Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I (Read 2435 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21894
A cat with a view
is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Nov 24th, 2012 at 7:54pm
 
muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?





muso wrote on Nov 23rd, 2012 at 10:17pm:

It's a bit like driving.  If you thought about every single thing you did while driving, then you'd find it very difficult, because as another poster pointed out, it's done primarily using the subconscious. The conscious mind only intervenes when something is dangerous, interesting, pleasurable or important ( a hey! moment).





muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?

e.g.
What sort [i.e. what quality] of driving skills are imparted to the subconscious ?

That is; Is it those habits of the conscious mind, which [in the first place] 'instruct' the subconscious ?


muso,

Was Aristotle [below] correct ?




Quote:

We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.



Aristotle


Quote:

"It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."



Professor Dumbledore to Harry.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - J K Rowling



Quote:

There is nothing wrong that cannot be cured by what is right.


???




What we believe, determines how we will act [choose] in this life.
Yadda


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #1 - Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47am
 
If the subconscious necessarily 'obeyed' the will of the 'I', neuroses and personality disorders would not be as chronically tenacious as they are.

But, in any event, I think that applying simplistic principles that define the interaction between the 'I' (the conscious) and the 'other' (all that is subconscious and beyond control of the 'I'), such that the 'I' becomes the 'supreme arbiter' of all we do or become, is the stuff of magical thinking.

It's also the underlying premise of those latter day, self-styled 'gurus' who profit from the innate need for many of us to believe that we can will all things good to us and all things not good away from us, by convincing their 'disciples' that they can (among multitudes of other claims) win all the time, that happiness is a destination and that they have a right to 'riches' (in any form that 'riches' may be imagined).
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #2 - Nov 25th, 2012 at 7:31pm
 
Yadda wrote on Nov 24th, 2012 at 7:54pm:
muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?


muso wrote on Nov 23rd, 2012 at 10:17pm:

It's a bit like driving.  If you thought about every single thing you did while driving, then you'd find it very difficult, because as another poster pointed out, it's done primarily using the subconscious. The conscious mind only intervenes when something is dangerous, interesting, pleasurable or important ( a hey! moment).





muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?

e.g.
What sort [i.e. what quality] of driving skills are imparted to the subconscious ?

That is; Is it those habits of the conscious mind, which [in the first place] 'instruct' the subconscious ?


muso,

Was Aristotle [below] correct ?




Quote:

We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.



Aristotle


Quote:

"It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."



Professor Dumbledore to Harry.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - J K Rowling



Quote:

There is nothing wrong that cannot be cured by what is right.


???


What we believe, determines how we will act [choose] in this life.
Yadda




Yadda, Good questions. I can give you my take on it, but as NoN said, it's easy to oversimplify.  The subconscious is  governed by the conscious mind. The subconscious has no capacity for reasoning on its own. Potentially, the subconscious is obedient to the will of the I. At the risk of some groans from certain posters, a condition where the subconscious is obedient to the "I" is known as an internal locus of control. You might have to research "Locus of control", because it's too much to explain in depth.  We all have an internal locus of control in some situations, and an external locus of control in other situations. This is highly dependent on the individual.  Those with a predominately external locus of control feel that they have no control over their lives, and are more likely to suffer from illness.

In cognitive psychology, the term "frame" or cognitive frame is used. This essay gives a reasonably good account of framing:

http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi-essay/framing

Quote:
Frames are cognitive shortcuts that people use to help make sense of complex information. Frames help us to interpret the world around us and represent that world to others. They help us organize complex phenomena into coherent, understandable categories. When we label a phenomenon, we give meaning to some aspects of what is observed, while discounting other aspects because they appear irrelevant or counter-intuitive. Thus, frames provide meaning through selective simplification, by filtering people's perceptions and providing them with a field of vision for a problem.


- but read the whole article, because it's a pretty good perspective.

So in an ideal case, it's good to be aware of the fact that we are in full control of our thoughts, feelings and attitudes, and of course our actions.  However, not many people fall into that category.

The Aristotle quotes are spot on as far as I'm concerned.

Quote:
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities.
-Aristotle



The Yadda quote is partly correct in my opinion. The muso equivalent would be something like this:

"What I think and feel determines what I do, but I can optimise what I think and feel." 

In other words, I can choose what I think, what I feel and what I do.

If I have a certain objective in life that is realistic and within my control or influence, then I can get closer to achieving that objective by controlling my thoughts and feelings.  I do this by reframing any frames that are not useful - that are preventing me from reaching my objectives.

Suffice it to say that the subconscious is always programmed by the conscious mind. Think of the subconscious as being like a CD stacker. The freshest frames are on top. To reprogram a frame, we can check it out from the subconscious mind, work on it and replace it in back the subconscious in its modified form. That's how the learning process works.   Sometimes, it needs a lot of work, and the process must be completed many times, especially with ingrained attitudes. 
Quote:
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. -Aristotle


If there is anybody with formal qualifications in cognitive psychology, please feel free to correct what I posted above. I will regard any corrections as good learnings.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 25th, 2012 at 7:58pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #3 - Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47pm
 
Yadda wrote on Nov 24th, 2012 at 7:54pm:
muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?





muso wrote on Nov 23rd, 2012 at 10:17pm:

It's a bit like driving.  If you thought about every single thing you did while driving, then you'd find it very difficult, because as another poster pointed out, it's done primarily using the subconscious. The conscious mind only intervenes when something is dangerous, interesting, pleasurable or important ( a hey! moment).





muso, is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I' [i.e. ultimately] ?

e.g.
What sort [i.e. what quality] of driving skills are imparted to the subconscious ?

That is; Is it those habits of the conscious mind, which [in the first place] 'instruct' the subconscious ?


muso,

Was Aristotle [below] correct ?




Quote:

We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.



Aristotle


Quote:

"It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."




Professor Dumbledore to Harry.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - J K Rowling



Quote:

There is nothing wrong that cannot be cured by what is right.


???




What we believe, determines how we will act [choose] in this life.
Yadda





The following is not directly relevant, but there may be some inter-connections.



Choices

Choice, it is that most human of gifts; it is what sets the human species apart from everything else on this planet.

Our capacity to understand that we can choose and our ability to act on that choice has seen humanity achieve things, previously thought impossible.

However, humanity has also evolved into a highly adversarial society, which is based primarily on a philosophy of, it must be good for me and I want it, now!

But, because what is good or right, is based on our own individual perceptions of life and our own heredity, consensus and agreement are becoming an increasingly rare commodity.

That said, there are times, often generally agreed by historians in hindsight, when human events come to a crossroad and we are now in the midst of one of those historic times.

Paramount amongst our choices, it is vital that we send a clear message that no individual, group or nation can use or threaten to use; Economic, Psychological or Physical force against any other individual, group or nation.

It is also apparent that we humans, our Politics & our Economics, are interlocked with the Environment
of the planet, whether we want or not, whether we like it or not, even whether we admit it or not and unless we act quickly, to live within our means, which means our Population must live within the means that the planet can sustain over time, then we will most likely destroy our environment & ourselves.

Of course, in the longer (planetary) term, the planet will undo the damage we may wreak upon it, but in the short-medium term, we humans & the planets environment are actually co-dependent on each other.
At present, we humans are in a headlong rush to Grow, which is reflected in our Population growth and Energy usage, over the past century or so.

The problem is that the planet is finite, as are its Resources, such as Energy (Oil, Coal, Gas etc), fresh water & capacity to feed the growing Global Population.

We are now exceeding the planets capacity to sustain us, even at current Global Population levels and unless we change our Political & Economic paradigm soon, we will push the planet too far and it will start to push back.

In short, the time has come when we are faced by stark choices, if we fail to sustain the Environment, and then the Environment will fail to sustain us!

At this point in time, we can not pass the buck, neither should we kick the can further down the road and nor can we simply print more bucks, as each of those alternatives will simply exacerbate future difficulties.

There are crucial decisions to be made and the choices we make now, will decide the future of humanity for a long, long time!

There is a need to say clearly and in a united voice that this world needs to be in better shape, to provide future generations of humanity a fair chance of survival!

Reconciliation with our past and future, information equality, fair Economic outcomes for all, an understanding that we all have responsibilities, as well as rights and that we are all interlocked in these future outcomes, are vital issues for our future.

In seeking new expectations from life, we will need the courage to traverse paths that do not yet exist and the wisdom of true leaders, who understand that short term personal gain, can not come at the expense of the best longer term interests of all, nor at the expense of failing to take the correct actions, when needed. 

The choice, as always, is ours.

So, understanding that we simply can not continue with the status quo, we need to seek the correct balance and we need to make sure that our decisions, our choices, are heard by all.

We should also remember that for every action or non-action, there are consequences and that all real change starts with you and with me, it starts with us!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #4 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:24am
 
muso wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 7:31pm:
So in an ideal case, it's good to be aware of the fact that we are in full control of our thoughts, feelings and attitudes, and of course our actions.  However, not many people fall into that category.

'Ideal' being the operative word.

Thoughts, feelings and attitudes come upon us. We can be aware of them only after they have occurred and they often cause us to act in a less than ideal (or, on afterthought, desirable) way, although some of us are better at managing them than others, no doubt about that.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21894
A cat with a view
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #5 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 9:16am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47am:
If the subconscious necessarily 'obeyed' the will of the 'I', neuroses and personality disorders would not be as chronically tenacious as they are.

But, in any event, I think that applying simplistic principles that define the interaction between the 'I' (the conscious) and the 'other' (all that is subconscious and beyond control of the 'I'), such that the 'I' becomes the 'supreme arbiter' of all we do or become, is the stuff of magical thinking.

It's also the underlying premise of those latter day, self-styled 'gurus' who profit from the innate need for many of us to believe that we can will all things good to us and all things not good away from us, by convincing their 'disciples' that they can (among multitudes of other claims) win all the time, that happiness is a destination and that they have a right to 'riches' (in any form that 'riches' may be imagined).




NoN,

I am not suggesting that the "I" [normally] has any direct control over the subconscious.

Rather i am suggesting that it is possible, that the qualities and skills that the subconscious 'acquires' [and possesses], could be influenced by the habitual choices of the conscious "I".

???
Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21894
A cat with a view
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #6 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 9:43am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

The following is not directly relevant, but there may be some inter-connections.



Choices

Choice, it is that most human of gifts; it is what sets the human species apart from everything else on this planet.

Our capacity to understand that we can choose and our ability to act on that choice has seen humanity achieve things, previously thought impossible.

......
Paramount amongst our choices, it is vital that we send a clear message that no individual, group or nation can use or threaten to use; Economic, Psychological or Physical force against any other individual, group or nation.








perceptions_now,

[Thank you for your contribution]

Good luck with that!



The problem is with that kind of thinking [i.e. "We cannot use force."], imo, is that it leads us down a path to pacifism [and impotence, and our subjugation [enslavement] by those who are willing to use force].

Surely we must retain the right to speak out, and to act, against those who wish to impose their will upon us, without our consent ?

As Locke expressed, when we [or others] seek to impose our will upon others, without their consent [in reason-ing], we are effectively trying to enslave another person [to our will].

And that is where the 'wrongness' lays, imo.



And i agree with Locke's reasoning....

"......he who attempts to get another man into his absolute power does thereby put himself into a state of war with him; it being to be understood as a declaration of a design upon his life.  For I have reason to conclude that he who would get me into his power without my consent would use me as he pleased when he had got me there, and destroy me too when he had a fancy to it; for nobody can desire to have me in his absolute power unless it be to compel me by force to that which is against the right of my freedom- i.e.  make me a slave."


John Locke 1632-170
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1242692863/0#0

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #7 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 10:47am
 
Yadda wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 9:43am:
perceptions_now wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47pm:

The following is not directly relevant, but there may be some inter-connections.



Choices

Choice, it is that most human of gifts; it is what sets the human species apart from everything else on this planet.

Our capacity to understand that we can choose and our ability to act on that choice has seen humanity achieve things, previously thought impossible.

......
Paramount amongst our choices, it is vital that we send a clear message that no individual, group or nation can use or threaten to use; Economic, Psychological or Physical force against any other individual, group or nation.








perceptions_now,

[Thank you for your contribution]

Good luck with that!



The problem is with that kind of thinking [i.e. "We cannot use force."], imo, is that it leads us down a path to pacifism [and impotence, and our subjugation [enslavement] by those who are willing to use force].

Surely we must retain the right to speak out, and to act, against those who wish to impose their will upon us, without our consent ?

As Locke expressed, when we [or others] seek to impose our will upon others, without their consent [in reason-ing], we are effectively trying to enslave another person [to our will].


And that is where the 'wrongness' lays, imo.



And i agree with Locke's reasoning....

"......he who attempts to get another man into his absolute power does thereby put himself into a state of war with him; it being to be understood as a declaration of a design upon his life.  For I have reason to conclude that he who would get me into his power without my consent would use me as he pleased when he had got me there, and destroy me too when he had a fancy to it; for nobody can desire to have me in his absolute power unless it be to compel me by force to that which is against the right of my freedom- i.e.  make me a slave."


John Locke 1632-170
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1242692863/0#0



I agree, we must retain the right not only to speak out, but to act against the use of Economic, Psychological or Physical force.

However, there are opportunities available to us, where we can act and we can do so, without employing similar types of force.

It is also worth noting that whilst Physical force may be the most apparent to the general Global Population, it is very likely that Economic & Psychological forces are most likely the most prevalent used and that is not widely recognised!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #8 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 11:16am
 
Yadda wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 9:16am:
NoN,

I am not suggesting that the "I" [normally] has any direct control over the subconscious.

Rather i am suggesting that it is possible, that the qualities and skills that the subconscious 'acquires' [and possesses], could be influenced by the habitual choices of the conscious "I".

???


I know that this was directed at NoN, but I'd go further than possible. I'd say that they are influenced by the habitual choices (contained within the frames), but that we can change those frames if we choose to do so.

The other thing that's important is that nobody can influence us unless we agree to be influenced. (Google:Die Gedanken sind frei)
Also Google the Stockdale Paradox, however there are plenty of people whom we can influence if we choose to do so. It's a fine line between influencing people for good reasons and manipulating people. There are some cognitive tricks that are not to be used lightly.   

Quote:
Stockdale was held as a prisoner of war in the Hoa Lo prison for the next seven years. Locked in leg irons in a bath stall, he was routinely tortured and beaten. When told by his captors that he was to be paraded in public, Stockdale slit his scalp with a razor to purposely disfigure himself so that his captors could not use him as propaganda. When they covered his head with a hat, he beat himself with a stool until his face was swollen beyond recognition. When Stockdale was discovered with information that could implicate his friends' "black activities", he slit his wrists so they could not torture him into confession.


James Stockdale was an example of a man with a very strong internal locus of control.

http://engine-for-change.com/weblog/2010/03/stockdale-paradox/

It's a story that you may wish to read because it's useful for strengthening your faith (regardless of whether it's faith in self or God)
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2012 at 11:22am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #9 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 10:54pm
 
Yadda wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 9:16am:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 8:47am:
If the subconscious necessarily 'obeyed' the will of the 'I', neuroses and personality disorders would not be as chronically tenacious as they are.

But, in any event, I think that applying simplistic principles that define the interaction between the 'I' (the conscious) and the 'other' (all that is subconscious and beyond control of the 'I'), such that the 'I' becomes the 'supreme arbiter' of all we do or become, is the stuff of magical thinking.

It's also the underlying premise of those latter day, self-styled 'gurus' who profit from the innate need for many of us to believe that we can will all things good to us and all things not good away from us, by convincing their 'disciples' that they can (among multitudes of other claims) win all the time, that happiness is a destination and that they have a right to 'riches' (in any form that 'riches' may be imagined).




NoN,

I am not suggesting that the "I" [normally] has any direct control over the subconscious.

Rather i am suggesting that it is possible, that the qualities and skills that the subconscious 'acquires' [and possesses], could be influenced by the habitual choices of the conscious "I".

???

There's no doubt that the conscious mind has some control... Otherwise it would be impossible to, say, give up smoking at will.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #10 - Dec 6th, 2012 at 8:38pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:24am:
muso wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 7:31pm:
So in an ideal case, it's good to be aware of the fact that we are in full control of our thoughts, feelings and attitudes, and of course our actions.  However, not many people fall into that category.

'Ideal' being the operative word.

Thoughts, feelings and attitudes come upon us. We can be aware of them only after they have occurred and they often cause us to act in a less than ideal (or, on afterthought, desirable) way, although some of us are better at managing them than others, no doubt about that.




It's good to see you both thinking like CS Lewis, even if you do not realise it. You are both talking about 'us'. 'We' are aware of our thoughts, feelings and action - whether retrospectively or not hardly matters - as long us we all think of 'us'.
And who is 'us'?

As Lewis pointed out, 'we' do not have souls. 'We' are souls.

'We' have bodies.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21894
A cat with a view
Re: is the subconscious obedient to the will of the 'I
Reply #11 - Dec 7th, 2012 at 10:47am
 
Quote:

'We' have bodies.

....'we' do not have souls. 'We' are souls.






No argument.

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print