Australian Politics Forum

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1155 - Dec 17^th, 2012 at 2:44pm

sanofi wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 2:15pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Emma wrote on Dec 15^th, 2012 at 10:52pm:

now I haven't been reading all the prev posts obviously, but I'm intrigued about this 'Taser' bizzo.

Prima facie, there would seem to be enough evidence to charge police over intentional over-use of these weapons, KNOWING these Tasers haved killed many before. In more than one case in Australia.

Police are not above the law, and should at least face Manslaughter charges.
At LEAST.

Also, those responsible for the roll- out of these killing weapons to Police without adequate supervision or training, are equally culpable. IMO

"At first glance" i'd say everyone would have been better off if the bloke didn't break the law in the first place.

Funny how many people miss the root cause of the crime and drugs.

Something must addle their minds. Undecided

We have an issue with the debate, in that the moderator determined that the case is to be recessed until April 2013.
In a moot court or live case, when the determination is given, that is it. The judges decision is final.
What to do? Had we proceeded, the schematic would have been:
1. Review the facts through the legal principles, witness statements (eyewitness, character and forensic), technical information and training.
2. Cross examine all witnesses to establish the veracity of their statements.
3. Present one's conclusions regarding each of the police officers, backed up with legal precedents, including the ratio decidendi and obiter dicta of each of the cases for each of the defendants.
But we can't do that now because of the moderator's determination.

My thoughts are that the moderator may be deemed incompetent and a new one substituted. As visitors are fairly rare in this thread, if we had say 10 posts to say that then he's out. Then you need a new moderator. Someone that is agreeable to both parties.

Back to top

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1156 - Dec 17^th, 2012 at 2:47pm

sanofi wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 2:15pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Emma wrote on Dec 15^th, 2012 at 10:52pm:

now I haven't been reading all the prev posts obviously, but I'm intrigued about this 'Taser' bizzo.

Prima facie, there would seem to be enough evidence to charge police over intentional over-use of these weapons, KNOWING these Tasers haved killed many before. In more than one case in Australia.

Police are not above the law, and should at least face Manslaughter charges.
At LEAST.

Also, those responsible for the roll- out of these killing weapons to Police without adequate supervision or training, are equally culpable. IMO

"At first glance" i'd say everyone would have been better off if the bloke didn't break the law in the first place.

Funny how many people miss the root cause of the crime and drugs.

Something must addle their minds. Undecided

We have an issue with the debate, in that the moderator determined that the case is to be recessed until April 2013.
In a moot court or live case, when the determination is given, that is it. The judges decision is final.
What to do? Had we proceeded, the schematic would have been:
1. Review the facts through the legal principles, witness statements (eyewitness, character and forensic), technical information and training.
2. Cross examine all witnesses to establish the veracity of their statements.
3. Present one's conclusions regarding each of the police officers, backed up with legal precedents, including the ratio decidendi and obiter dicta of each of the cases for each of the defendants.
But we can't do that now because of the moderator's determination.

My thoughts are that the moderator may be deemed incompetent and a new one substituted. As visitors are fairly rare in this thread, if we had say 10 posts to say that then he's out. Then you need a new moderator. Someone that is agreeable to both parties.

Back to top

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1157 - Dec 17^th, 2012 at 3:04pm

magpie wrote on Dec 17^th, 2012 at 2:44pm:

sanofi wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 2:15pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 16^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Emma wrote on Dec 15^th, 2012 at 10:52pm:

now I haven't been reading all the prev posts obviously, but I'm intrigued about this 'Taser' bizzo.

Prima facie, there would seem to be enough evidence to charge police over intentional over-use of these weapons, KNOWING these Tasers haved killed many before. In more than one case in Australia.

Police are not above the law, and should at least face Manslaughter charges.
At LEAST.

Also, those responsible for the roll- out of these killing weapons to Police without adequate supervision or training, are equally culpable. IMO

"At first glance" i'd say everyone would have been better off if the bloke didn't break the law in the first place.

Funny how many people miss the root cause of the crime and drugs.

Something must addle their minds. Undecided

We have an issue with the debate, in that the moderator determined that the case is to be recessed until April 2013.
In a moot court or live case, when the determination is given, that is it. The judges decision is final.
What to do? Had we proceeded, the schematic would have been:
1. Review the facts through the legal principles, witness statements (eyewitness, character and forensic), technical information and training.
2. Cross examine all witnesses to establish the veracity of their statements.
3. Present one's conclusions regarding each of the police officers, backed up with legal precedents, including the ratio decidendi and obiter dicta of each of the cases for each of the defendants.
But we can't do that now because of the moderator's determination.

My thoughts are that the moderator may be deemed incompetent and a new one substituted. As visitors are fairly rare in this thread, if we had say 10 posts to say that then he's out. Then you need a new moderator. Someone that is agreeable to both parties.

FAGPIE! One more outburst like that and I will hold you in contempt.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1158 - Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1159 - Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am: I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha SOB BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!!
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

shaitan Junior Member Offline member of the Victorious Alliance Posts: 62 Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1160 - Dec 19^th, 2012 at 6:48pm ... wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am: I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha SOB BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!! I have a solution. I will be the moderator if Friyay agrees.
Back to top	As long as one tax haven exists, there will be a place for the corrupt and the greedy to hide the money they steal from the workers. IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1161 - Dec 19^th, 2012 at 7:07pm shaitan wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 6:48pm: ... wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am: I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha SOB BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!! I have a solution. I will be the moderator if Friyay agrees. MOTION DENIED.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1162 - Dec 20^th, 2012 at 5:37am Haha i dont think you can deny a motion to sack you SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1163 - Dec 20^th, 2012 at 9:10am

... wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 7:07pm:

shaitan wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 6:48pm:

... wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am:

I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha

SOB

BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!!

I have a solution. I will be the moderator if Friyay agrees.

MOTION DENIED.

well, sanofi, this is another fine mess you've gotten us into..

Back to top

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1164 - Dec 20^th, 2012 at 10:06am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 5:37am: Haha i dont think you can deny a motion to sack you SOB This is MY courtroom. You have no authority here.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26513 Australia	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1165 - Dec 21^st, 2012 at 5:48am ... wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 10:06am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 5:37am: Haha i dont think you can deny a motion to sack you SOB This is MY courtroom. You have no authority here. I have never beat my wife SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1166 - Dec 21^st, 2012 at 8:28am

shaitan wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 6:48pm:

... wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am:

I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha

SOB

BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!!

I have a solution. I will be the moderator if Friyay agrees.

Moderate away.

No one will ever prove that this poor bloke died of other causes whilst the police officers were trying to murder him.

Retards.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35241
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1167 - Dec 21^st, 2012 at 9:54am

magpie wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 9:10am:

... wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 7:07pm:

shaitan wrote on Dec 19^th, 2012 at 6:48pm:

... wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 9:57am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 18^th, 2012 at 5:56am:

I was surprised you would accept him as moderator @all haha

SOB

BAILIFF! REMOVE THIS MAN FROM MY COURT!!

I have a solution. I will be the moderator if Friyay agrees.

MOTION DENIED.

well, sanofi, this is another fine mess you've gotten us into..

i'm surprised you hang out with the starship enterprise crew.
they all seem a lot dumber than you.
your friends. are sort of, the forums dregs
watch they dont scramble the magpie's eggs

Back to top

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #1168 - Dec 21^st, 2012 at 10:14am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 21^st, 2012 at 5:48am:

... wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 10:06am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 5:37am:

Haha i dont think you can deny a motion to sack you

SOB

This is MY courtroom. You have no authority here.

I have never beat my wife

SOB

I know. You could never beat your wife, or anyone else, at anything.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #1169 - Dec 21^st, 2012 at 11:41am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 20^th, 2012 at 5:37am: Haha i dont think you can deny a motion to sack you SOB In a court...absolutely he can. In a boardroom, the HoR or as chair of a meeting, no he can't..
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

Poll
Question: Who is the Greatest Troll of them All? (Mark III)
quantum Soren Mantra Muso Spot of Borg Mist bigole Other « Last Modified by: Sir Spot of Borg on: Jun 16^th, 2013 at 5:36am »