freediver wrote on Jan 5
th, 2013 at 8:28am:
Quote:If the political parties miss out of a few votes then welcome to a a true democracy, just like they have in nearly every other first world country.
Bigol would you mind giving a definition of a 'true' democracy?
Quote:i've never seen any non-dodgy argument for compulsory voting for any of its do-gooder boosters, ever.
Perhaps you should read before commenting then Denton.
Quote:Take the time to look back at this post and you will see the type of country that forces its citizens to the polls and you decide if that company is acceptable.
Bigol, argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy. Are you actually going to address the logical flaws in your argument, or just repeat yourself ad nauseum?
Quote:BTW it is up to you to support your own statements.
Bit rich that you demand I argue my case when you are too friggen lazy to come up with these supposed western democracies (35 in total) that utilise compulsory voting, the reason you cannot is they don't friggen exist.
BTW using "argumentum ad populum" ad nauseum doesn't make it so without the underlying proof that the majority of first world democracies are wrong to believe in basic human rights are the cornerstone of a solid democracy, ya tool.
I know you have found a new latin phrase that you want to use until it is a worn out hackneyed old phrase (now) but you need to have some foundation for your argument to have any sort of credibility.
I'm fine using the UN Human Rights charter as the basis for mine.