Australian Politics Forum - Global cooling

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #105 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:11pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists. If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.

Wow, just wow, talk about dumb, lucky confusionalists are a dying breed.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #106 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:16pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists. If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.

Yep, their religion is called AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) yet if anything other than warming is discussed they immediately change their tune to "climate change".

The problem is, they are so frightened by the preachings of this religion that they have lost all capacity to think rationally. It's sad to see so many people scared so utterly senseless.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #107 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:32pm

skippy. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:11pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists. If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.

Wow, just wow, talk about dumb, lucky confusionalists are a dying breed.

actually, dopey, the sceptics are winning the debate and the fight for public opinion. The majority no longer believes are are to blame for warming. Probably the lack of it happening isn't helping!

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #108 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists. If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.

Yep, their religion is called AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) yet if anything other than warming is discussed they immediately change their tune to "climate change".

The problem is, they are so frightened by the preachings of this religion that they have lost all capacity to think rationally. It's sad to see so many people scared so utterly senseless.

there certainly is a lack of rational thinking. But worse, there is a high degree of blatant manipulation of data, false reports, fraud and intimidation. Science is getting a bloody nose from this because ultimately other disciplines are going to look liek the schmucks that climate scientist are looking like now. Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #109 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:40pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:32pm:

actually, dopey, the sceptics are winning the debate ...

That's because the sceptics are willing to actually have a debate.

The AGW alarmists think there's no need for debate. They refuse to give serious consideration to anything that goes against their hypothesis and they come out with ridiculous statements like "it's beyond doubt".

They abandon all scientific reasoning and instead cling to their hypothesis with nothing more than faith (based on irrational fear).

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #110 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:32pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:11pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists. If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.

Wow, just wow, talk about dumb, lucky confusionalists are a dying breed.

actually, dopey, the sceptics are winning the debate and the fight for public opinion. The majority no longer believes are are to blame for warming. Probably the lack of it happening isn't helping!

LIAR show me one opinion poll that supports your lies? Or it's just more bullshi t from a sad old man of questionable character.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137490 Gender:	Re: Global cooling Reply #111 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm: Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse. Exactly!
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #112 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:03pm:

The subject DUMB-BUNNY is global warming - a topic you refuse to address because the preoponderance of eveidence proferred here disproves it. If you were half the person you thin kyou are you would answer the questions put forward liek the above one.

Yes - and in trying to make a point - you told an outright lie.

You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

NB - that was only the first of several factually incorrect statements you made in post #39 of this thread:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1357287527/39#39

But since you have a habit of running away from direct questions - we will address these one at a time. You have been shown that your statement was incorrect and you have been asked over and over again to provide evidence to support your statement.

Since you are incapable of providing any evidence whatsoever to support your statement - we can only assume you are a liar.

Now - Please provide evidence to support your statement :

"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

When you have either done that or apologised to the forum for telling lies - then we will move onto the other factually incorrect statements you have been making.

We are waiting

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #113 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm:

Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Exactly!

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Did Alan Jones tell you that?

Could you tell us which journals have stopped accepting papers relating to climate science?
Please name them.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137490 Gender:	Re: Global cooling Reply #114 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:47pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm: ... we can only assume you are a liar. We know for a fact that you're a liar Bunny Boy. "beyond doubt" was a big fat lie, and you kept repeating it. You really should stop throwing those stones around in your glass house Bunny.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:53pm by greggerypeccary » IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #115 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #116 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:53pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm:

Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Exactly!

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Did Alan Jones tell you that?

Could you tell us which journals have stopped accepting papers relating to climate science?
Please name them.

Nature - unless it supports ACC

are you that uninformed or one-eyed that you arent aware of the argument raging ovr gatea-keeping at some scientific journals?? did you even read some of those CRU emails?

you are remarkably uninformed

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #117 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:55pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm:

Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Exactly!

I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #118 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:56pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

ouch... this should be good.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137490 Gender:	Re: Global cooling Reply #119 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:57pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm: Did Alan Jones tell you that? Childish (incorrect) assumption there Bunny. I'm a lefty: on the far left actually. Why would I be listening to a demented right wing broadcaster? Stick to the facts Bunny: lies and assumptions are making you look very silly.
Back to top	IP Logged