greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1^st, 2016 at 8:18pm:



That's IT????


You are just a one line reactionary - no ideas of your own, only shallow little quips about everyone else's ideas.
That way you can seem - which is all you ever want - to SEEM.

freediver wrote on Apr 1^st, 2016 at 7:18pm:


LOL what rubbish.

Your first reference to him not posting any examples is in post 93, to which greg immediately replied there were examples in the link (which there is). You then made your first request for examples in post 95 (God knows why) - to which he provided his first copy and paste from his link 3 minutes later in post 96. You then thanked him for it.

Most absurdly, a few pages later you started this nonsense that, in your words:

Quote:


when actually, you prompted precisely once, and got what you requested 3 minutes later.

State Department's National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism: Annex of Statistical Information:

SIGNIFICANT TRENDS
Although terrorist attacks took place in 95 countries in 2014, they were heavily concentrated geographically. More than 60% of all attacks took place in five countries (Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and Nigeria), and 78% of all fatalities due to terrorist attacks took place in five countries (Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria).

The number of terrorist attacks in 2014 increased 35% and total fatalities increased 81% compared to 2013, largely due to activity in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Nigeria. In certain countries, including Greece, Nepal, Northern Ireland, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Russia, terrorist attacks and total fatalities decreased.

The 81% increase in total fatalities was, in part, a result of certain attacks that were exceptionally lethal. In 2014, there were 20 attacks that killed more than 100 people, compared to two such attacks in 2013.

Terrorism in 2014 was marked by numerous kidnappings and hostage-taking events. More than 9,400 people were kidnapped or taken hostage in terrorist attacks in 2014, three times as many as in 2013. This trend was concentrated in certain countries, including Iraq, Nigeria, and Syria, and was particularly influenced by an increase in attacks that involved large numbers of hostages.

freediver wrote on Apr 4^th, 2016 at 12:21pm:


And, I did.

I posted at least a half a dozen examples, as requested.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 4^th, 2016 at 12:30pm:


Yes, Greggery, but you lost your ability to cut and paste, remember? FD ressurected this thread to prove this.

freediver wrote on Apr 4^th, 2016 at 6:15pm:


You asked for an example of a non-Muslim terrorism, and I then provided several examples (half a dozen, at least).

These are the facts.

freediver wrote on Apr 4^th, 2016 at 7:02pm:


We've been through this already.

I consider all terrorism a problem.

However, a terrorist act that involves graffiti is (quite obviously) in no way as serious as one that involves the loss of life.

Moreover, nobody has ever suggested that it is.

You asked for an example of non-Muslim terrorism, and I provided you with many.

If you think you're not going to like the answer, don't ask the question.

freediver wrote on Apr 4^th, 2016 at 7:32pm:


The statistics I posted provided evidence that not all terrorist attacks are carried out by Muslims.

Moreover, the examples I provided proved my point beyond all doubt.

As I said: if you think you're not going to like the answer, you really shouldn't ask the question.

Chalk this one up as a lesson well learned.