Australian Politics Forum

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #975 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #976 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #977 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #978 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #979 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:00pm

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Or like hitting his head on the ground. Roll Eyes

So how does tasing someone 14 times when subdued not count as malice, and forethought when they know that one taser shot can kill someone?

We are talking about an individual case here.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #980 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:35pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:00pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Or like hitting his head on the ground. Roll Eyes

So how does tasing someone 14 times when subdued not count as malice, and forethought when they know that one taser shot can kill someone?

We are talking about an individual case here.

LOL

I don’t think your case will stand up in court. You want them charged with attempting to murder a dead person. I don’t think for 1 second the police went into this wanting to murder anyone. Murder requires certain criteria to be met and that aint gunna happen.

Your argument is every time a police officer fires a taser it’s attempted murder, because they know 1 taser shot can kill!! FFS.

Tell you what? I can’t even understand the sentence.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #981 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:49pm

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:35pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:00pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Or like hitting his head on the ground. Roll Eyes

So how does tasing someone 14 times when subdued not count as malice, and forethought when they know that one taser shot can kill someone?

We are talking about an individual case here.

LOL

I don’t think your case will stand up in court. You want them charged with attempting to murder a dead person. I don’t think for 1 second the police went into this wanting to murder anyone. Murder requires certain criteria to be met and that aint gunna happen.

Your argument is every time a police officer fires a taser it’s attempted murder, because they know 1 taser shot can kill!! FFS.

Tell you what? I can’t even understand the sentence.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

So you are saying he was dead when they were tasering him?
Maybe they didn't but they did go into it knowing they could murder someone and get away with it.

The requirements are there, you listed them and I explained what they are in this case, I don't hear you refuting what I said.

Once again you need to put words in my mouth, I find it hard to believe that if I was as wrong as you make out that someone as intelligent as you would need to put words in my mouth to make an argument.
How on earth is that my argument, how did you come to that conclusion?
My argument is that if you taser a subdued person multible times for no reason then you can be liable of attempted murder.
You made up the sentence.

Non argument, you wouldn't need to say that if you could prove me wrong.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #982 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:55pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:49pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:35pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:00pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Or like hitting his head on the ground. Roll Eyes

So how does tasing someone 14 times when subdued not count as malice, and forethought when they know that one taser shot can kill someone?

We are talking about an individual case here.

LOL

I don’t think your case will stand up in court. You want them charged with attempting to murder a dead person. I don’t think for 1 second the police went into this wanting to murder anyone. Murder requires certain criteria to be met and that aint gunna happen.

Your argument is every time a police officer fires a taser it’s attempted murder, because they know 1 taser shot can kill!! FFS.

Tell you what? I can’t even understand the sentence.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

So you are saying he was dead when they were tasering him?
Maybe they didn't but they did go into it knowing they could murder someone and get away with it.

The requirements are there, you listed them and I explained what they are in this case, I don't hear you refuting what I said.

Once again you need to put words in my mouth, I find it hard to believe that if I was as wrong as you make out that someone as intelligent as you would need to put words in my mouth to make an argument.
How on earth is that my argument, how did you come to that conclusion?
My argument is that if you taser a subdued person multible times for no reason then you can be liable of attempted murder.
You made up the sentence.

Non argument, you wouldn't need to say that if you could prove me wrong.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #983 - Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 4:01pm

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:49pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:35pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 3:00pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:32pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:28pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

Well if cause of death can't be determined it can be.

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

You are making conjecture that the police's actions were responsible for his death yet this cannot be factually confirmed. Subsequently they cannot be charged for his murder which means their actions can be considered attempted murder. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

LOL….

Died of natural causes while police were attempting to murder. Roll Eyes

They can not be charged with murder because little things like, intent, forethought, malice etc need to be proven. Wink

They couldn’t even pin those scumbag crown bouncers with murder. Sad

I’m afraid your salivating will be wasted. Tongue

Or like hitting his head on the ground. Roll Eyes

So how does tasing someone 14 times when subdued not count as malice, and forethought when they know that one taser shot can kill someone?

We are talking about an individual case here.

LOL

I don’t think your case will stand up in court. You want them charged with attempting to murder a dead person. I don’t think for 1 second the police went into this wanting to murder anyone. Murder requires certain criteria to be met and that aint gunna happen.

Your argument is every time a police officer fires a taser it’s attempted murder, because they know 1 taser shot can kill!! FFS.

Tell you what? I can’t even understand the sentence.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

So you are saying he was dead when they were tasering him?
Maybe they didn't but they did go into it knowing they could murder someone and get away with it.

The requirements are there, you listed them and I explained what they are in this case, I don't hear you refuting what I said.

Once again you need to put words in my mouth, I find it hard to believe that if I was as wrong as you make out that someone as intelligent as you would need to put words in my mouth to make an argument.
How on earth is that my argument, how did you come to that conclusion?
My argument is that if you taser a subdued person multible times for no reason then you can be liable of attempted murder.
You made up the sentence.

Non argument, you wouldn't need to say that if you could prove me wrong.

I’ll tell you what, you get back to me when they are charged and convicted with attempted murder.

Somehow I can't see you bothering to say this if you could actually prove me wrong.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #984 - Dec 4^th, 2012 at 9:58pm

Quote:

state of the troll-gang:
Verge (destroyed)
Elvira (destroyed)
Friyay (destroyed)
Soren (destroyed)
Frances/Mantra (destroyed)
Aquascoot (destroyed)
dr no (destroyed)
yadda (destroyed) went without a whimper..
Andrei
Big Dave
dsmithy70 (pardon request rejected)

well done on the debate western.. saw your opponent leave the thread defeated. let his defeat serve as a lesson to all trolls..

Wink

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 4^th, 2012 at 10:04pm by magpie »

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

Frances Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3577 In a Castle in the Hills Gender:	Re: Spot of Troll Reply #985 - Dec 5^th, 2012 at 12:39am magpie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2012 at 9:58pm: saw your opponent leave the thread defeated. Defeat? Maybe he just left the thread because he was sick of reading the crap that you and your clones and friends keep posting.
Back to top	Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece. IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #986 - Dec 5^th, 2012 at 3:45am

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

FriYAY wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2012 at 1:14pm:

Quote:

i have taser practice to do

You are more then welcome to debate me on the issue.

Attempted Murder....

Grin

So if the police know that one taser shot can kill someone what does it mean to taser someone 14 or so times?

Well if they die is certainly isn’t ATTEMPTED murder, is it.

The start to the debate is semantics - doesnt bode well for the troll position.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35246
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #987 - Dec 5^th, 2012 at 7:06am

magpie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2012 at 9:58pm:

Quote:

state of the troll-gang:
Verge (destroyed)
Elvira (destroyed)
Friyay (destroyed)
Soren (destroyed)
Frances/Mantra (destroyed)
Aquascoot (destroyed)
dr no (destroyed)
yadda (destroyed) went without a whimper..
Andrei
Big Dave
dsmithy70 (pardon request rejected)

well done on the debate western.. saw your opponent leave the thread defeated. let his defeat serve as a lesson to all trolls..

Wink

feathered friend, i think you've been flying a little high and not getting enough oxygen to the bird brain.

defeat Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #988 - Dec 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am

aquascoot wrote on Dec 5^th, 2012 at 7:06am:

magpie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2012 at 9:58pm:

Quote:

state of the troll-gang:
Verge (destroyed)
Elvira (destroyed)
Friyay (destroyed)
Soren (destroyed)
Frances/Mantra (destroyed)
Aquascoot (destroyed)
dr no (destroyed)
yadda (destroyed) went without a whimper..
Andrei
Big Dave
dsmithy70 (pardon request rejected)

well done on the debate western.. saw your opponent leave the thread defeated. let his defeat serve as a lesson to all trolls..

Wink

feathered friend, i think you've been flying a little high and not getting enough oxygen to the bird brain.

defeat Grin

Back to top

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

magpie

Full Member

Offline

slayer of trolls

Posts: 210
Gender: male

Re: Spot of Troll
Reply #989 - Dec 5^th, 2012 at 8:12am

Frances wrote on Dec 5^th, 2012 at 12:39am:

magpie wrote on Dec 4^th, 2012 at 9:58pm:

saw your opponent leave the thread defeated.

Defeat? Maybe he just left the thread because he was sick of reading the crap that you and your clones and friends keep posting.

is our xy chromosome showing today?
you're still pissed about the puffer fish trap aren't you.. remember when I threw a couple of spotisms at you, like ppl and @, and like a hungry fish you leapt at the bait and said, "you're spot!"
that will be a moment that will live forever in the annals of the victorious alliance and celebrated with quaffing of good blood wine! and the malevolent god post... ah, joy!
sharpen your wits if you want to 'play' in this thread, where trolls fear to enter..

Back to top

the Victorious Alliance. members wanted

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Who is the Greatest Troll of them All? (Mark III)
quantum Soren Mantra Muso Spot of Borg Mist bigole Other « Last Modified by: Sir Spot of Borg on: Jun 16^th, 2013 at 5:36am »