freediver wrote on Sep 20
th, 2012 at 10:33pm:
Quote:I think they were inappropriate.
How so?
It is inappropriate to display such signs in a country with a legal system that does not implement capital punishment, and which considers such punishment to be unjust.
There's just simply no need for such signs, as the ones carrying them do not live under an Islamic system, and therefore even speaking about Islamic punishments is just nonsensical.
freediver wrote on Sep 20
th, 2012 at 10:33pm:
Quote:But it's really irrelevant what I think anyway.
Why? What is relevant here?
Since I did not attend the protests, and have nothing to do with them, what relevance does my view hold? I get that you're mentally incapable of realising that what one Muslim does is not the responsibility of every other Muslim.... I'm simply trying to educate you.
freediver wrote on Sep 20
th, 2012 at 10:33pm:
You may not have noticed, but much of the debate has focussed on the extent to which these people represent the Muslim community. Obviously to find out what muslims generally believe, you have to start with what they specifically believe. It is these sorts of deflections that make people think the problem runs far deeper than is immediately apparent.
I couldn't care less what you think the debate has been about. The debate, in reality, is about peddling xenophobic garbage in order to justify the government's actions here and abroad.