Soren wrote on Nov 4
th, 2012 at 8:11pm:
Nevertheless, there is all the difference between aiming for nothingness (annihilation) and aiming for redemption (validation).
ahh,the old nihilistic version of buddhism which says it is a depressing doctrine.
i find little in buddhism that is fairly logical.
aiming ofr annihilation? i would say more recognising the truth of our fate.
a pessimistic doctrine.? no probably a realistic doctrine.
be you devoted to wealth or powe, the best you can hope for is to be the richest man in the cemetary
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc8c/afc8c74f2a953eb94838048b5b534739d7963be7" alt="Wink Wink"
be you devoted to sex or pleasures, the best you can hope for is the temporary relief of an itch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc8c/afc8c74f2a953eb94838048b5b534739d7963be7" alt="Wink Wink"
buddhism offers the best hope of marrying a philosophy/religion with modern secular consumerism.
it will cause an about face in the consumer society, but that (as perceptions now quite rightly points out in his "for the record") is an inevitable consequence of our limited planet, limited lifespan.
so as paradoxical as it is to embrace reality, it is the end game for sure.
only by believing in a continuation of "the ego' after death can the western christian or muslim ignore the current reality and that is probably just the ego refusing to accept its fate ...annihimation