In case anyone is still reading this poorly thought out thread.
I thought I would share this logical but obviously poorly understood subject. It is short and intended for thought.
Quote:The Antarctic is a continent surrounded by ocean. As a consequence, during the summer, sea ice breaks up and drifts northward unimpeded, where the great majority of it melts every summer. This happens with or without climate change. Perhaps more significant is the thickening of the glacial ice sheet that covers the southernmost continent.
The Arctic is an ocean surrounded by land. There are few escape routes for the sea ice that forms each winter and so, although some melts each year, some stays, surviving the summer and thickening each winter. Climate alarmists would have us believe that the melting ice in the Arctic is a crisis, while the growing ice in the Antarctic is insignificant. In reality, the dynamics of both sets of pack ice are poorly understood.
In other words, it is significant that a land masse (Antartica) has its ice growing, that is unimpeeded by land to break off, escape and melt, where the Arctic is a sea masse that has land surrounding it to trap ice but is melting to normal or less extent.
There seem to be an obvious shift to a warmer north and a cooler south. That is not global. It resembles a tilt toward and away from the sun, north to south, either magnetic or axis. Not saying it is, but something to think about logically. It certainly doesnt resemble CO2 globally as we are told it has to be globally to be CO2, because co2 is not a local phenomena.