na
... wrote on Jul 19
th, 2013 at 11:38pm:
legalising dope is one thing but supplying addicts is another entirely...although I'm against them both.
Leglisign weed because the gov will tax it, and impose stricter penalties for growers (It then becomes tax evasion)
Supplying addicts because bugger em - I ain't paying for them to get high.
You're not listening, are you?
No-one is talking about
legalising marijuana, just de-criminalizing it's use and production. Just like home-brewers get to do with home brew kits.
2-3 plants per ADULT members of a household - no resale. Personal use only!
Who wants to see the tobacco companies involved? Not me! They can stick their packets, filters, papers and associated chemistry straight up their affiliated jacksies. They'v already proved that they have no conscience.
Tobacco is harder to process than marijuana - fact. Marijuana is easier to grow than tobacco - fact.
Water has now become an asset. Am I now to be penalised because I have the facilities, knowledge and capacity to filter, store and utilise what is a free service - rainfall?
Who would dis-empower me?
Weeds, like rainfall, are available to all those who would utilise such blessings to their ultimate utility.