Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2012 at 12:14pm:


What 'reason' spot? That we should all relax and ignore the fact that 400 people marched through Sydney calling for Murder? That it is now considered impolite to talk about freedom of speech in case the Muslims get upset and think we oppose their barbaric ideas?

On what basis do you insist that the 400 people marching behind the signs did not in fact support the signs?

Quote:


The fact that they were marching behind them. Have you seen any of the 400 protestors publicly speak out in opposition to the death penalty for blasphemy?

Given that they were marching behind these signs, the onus is not on me to prove anything more. It is pretty absurd to expect people to believe anything else.

Quote:


They were all idiots to be marching behind signs calling for murder. But even Abu supports the death penalty for blasphemers.

What exactly would it take for you to realise they are nutters? Do you need 400 stat decs saying they support what they were protesting for?

freediver wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2012 at 7:55pm:


100% agree.

However, it doesn't mean that they support murder.

freediver wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2012 at 7:59pm:


You're answering my question with a question, and avoiding the issue.

What evidence do you have that suggests that the 400 were supporting what was said on the signs.

And no, I haven't seen any of the 400 publicly speak out in opposition.  However, that's not evidence that they support murder.

So, over to you ... what evidence do you have?

freediver wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2012 at 8:09pm:



You've provided no evidence, merely assumptions.

Do you have any empirical evidence?

It's not a trick question.

Yes, or no?

If yes, what is it?

Yes. I have already told you what the evidence was. You seem to be stuck in some kind of alternative reality where protestors march behind signs calling for things they oppose. Marching behind multiple signs calling for the same thing is evidence that you support it - especially combined with the public outcry, the Muslims community leaders distancing themselves from it, and not a single one of those 400 religious nutters coming out and saying oops I don't actually support that.

freediver wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2012 at 8:19pm:


No, it quite simply is not.

It's evidence that they were marching behind signs calling for murder.  Nothing more.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 24^th, 2012 at 4:01am:


Then you must be disappointed to know that outside of your twisted mind it hasn't happened yet. So far this new boy dumbarse has tried to hit freediver (and others) with one ridiculous quote and victory chant after another. He seems to be a certified spastic with his head up his arse.

That being the case, I have to wonder; Is this mr greg pecy another one of your forum friends? They always seem to have a smell of ill conceived left wing stupidity, coupled with aggression and a fetish for the high daily post counts. Their inability to understand written English also seems to be a trait highly regarded by your kind.

As for the rest of your post... they must have been blind. As if anyone could spend that much time in a protest and not see what others were carrying. But then again, I suppose the signs where written mostly in English, so you might have a point. But they are all supposed to be born and raised here Australians and are as much Australian as anyone else... so I guess you still don't have one.