Australian Politics Forum - Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.

Back to OzPolitic.com

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28

Send Topic

Print

Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings. (Read 16932 times)

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #360 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:37pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:29pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:23pm:

has itr ever occured to you that the IPCC position is wrong? has it ever occured to yu that they act as gate-keepers to alternative opinions and research? if ACC were right then its predictions would be right or at least close. INstead, they fail miserably and we get the embarrassing nonse of IPCC saying that their temperature predictions were spot on - if you take out the natural variability and things they didnt know about. what exactly is that pitiful response?

Why is it that you are not able to construct any arguement with out telling lies?

Haven't you ever asked yourself why you need to tell lies regarding this subject?

You lied about glaciers receding.
You lied about undersea volcanos melting the arctic ice cap
You lied about the MWP being 4 degrees warmer globally than today.
You lied about the Doran 2009 survey when you claimed that only 79 scientists responded to it.
You lied about what the UK Met announced at the end of last year re their forecast for the next 5 years.

Has it ever occurred to you that if you need to continually tell lies to support your arguement - you are probably wrong?

PEOPLE THAT

REALLY LOVE CRACK

LIE TO GET IT APPARENTLY! Sad

Sad

Sad

Sad

Sad

Sad

Sad

Wink

Wink

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #361 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:37pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:33pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:27pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:20pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 5:51pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 3:47pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:02am:

You are yet to produce an argument that rejects the AGW hypothesis.

It's up to the person who came up with the hypothesis to provide the evidence and argument to back their hypothesis

That has certainly been done.

really? using what scale of judgement? the complete and total failure of all predictive model? on the abundance of junk science or open fraud?

It's the physics, goldie. Even your mate, Montford, gets the radiative physics.

thats perhaps the stupidest resonse youve made yet. the physics of Climate isnt even understood and even now we are in the midst of radical changes in the understandong of the sun's effect on climate yet you presume to claim that the hypothesis has been proven.

the most fundamental proof of any hypothesis is the ability to replicate it or in this case to use it to build predictive models. they fail - miserably. their models are a joke.

The alarmists seems to avoid the physics replacing it with "denier" tag

They are concerned with Ice Caps melting would increase sea level - but the ignore that Antarctic ice sheets only contribute 0.21mm to the increase with an error rate of 0.37mm

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #362 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #363 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

IF GRAVITY ISN'T A THEORY PROMOTED TO THE ECHELON OF LAW THEN WHAT IS IT??

Wink

Wink

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

Roll Eyes

i

-->>

STILL WAITING!!

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #364 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:42pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:33pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:27pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:20pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 5:51pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 3:47pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:02am:

You are yet to produce an argument that rejects the AGW hypothesis.

It's up to the person who came up with the hypothesis to provide the evidence and argument to back their hypothesis

That has certainly been done.

really? using what scale of judgement? the complete and total failure of all predictive model? on the abundance of junk science or open fraud?

It's the physics, goldie. Even your mate, Montford, gets the radiative physics.

thats perhaps the stupidest resonse youve made yet. the physics of Climate isnt even understood and even now we are in the midst of radical changes in the understandong of the sun's effect on climate yet you presume to claim that the hypothesis has been proven.

the most fundamental proof of any hypothesis is the ability to replicate it or in this case to use it to build predictive models. they fail - miserably. their models are a joke.

Rubbish. You don't even accept that El Niño events have a significant impact on temperatures. You don't have enough knowledge to assess whether the predictive models are a joke or not.

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #365 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

My bet is you're too scared to lay your knowledge of the science on the table.

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #366 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:48pm

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

My bet is you're too scared to lay your knowledge of the science on the table.

SMOKING CRACK MEANS BEING SCARED!

Shocked

Shocked

Shocked

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #367 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:49pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

Actually - AGW is a theory, not a hypothesis ...

When losing an argument, resort to semantics.

Lies, fear-mongering, hyperbole, Godwin's Law, semantics, colourful graphs, data manipulation. You AGW alarmists have it all. The only thing missing is science and some convincing evidence. Get back to me when you start using those two methods, OK? There's a good lad.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #368 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:52pm

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

My bet is you're too scared to lay your knowledge of the science on the table.

Lets debate the science

Antarctic melt contributing to sea level increase is 0.21mm with an error of 0.37mm

And the fact that scientist don't know what level of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere will melt the ice

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #369 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:49pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

Actually - AGW is a theory, not a hypothesis ...

When losing an argument, resort to semantics.

Lies, fear-mongering, hyperbole, Godwin's Law, semantics, colourful graphs, data manipulation. You AGW alarmists have it all. The only thing missing is science and some convincing evidence. Get back to me when you start using those two methods, OK? There's a good lad.

GREG IS CRYING, LOL!

NOTHING IS AS FUNNY AS SEEING A CRACK-SMOKER IN TEARS LOL!

EVERYONE HATES A DRUG-ADDICT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

CHEER UP GREG... THE LEARNING STARTS WHEN YOU REFUSE TO GO TO ANY MORE FUNERALS!!

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #370 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:54pm

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

I'm not playing any semantics games. My god, you don't even know the meaning of the word.

This guy is resorting to 'Hitler' and 'gravity' in order to support the AGW hypothesis.

You can't see how ridiculous that is? You can't see how that destroys his credibility?

The AGW religion is slowly dying because of ignorant fools like him. You really should have him removed from the church if you want to keep pushing your agenda with any level of success.

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #371 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:55pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

Answer the question Greggery.

Do you understand that, just like AGW:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Just yes or no Greggery. I always answer your questions.

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #372 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:56pm

Maqqa wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:52pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

My bet is you're too scared to lay your knowledge of the science on the table.

Lets debate the science

Antarctic melt contributing to sea level increase is 0.21mm with an error of 0.37mm

And the fact that scientist don't know what level of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere will melt the ice

So what's the current annual rise in sea levels, Maqqa?

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #373 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:57pm

Maqqa wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:52pm:

MOTR wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

greggery, you must have one massive insecurity complex. Rather than debate the science all you want to do is get caught up in this ridiculous game of semantics.

My bet is you're too scared to lay your knowledge of the science on the table.

Lets debate the science

Antarctic melt contributing to sea level increase is 0.21mm with an error of 0.37mm

And the fact that scientist don't know what level of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere will melt the ice

What ice are you talking about?
And why do you think whatever this ice is is relevant?

THe majority of sea level rise that will impact on human societies in the coming years will be from thermal expansion. Not melting ice.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

male

Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #374 - Jan 13^th, 2013 at 7:00pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Is that right Greggery?

LOL This is priceless. Absolutely priceless. You're even funnier than that deathrides character.

I always thought you were a little bit ignorant on this subject, but this has destroyed any shred of credibility you may have had left.

First Hitler, and now the old "gravity" comparison.

Oh god, my sides are splitting from laughing so much.

Grin

Grin

Answer the question Greggery.

Do you understand that, just like AGW:

* Gravity is a theory; and

* It may be correct, or it may be incorrect.

Just yes or no Greggery. I always answer your questions.

You won't be getting any further answers from me Bunny. Sorry old boy.

Once you resorted to 'Hitler' and 'gravity' you revealed yourself as the troll you really are (or incredibly naive and stupid - you decide which one).

From now on I won't be replying to any of your posts.

I'm dealing with intelligent adults in the future, so I'm afraid that excludes you (and your friend deathrides).

'Hitler' and 'Gravity' LOL You wanted to be taken seriously, yet you failed so spectacularly.

Goodbye my unscientific little friend.

Grin

Grin

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28

Send Topic

Print

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge