Maybe we can take credit for Mexico's global warming legislation which includes a mandate to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by 30% below business-as-usual levels by 2020, and by 50% below 2000 levels by 2050.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=mexico-approves-landmark-climat...Or South Korea's carbon trading system, which like Mexico's was passed with
broad bipartisan support earlier this year.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/02/us-carbon-korea-idUSBRE8410TN20120502We can't take credit for California's new cap and trade system, because that has been in the pipeline for sometime.
However, according to progs' logic we can take credit for South Africa's planned carbon tax, which begins in 2013, and Japan's planned carbon tax, which will be phased in between 2013 and 2016.
Although perhaps we should step back and allow the real pioneers, British Colombia, NZ and the EU to take the credit.
What progs' post clearly shows us is that those countries that stall will clearly create ammunition for other countries to stall. If we want a global agreement we can't afford to be half assed.
Abbott's threat to dismantle the our carbon pricing scheme is a threat to us all.