Australian Politics Forum - Islamic terrorism statistics

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #270 - Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:02pm

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 9:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:50pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:01pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 7:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:24pm:

Do you think that consistently equating graffiti attacks with attacks causing multiple fatalities might undermine its ability to accurately capture the terrorism problem?

No.

All terrorism is a problem.

I've told you this before.

Not all terrorism is the same.

Correct.

Did somebody say it was, dear?

As I said - you are wilfully stupid.
You pretend that you can ignore the substance of my post. That just confirms that you are knowingly and wilfuly stupid.
Why do you always rush to play the stupid, ignorant, irritating clown part in every encounter?
You seem compulsive in this regard.

You didn't answer my question.

I'm taking that as a 'no'.

Yes?

I didn't realise you had a question. You seem to be saying everything and the opposite of everything, all at the same time.

It's impossible to know what you ARE saying.

Did somebody say that all terrorism is the same?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95388
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #271 - Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:28pm

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 9:54pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:18pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:08pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

FD, are you a racist?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Ooooh, the trump (!) card.

Racist. This is the most convenient bludgeon to shut up anyone who notices that vultures are different and cultures are pretty well overlapping with countries and races.

The more Africans and other brown people you have in a country the worse the country is. More whites, it's a better place. It works on every indicator. Non-white people simply do not improve a white country. Whites do improve a non-white country. It's just all too plain to see.

I don't think it's a coincidence. Do you?

Oh, no. Wanting to ban blacks isn't racist. Sub-human negroids aren't a race.

What do you think, FD?

Show me a black country that has a queue of white people trying to get into.

I don't know, Frank - Mauritius? Fiji? The Cayman Islands?

Compared to the movement in the other direction?????

You don't believe your own lame-o agit-prop, do you?

I don't know, Frank.

South Africa? Rhodesia? The Belgian Congo?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #272 - Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:30pm

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:28pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 9:54pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:18pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:08pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

FD, are you a racist?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Ooooh, the trump (!) card.

Racist. This is the most convenient bludgeon to shut up anyone who notices that vultures are different and cultures are pretty well overlapping with countries and races.

The more Africans and other brown people you have in a country the worse the country is. More whites, it's a better place. It works on every indicator. Non-white people simply do not improve a white country. Whites do improve a non-white country. It's just all too plain to see.

I don't think it's a coincidence. Do you?

Oh, no. Wanting to ban blacks isn't racist. Sub-human negroids aren't a race.

What do you think, FD?

Show me a black country that has a queue of white people trying to get into.

I don't know, Frank - Mauritius? Fiji? The Cayman Islands?

Compared to the movement in the other direction?????

You don't believe your own lame-o agit-prop, do you?

I don't know, Frank.

South Africa? Rhodesia? The Belgian Congo?

Frank might be a racist, but at least he's not an ignorant racist.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95388 Gender:	Re: Islamic terrorism statistics Reply #273 - Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:33pm Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:53pm: And holiday destinations don't count either Burqa Beauty. I don't see why not, Homo. But what about tax havens? You do realise the owners of world's major companies move there, don't you?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48844
At my desk.

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #274 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:19am

This is what Greg is saying, and it is his final word on the matter, except to point out that he is being entirely consistent with himself.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely.

Why do you ask, anyway?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:24pm:

Do you think that consistently equating graffiti attacks with attacks causing multiple fatalities might undermine its ability to accurately capture the terrorism problem?

No.

All terrorism is a problem.

I've told you this before.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 136697 Gender:	Re: Islamic terrorism statistics Reply #275 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:38am freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:19am: This is what Greg is saying, and it is his final word on the matter, except to point out that he is being entirely consistent with himself. Correct.
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 45107
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #276 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 10:28pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 9:54pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:18pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 8:08pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

FD, are you a racist?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Ooooh, the trump (!) card.

Racist. This is the most convenient bludgeon to shut up anyone who notices that vultures are different and cultures are pretty well overlapping with countries and races.

The more Africans and other brown people you have in a country the worse the country is. More whites, it's a better place. It works on every indicator. Non-white people simply do not improve a white country. Whites do improve a non-white country. It's just all too plain to see.

I don't think it's a coincidence. Do you?

Oh, no. Wanting to ban blacks isn't racist. Sub-human negroids aren't a race.

What do you think, FD?

Show me a black country that has a queue of white people trying to get into.

I don't know, Frank - Mauritius? Fiji? The Cayman Islands?

Compared to the movement in the other direction?????

You don't believe your own lame-o agit-prop, do you?

I don't know, Frank.

South Africa? Rhodesia? The Belgian Congo?

Really? White people are trying to get into South Africa, Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of the Congo??

That's news to everyone, I am sure.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #277 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am

freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:19am:

This is what Greg is saying, and it is his final word on the matter, except to point out that he is being entirely consistent with himself.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely.

Why do you ask, anyway?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:24pm:

Do you think that consistently equating graffiti attacks with attacks causing multiple fatalities might undermine its ability to accurately capture the terrorism problem?

No.

All terrorism is a problem.

I've told you this before.

Equating a terrorist event that includes death as equal a problem as one that involves spray painted slogan on a wall is relativist apologism taken to an idiotic extreme.

The FBI statistic is compiled to correspond with their definition of terrorist, it also needs updating. It does not in any way speak to weightings. Greg likes it bcause he can point at it and with his considerable reserves of stamina point out repeatedly that Islamic inspired terrorism is a minority.

Greg cites the statistics only to diminish and mitigate from the deadly problem of Islamic inspired atrocities.

That is the entirety of his point. It is apologism and an attempt at deflection.

Luckily the FBI is not as binary as greggs thinking and they allocate more funding and resources to defeating and denying Islamic inspired terrorism because they understand a difference in severity between a graffiti and death.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 45107 Gender:	Re: Islamic terrorism statistics Reply #278 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:26am greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm: All terrorism is a problem. I've told you this before. It's just that Islamic terrorism is more deadly and and more widespread than any other. It's simply a much, much more serious problem than chalk signs on the pavement. Why pretend otherwise?
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #279 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27am

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am:

Equating a terrorist event that includes death as equal a problem as one that involves spray painted slogan on a wall is relativist apologism taken to an idiotic extreme.

And nobody has done that.

Is English your first language?

"Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely.?" GP

You look quite the fool now.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #280 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:29am

Frank wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

All terrorism is a problem.

I've told you this before.

It's just that Islamic terrorism is more deadly and and more widespread than any other. It's simply a much, much more serious problem than chalk signs on the pavement. Why pretend otherwise?

Again: is English not your first language?

"Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely." GP

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48844
At my desk.

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #281 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:30am

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am:

Equating a terrorist event that includes death as equal a problem as one that involves spray painted slogan on a wall is relativist apologism taken to an idiotic extreme.

And nobody has done that.

Is English your first language?

Do you think that consistently equating graffiti attacks with attacks causing multiple fatalities might undermine the ability of these statistics to accurately capture the terrorism problem?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #282 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:32am

Frank wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

All terrorism is a problem.

I've told you this before.

It's just that Islamic terrorism is more deadly and and more widespread than any other. It's simply a much, much more serious problem than chalk signs on the pavement. Why pretend otherwise?

Who's pretending otherwise?

FD asked for an example of non-Muslim terrorism.

I provided him with many examples.

Which part don't you understand?

"Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely."

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136697
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #283 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:33am

freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am:

Equating a terrorist event that includes death as equal a problem as one that involves spray painted slogan on a wall is relativist apologism taken to an idiotic extreme.

And nobody has done that.

Is English your first language?

Do you think that consistently equating graffiti attacks with attacks causing multiple fatalities might undermine the ability of these statistics to accurately capture the terrorism problem?

No.

All terrorism is a problem.

I've explained this to you before.

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Islamic terrorism statistics
Reply #284 - Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:36am

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:22am:

Equating a terrorist event that includes death as equal a problem as one that involves spray painted slogan on a wall is relativist apologism taken to an idiotic extreme.

And nobody has done that.

Is English your first language?

"Is an attack that causes death worse than a graffiti attack, or an incinerated car? Absolutely.?" GP

You look quite the fool now.

It is inherent in your diminishing of the severity of Islamic inspired atrocities to graffiti in your bald statement that "all terrorism is a problem", implying the problem is likewise equal, or even that Islamic causes being lesser because in a simplistic count the number is lessor.

With no regard to weightings it implies a relativism.

I am not sure if you are truely limited in your thinking or a rabid apologist. Or most probably both.

Back to top

IP Logged