Quote:Nice how none of them are 'western' democracies, south amercian dictatorships, african sh1tholes and middle eastern backwaters, all one minute from being taken over by a military coup.
Oh dear. He still isn't even aware of the rest of the list.
Quote:It's not about people being too lazy to vote. It's a matter of choice, we are not given a choice.
I would love nothing better than to tick the box
"None of the above"
Pansi, you can always write that box on the ballot paper and tick it. Or draw a picture of a donkey. So there you go, you have that choice.
Quote:but I don't get a choice because our pollies are too afraid of the truth, they expect us to vote for one or the other, which is forcing the issue.
When was the last time there were only two candidates on your ballot paper?
Quote:Don't start with the old rant about being able to vote for any of the candidates in my electorate, the vote inevitably goes back to libs or labor.
Pansi, this is because it is nearly always Liberal or Labor that gets elected. This does not mean you do not have a choice to vote for other candidates. It merely means that they lose because they are unpopular. If it helps, instead of thinking of it as preferential voting, think of it as a series of runoff elections. This is how most foreigners refer to our system - instant runoff voting. It makes a lot more sense and helps avoid some of this confusion about what your vote means.