Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
A Maqqa's Surplus, that was? (Read 3113 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59393
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Surplus, that was?
Reply #30 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:27pm
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:23pm:
Dnarever wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:06pm:
Rather exposes the lie about how poor an economy they inherited.


Im sure you believe it. No many others so.

Plus we are talking here about a SPREADHSEET error - not any actual money.



The NSW economy must have been in a real mess if the Liberals could turn it around by accident before they actually did anything.

It is obvious that it was never as bad at the Libs were telling us.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:33pm by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: The Surplus, that was?
Reply #31 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:47pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:27pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:23pm:
Dnarever wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:06pm:
Rather exposes the lie about how poor an economy they inherited.


Im sure you believe it. No many others so.

Plus we are talking here about a SPREADHSEET error - not any actual money.



The NSW economy must have been in a real mess if the Liberals could turn it around by accident before they actually did anything.

It is obvious that it was never as bad at the Libs were telling us.


Its just the usual lies new govts spew out so they can trash the state or country to teach voters a lesson for keeping them out of power for so long.
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Surplus, that was?
Reply #32 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:08pm
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:20pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:10pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:26pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 4:57pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 3:30pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:32pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:09am:
The Federal ALP makes stuff ups after HUNDREDS of BILLIONS worth of stuff ups with their estimates without PN making a squeak

But when the State LIBs make an error of ONE BILLION - OMG it's the end of the world!!!???  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Also remember that this is the reporting system that was left behind by the ALP


It seems you are confused, as usual, Maqqa!

You are mixing large Federal figures, with much smaller State figures.

You are also mixing errors made in estimates, to the  incorrect & improper placement &/or non-placement of Real, end of the line figures.

You are also mixing errors, with deliberate choices made for what appears to be purely Political gain. 

You are also confusing the system, with the incorrect & improper "use" of the system, for SPIN.

I would Condemn any Politician &/or Political Party, for incorrect & improper Financial Reporting, SPIN or straight out lies!

How about you?




No confusion here PN

it comes out in the wash

Facts are the LIBs just took over the budget and discovered it to be full of holes

Labor can't be having a go at LIBs for missing the target when it missed on many occasions

Even better, when the libs miss, they miss by giving a surplus. labor miss by giving us worse deficits.


Id rather hear 'oops, we actually have a SURPLUS'
thann 'oops, we have a deficit... again' which is what we hear from labor all the time.


Longy,
That's what wasn't heard from the NSW Treasurer, BUT should have been!

And, that's what WAS heard from the NSW Treasurer!



IM sure that one day you wil make sense. Alas, today is not the day!


Longy,
Just in case, you haven't looked at the first post of this thread, it may enlighten you.

However, the abbreviated version is, the NSW Auditor General has said that there were many "errors" in both Revenue & Expenditure, in the NSW Budget, as declared by the NSW Treasurer Mike Baird.

So, the deficit of $337 million announced in this year's budget should in fact be a surplus of $680 million.

Therefore, the "oops we have a deficit again", which was declared by the Liberals, should actually have been declared as a Surplus and the obvious reasons for these "errors"are Political SPIN.


It is apparent, particularly when you look at the reasoning given by both the Auditor General & the NSW Treasurer, that they have been caught out!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: The Surplus, that was?
Reply #33 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:03am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:08pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:20pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:10pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:26pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 4:57pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 3:30pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:32pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:09am:
The Federal ALP makes stuff ups after HUNDREDS of BILLIONS worth of stuff ups with their estimates without PN making a squeak

But when the State LIBs make an error of ONE BILLION - OMG it's the end of the world!!!???  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Also remember that this is the reporting system that was left behind by the ALP


It seems you are confused, as usual, Maqqa!

You are mixing large Federal figures, with much smaller State figures.

You are also mixing errors made in estimates, to the  incorrect & improper placement &/or non-placement of Real, end of the line figures.

You are also mixing errors, with deliberate choices made for what appears to be purely Political gain. 

You are also confusing the system, with the incorrect & improper "use" of the system, for SPIN.

I would Condemn any Politician &/or Political Party, for incorrect & improper Financial Reporting, SPIN or straight out lies!

How about you?




No confusion here PN

it comes out in the wash

Facts are the LIBs just took over the budget and discovered it to be full of holes

Labor can't be having a go at LIBs for missing the target when it missed on many occasions

Even better, when the libs miss, they miss by giving a surplus. labor miss by giving us worse deficits.


Id rather hear 'oops, we actually have a SURPLUS'
thann 'oops, we have a deficit... again' which is what we hear from labor all the time.


Longy,
That's what wasn't heard from the NSW Treasurer, BUT should have been!

And, that's what WAS heard from the NSW Treasurer!



IM sure that one day you wil make sense. Alas, today is not the day!


Longy,
Just in case, you haven't looked at the first post of this thread, it may enlighten you.

However, the abbreviated version is, the NSW Auditor General has said that there were many "errors" in both Revenue & Expenditure, in the NSW Budget, as declared by the NSW Treasurer Mike Baird.

So, the deficit of $337 million announced in this year's budget should in fact be a surplus of $680 million.

Therefore, the "oops we have a deficit again", which was declared by the Liberals, should actually have been declared as a Surplus and the obvious reasons for these "errors"are Political SPIN.


It is apparent, particularly when you look at the reasoning given by both the Auditor General & the NSW Treasurer, that they have been caught out!


Caught out??? They were 'caught out' by an error in a spreadsheet - hardly the stuff of legend in the world of govt mistakes. and this mistake meant they were actually in SURPLUS. Its like redoing your personal accounts and finding $10,000 extra. Its the kind of  'mistake' we all dream of!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #34 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am
 
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #35 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:03am
 
Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am:
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system


Maqqa..I think you've proved over the years that your only understanding of economics is whatever Coalition propaganda is doing the rounds on the day
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #36 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:04am
 
adelcrow wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:03am:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am:
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system


Maqqa..I think you've proved over the years that your only understanding of economics is whatever Coalition propaganda is doing the rounds on the day


based on your perception?!!  Grin Grin Grin

I have thrown down challenges before and none from the left dared to take it up

so until you do - FU
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
stryder
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #37 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:13am
 
Quote:
Maqqa..I think you've proved over the years that your only understanding of economics is whatever Coalition propaganda is doing the rounds on the day
adelcrow



And yours adelcrow are from what I gather from the posts that you pasted relating to anything economical comes from the dictations of the communist manifesto written by marx and engels a very long long long time ago, 
  Grin
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:18am by stryder »  
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #38 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:15am
 
stryder wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:13am:
Quote:
Maqqa..I think you've proved over the years that your only understanding of economics is whatever Coalition propaganda is doing the rounds on the day
adelcrow

And yours adelcrow are from what I gather from the posts that you pasted relating to anything economical comes from the dictations of the communist manifesto wriiten by karl marx a long long long time ago, 
  Grin


Actually I copy all my information from my extensive library of books written by the worlds past and present Communist Dictators and their mentors.
Tongue
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
stryder
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #39 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:16am
 
Quote:
Actually I copy all my information from my extensive library of books written by the worlds past and present Communist Dictators and their mentors.

 
adelcrow


I believe you
  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #40 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 11:13am
 
Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am:
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system


Maqqa,
The REAL Reality, as distinct from the SPIN Reality is  that -
The Auditor General said, there were "37 errors greater than $20 million in his examination of the 2011-12 accounts, including two mistakes worth more than $1 billion each."

The Auditor General also said, ""I would say a $1 million error is unfortunate. A $10 million error is undesirable. But a $100 million error is totally unacceptable.

"The NSW government is a billion dollar business, it is not a school tuckshop."

Mr Achterstraat said more accurate financial information could have had an influence over government policy - recently marked by billions in cuts to health and education.

"It is a bit like a cricket match," he said.

"If you're the bowling team, and you think the batting team has to get 300 runs, you bowl a certain way.

"Then if you find out five overs later that the people have been giving you the wrong information, you would have bowled in a very different way."

The blunders included errors in spreadsheets, data entry, end of year accruals and reconciliation processes."


So Maqqa, it seems obvious that you will not condemn these practices, because of YOUR Political biases!

Whereas I am interested in the facts & how they impact the Public and IF either Liberal or Labor trying to mislead or dupe the Public, I will condemn them! 

And so, on that basis, I say that any state government is NOT a "tuck shop", it is essentially a large & powerful Economic instrument and each has sufficient expertise to ensure a correctly produced set of Budget figures, but perhaps not the Political will, IF the REAL figures don't project the required image/s!

In this instance, the Auditor General has made it clear, that these were not mere "inconsistencies" and IF there are "systemic built in accounting errors", which the Auditor General has not referred to, then it is up to the Party delivering the Budget to find any such "systemic built in accounting errors", fix them and inform the Public.

The Liberals did none of that!

The difference between us is that, IF Labor puts themselves in a similar position, I will condemn them, the same as I condemn the Liberals in this instance based on the Reality of the situation, WHEREAS YOU condemn Labor for everything, BUT simply revert to SPIN for everything Liberal!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: The Surplus, that was?
Reply #41 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 11:21am
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:03am:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:08pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:20pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:10pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:26pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 4:57pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 3:30pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:32pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:09am:
The Federal ALP makes stuff ups after HUNDREDS of BILLIONS worth of stuff ups with their estimates without PN making a squeak

But when the State LIBs make an error of ONE BILLION - OMG it's the end of the world!!!???  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Also remember that this is the reporting system that was left behind by the ALP


It seems you are confused, as usual, Maqqa!

You are mixing large Federal figures, with much smaller State figures.

You are also mixing errors made in estimates, to the  incorrect & improper placement &/or non-placement of Real, end of the line figures.

You are also mixing errors, with deliberate choices made for what appears to be purely Political gain. 

You are also confusing the system, with the incorrect & improper "use" of the system, for SPIN.

I would Condemn any Politician &/or Political Party, for incorrect & improper Financial Reporting, SPIN or straight out lies!

How about you?




No confusion here PN

it comes out in the wash

Facts are the LIBs just took over the budget and discovered it to be full of holes

Labor can't be having a go at LIBs for missing the target when it missed on many occasions

Even better, when the libs miss, they miss by giving a surplus. labor miss by giving us worse deficits.


Id rather hear 'oops, we actually have a SURPLUS'
thann 'oops, we have a deficit... again' which is what we hear from labor all the time.


Longy,
That's what wasn't heard from the NSW Treasurer, BUT should have been!

And, that's what WAS heard from the NSW Treasurer!



IM sure that one day you wil make sense. Alas, today is not the day!


Longy,
Just in case, you haven't looked at the first post of this thread, it may enlighten you.

However, the abbreviated version is, the NSW Auditor General has said that there were many "errors" in both Revenue & Expenditure, in the NSW Budget, as declared by the NSW Treasurer Mike Baird.

So, the deficit of $337 million announced in this year's budget should in fact be a surplus of $680 million.

Therefore, the "oops we have a deficit again", which was declared by the Liberals, should actually have been declared as a Surplus and the obvious reasons for these "errors"are Political SPIN.


It is apparent, particularly when you look at the reasoning given by both the Auditor General & the NSW Treasurer, that they have been caught out!


Caught out??? They were 'caught out' by an error in a spreadsheet - hardly the stuff of legend in the world of govt mistakes. and this mistake meant they were actually in SURPLUS. Its like redoing your personal accounts and finding $10,000 extra. Its the kind of  'mistake' we all dream of!


Longy,
Yes, caught out!


The REAL Reality, as distinct from the SPIN Reality is  that -
The Auditor General said, there were "37 errors greater than $20 million in his examination of the 2011-12 accounts, including two mistakes worth more than $1 billion each."

The Auditor General also said, ""I would say a $1 million error is unfortunate. A $10 million error is undesirable. But a $100 million error is totally unacceptable.

"The NSW government is a billion dollar business, it is not a school tuckshop."

Mr Achterstraat said more accurate financial information could have had an influence over government policy - recently marked by billions in cuts to health and education.

"It is a bit like a cricket match," he said.

"If you're the bowling team, and you think the batting team has to get 300 runs, you bowl a certain way.

"Then if you find out five overs later that the people have been giving you the wrong information, you would have bowled in a very different way."

The blunders included errors in spreadsheets, data entry, end of year accruals and reconciliation processes."


So Longy, on that basis, I say that any state government is NOT a "tuck shop", it is essentially a large & powerful Economic instrument and each has sufficient expertise to ensure a correctly produced set of Budget figures, but perhaps not the Political will, IF the REAL figures don't project the required image/s!

In this instance, the Auditor General has made it clear, that these were not mere "inconsistencies" and IF there are "systemic built in accounting errors", which the Auditor General has not referred to, then it is up to the Party delivering the Budget to find any such "systemic built in accounting errors", fix them and inform the Public.

The Liberals did none of that!


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #42 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 11:57am
 
In true pinhead style... blame the Libs for an ACTUAL surplus and a spreadsheet error but ignore Labors massive over-spending and deficit ways.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59393
Here
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #43 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:03pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am:
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system



GM
Quote:
Caught out??? They were 'caught out' by an error in a spreadsheet - hardly the stuff of legend in the world of govt mistakes. and this mistake meant they were actually in SURPLUS. Its like redoing your personal accounts and finding $10,000 extra. Its the kind of 'mistake' we all dream of!


They were caught out by around 40 errors + in a spread sheet.

A spreadsheet that the treasurer is responsible for ensuring is correct.

The one where the numbers are added up to form the NSW budget, the end result of the Treasurers year of work.

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

No the errors were in the budget accounting, this is audited every budget, this is the first time this type of errors have been found.

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

Yes with no substantial errors in accounting identified during the audit process.

PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

PN getting it wrong if he did has no consequences, there they're their is a much greater problem when Mr Baired the NSW treasurer shows us that he is not capable of correctly keeping the states books in order.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:15pm by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: A Maqqa's Surplus, that was?
Reply #44 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:14pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:03pm:
Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:45am:
PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

The reality is this:

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

(3) This is the same system that produced deficits under a Labor government but produced a surplus under a LIB government - why is that??!!


PN is trying to infer that the LIBs are to be blamed for the current reporting system



GM
Quote:
Caught out??? They were 'caught out' by an error in a spreadsheet - hardly the stuff of legend in the world of govt mistakes. and this mistake meant they were actually in SURPLUS. Its like redoing your personal accounts and finding $10,000 extra. Its the kind of 'mistake' we all dream of!


They were caught out by around 40 errors + in a spread sheet.

A spreadsheet that the treasurer is responsible for ensuring is correct.

The one where the numbers are added up to form the NSW budget, the end result of the Treasurers year of work.

(1) The Auditor General found inconsistencies in the current reporting system

No the errors were in the budget accounting, this is audited every budget, this is the first time this type of errors have been found.

(2) This is the same reporting system Labor have been using for the last 10 years

Yes with no substantial errors in accounting identified during the audit process.

PN is trying to show he/she understand economics - been doing for years now

PN getting it wrong if he did has no consequences, there they're their is a much greater problem when Mr Baired the NSW treasurer shows us that he is not capable of correctly keeping the ststes books in order.


IM not saying the Treasurer doesnt deserve some mocking. But at the end of they day they have a REAL surplus and the spreadsheet is of little consequence. The bills are paid in $ - not excel cell formulae.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print