AGW. Sorry, I thought you were another nutter who thought it was some sort of gigantic conspiracy. Sorry about that.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #8 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 6:42am

Sir lastnail wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:08pm:

Upton Sinclair wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

poo, if they can fake AGW then why not fake the fact the Earth is round? Maybe AGW is a fraud, the moon landings were faked, and the world is really flat????

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php

To become a member of the liberal party it's a prerequisite that you join up with the flat earthers Wink

Flat earthers are like AGW'rs. They just cant seem to prove their hypothesis.

Back to top

IP Logged

Upton Sinclair

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 496

Re: If NASA can fake AGW, why not moon landing?
Reply #9 - Sep 8^th, 2012 at 12:04pm

I swear, I hadn't seen this when I posted this thread Grin

From Stephen Lewandowsky of University of WA

NASA faked the moon landing|Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax:
An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science

Quote:

Abstract
Although nearly all domain experts agree that human CO2 emissions are altering the world's climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence. Internet blogs have become a vocal platform for climate denial, and bloggers have taken a prominent and influential role in questioning climate science. We report a survey (N > 1100) of climate blog users to identify the variables underlying acceptance and rejection of climate science. Paralleling previous work, we found that endorsement of a laissez-faire conception of free-market economics predicts rejection of climate science (r:80 between latent constructs). Endorsement of the free market also predicted the rejection of other established scientic ndings, such as the facts that HIV causes AIDS and that smoking causes lung cancer. We additionally show that endorsement of a cluster of conspiracy theories (e.g., that the CIA killed Martin-Luther King or that NASA faked the moon landing) predicts rejection of climate science as well as the rejection of other scientific findings, above and beyond endorsement of laissez-faire free markets. This provides empirical conrmation of previous suggestions that conspiracist ideation contributes to the rejection of science. Acceptance of science, by contrast, was strongly associated with the perception of a consensus among scientists.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 8^th, 2012 at 12:15pm by Upton Sinclair »

"I am not asking the Australian people to take me on trust, but on the record of a lifetime,"
--Tony Abbott

IP Logged