Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28
Send Topic Print
Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings. (Read 16898 times)
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #60 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:40am
 
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:37am:
FRED. wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:17am:
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:14am:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:12am:
As long as it sounds sophisticated and appears to create doubt about warming or an anthropogenic forcing, progs will paste it.


Yeh thats a good rebuttal. So tell us all how ice floating on water and melting, changes the water level. Would love to hear this new scientific evidence.


Don't put ICE in your  drink when it  melts  it flows all over the bar  Wink


Looks like you've got a buddy, progs. If you read what the scientists are saying you'll find this particular analogy doesn't fit the situation.

Never does follow science or laws of physics does it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #61 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:44am
 
How about you read the article, progs. It's not as if these scientist didn't pass 5th class science.

Here's some moving pictures that might help with your comprehension.

Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74520
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #62 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 10:06am
 
Denialists don't want to believe no matter how much evidence you provide ...  there is no amount of evidence that would satisfy them.

Like the old saying goes, 'you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' ... in the case of progs and longlooser, it's more jackass' than horses.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #63 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 11:04am
 
John Smith wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 10:06am:
Denialists don't want to believe no matter how much evidence you provide ...  there is no amount of evidence that would satisfy them.

Like the old saying goes, 'you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' ... in the case of progs and longlooser, it's more jackass' than horses.


What exactly are we "denying"
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #64 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 11:12am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:40am:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:37am:
FRED. wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:17am:
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:14am:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:12am:
As long as it sounds sophisticated and appears to create doubt about warming or an anthropogenic forcing, progs will paste it.


Yeh thats a good rebuttal. So tell us all how ice floating on water and melting, changes the water level. Would love to hear this new scientific evidence.


Don't put ICE in your  drink when it  melts  it flows all over the bar  Wink


Looks like you've got a buddy, progs. If you read what the scientists are saying you'll find this particular analogy doesn't fit the situation.

Never does follow science or laws of physics does it.



Interesting isn't it?

The alarmists are saying that global warming cause the polar ice caps to melt - therefore sea level will rise

but if melting ice does not overflow the glass then how does that increase sea level?

if you filled a cup to 7/10 full and freeze it - chances are the resulting ice would reach nearer to the rim of the cup. Lets say its now 9/10 of the cup

If we melt it sitting inside the same cup - does it go down to 7/10?

If so - would this then translate into the real world where melting ice actually reduce sea level rather than increasing it?
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #65 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:08pm
 
1. Try the experiment is salt water, Maqqa.  Wink
2. You do understand they are talking about the ice that is slipping off the continent.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #66 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:27pm
 
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:12am:
As long as it sounds sophisticated and appears to create doubt about warming or an anthropogenic forcing, progs will paste it.



and you dont??? yuo are still denying that warming has stopped.. which frankly makes you a DENIER since even the hysterics (except Hansen who just makes stuff up now) admit there has been NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT WARMING for 16 years.

but the only response I get from you is deflection to a different topic.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #67 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:29pm
 
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:37am:
FRED. wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:17am:
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:14am:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:12am:
As long as it sounds sophisticated and appears to create doubt about warming or an anthropogenic forcing, progs will paste it.


Yeh thats a good rebuttal. So tell us all how ice floating on water and melting, changes the water level. Would love to hear this new scientific evidence.


Don't put ICE in your  drink when it  melts  it flows all over the bar  Wink


Looks like you've got a buddy, progs. If you read what the scientists are saying you'll find this particular analogy doesn't fit the situation.

Don't ever add ice to a drink full to the brim, you'll get your coaster wet.  Wink


not exactly critical analysis. ice floatin in water does NOT add to the water level when it melts.  I think I learned that in grade ONE science.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #68 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:29pm
 
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:08pm:
1. Try the experiment is salt water, Maqqa.  Wink
2. You do understand they are talking about the ice that is slipping off the continent.



So how does an Australian Carbon Tax change this?
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74520
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #69 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:30pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 11:04am:
John Smith wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 10:06am:
Denialists don't want to believe no matter how much evidence you provide ...  there is no amount of evidence that would satisfy them.

Like the old saying goes, 'you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' ... in the case of progs and longlooser, it's more jackass' than horses.


What exactly are we "denying"


the truth
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #70 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:30pm
 
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:44am:
How about you read the article, progs. It's not as if these scientist didn't pass 5th class science.

Here's some moving pictures that might help with your comprehension.



so ice sheets collapsing is a new event that has never happened before???? what happened for centuries past??? IGNORANCE of what was happening and nothing more. Now that we know that ice shelves collapse we get outselves in a panic because we think we know what is happening - and we dont.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #71 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:31pm
 
gold_medal wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:29pm:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:37am:
FRED. wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:17am:
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:14am:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 9:12am:
As long as it sounds sophisticated and appears to create doubt about warming or an anthropogenic forcing, progs will paste it.


Yeh thats a good rebuttal. So tell us all how ice floating on water and melting, changes the water level. Would love to hear this new scientific evidence.


Don't put ICE in your  drink when it  melts  it flows all over the bar  Wink


Looks like you've got a buddy, progs. If you read what the scientists are saying you'll find this particular analogy doesn't fit the situation.

Don't ever add ice to a drink full to the brim, you'll get your coaster wet.  Wink


not exactly critical analysis. ice floatin in water does NOT add to the water level when it melts.  I think I learned that in grade ONE science.


Well you're in for a surprise when you do Maqqa's little experiment with salt water and fresh water ice cubes.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #72 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:32pm
 
John Smith wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 10:06am:
Denialists don't want to believe no matter how much evidence you provide ...  there is no amount of evidence that would satisfy them.

Like the old saying goes, 'you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' ... in the case of progs and longlooser, it's more jackass' than horses.


the problem is that in the words of one of the worlds leading climate scientists 'THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT AGW'
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74520
Gender: male
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #73 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:32pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:29pm:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:08pm:
1. Try the experiment is salt water, Maqqa.  Wink
2. You do understand they are talking about the ice that is slipping off the continent.



So how does an Australian Carbon Tax change this?


you get to pay for the privilege of destroying the planet as we know it, instead of getting away with it for free.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Deniers nailed misrepresenting IPCC findings.
Reply #74 - Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:35pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:29pm:
MOTR wrote on Dec 31st, 2012 at 12:08pm:
1. Try the experiment is salt water, Maqqa.  Wink
2. You do understand they are talking about the ice that is slipping off the continent.



So how does an Australian Carbon Tax change this?


Using a price single is the most efficient way to to reduce emissions for any economy.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28
Send Topic Print