progressiveslol wrote on Jan 1
st, 2013 at 5:52pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 1
st, 2013 at 4:43pm:
Maqqa wrote on Jan 1
st, 2013 at 8:28am:
why would affordability bother you when you've ignored Labor's 5 largest ever deficits (going on 6) and the $350B debt
All that Abbotts plans can do is add to the debt and put the next surplus further into the future unless his promises are all non core.
As said, that hasnt bothered you at all with labors spending like a drunkin sailor. Spend spend spend. The economy needs it.
Good to see you are in total acceptance of Abbotts spending, even if that spending is only in your ideological mind.
with labors spending like a drunkin sailor.The only real spending was to stimulate the economy and prevent a much more serious downturn the term spend like a drunken sailor is absolute rubbish.
So all spending is the same for you? To you there's no such thing as wastage. Cool. Then you can't complain the LIBs wasted money
Good to see you are in total acceptance of Abbotts spending, even if that spending is only in your ideological mindDAVID KOCH:
Ok. Alright. There is a bit of argument on that from both sides as we can understand.
But you said if you get elected at the next election you will overturn the carbon tax but keep the compensation. Now, after seeing what surprised everyone as a very generous compensation package, are you able to still promise that now?
What Abbott has clearly promised is not only in my ideological mind, it came directly out of Mr Abbotts ideologically driven mouth, another commitment that he can not keep because he can not afford to pay for it.
He's trying to fix a Labor mistake - the mistake was to RATIFY KYOTO. Suck it up princess