Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Global cooling
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Global cooling (Read 18421 times)
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #120 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:00pm  
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:01pm:
I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

What is it you don't understand about this?

Do you have any understanding of how weather and climate works? From your statement above, I assume not - so I will try to keep things simple for you.

"Weather" is essentially what we see as a result of atmospheric temperature and pressure diffentials.  If you add more energy to the system - the differences in temperature and pressure increase.  More heat energy in the system also means more evaporation.  And warmer air has the ability to hold more water vapour than colder air.

So - what a warmer atmosphere means, is that climate has greater variability.  Generally - the dry times in dry places will become drier.  The wet times in wet places will become wetter.  And extremes of temperature and precipitation will become more frequent.

If you have any specific questions I would be happy to answer them for you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104688
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #121 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:02pm  


gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.



I hope you use a spell check on that paper?  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #122 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:02pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:57pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Did Alan Jones tell you that?




Childish (incorrect) assumption there Bunny.

I'm a lefty: on the far left actually.

Why would I be listening to a demented right wing broadcaster?

Stick to the facts Bunny: lies and assumptions are making you look very silly.



I assume you would be listening to a demented right wing broadcaster because you sound exactly like a demented right wing broadcaster.

You claimed that "Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse."

Could you tell us which journals have stopped accepting papers relating to climate science?
Please name them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #123 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:03pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.

Yes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #124 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:05pm  
Bobby. wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.



I hope you use a spell check on that paper?  Grin


Hes gonna get Alan Jones to proof read it for him  Cheesy
Back to top
 
Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #125 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm  
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:56pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.





ouch... this should be good.



Unfortunately, I don't think he has the intestinal fortitude to answer the question with a simple 'yes' or 'no'.


But we'll give him another chance:

So Bunny, is there any possibility at all that the AGW hypothesis might be incorrect?  Yes, or No?  Simple question.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #126 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm  
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.

Ha ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha v!!!!!!!!! Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Who do you think you are fooling?!?!?

Who would be interested in reading the opinions of a liar?

A liar who is completely clueless about the subject he is trying to discuss?!?!?!


We haven't forgotten the lies you told.

We are still waiting for an explanation.

Let's start with the first one:
You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #127 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:56pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.





ouch... this should be good.



Unfortunately, I don't think he has the intestinal fortitude to answer the question with a simple 'yes' or 'no'.


But we'll give him another chance:

So Bunny, is there any possibility at all that the AGW hypothesis might be incorrect?  Yes, or No?  Simple question.



look up
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #128 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:08pm  
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:03pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.

Yes



Ah!

I take back the "intestinal fortitude" comment then.

You have finally gained my respect.

Well done.

If only other disciples were as honest as you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #129 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:12pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:56pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.





ouch... this should be good.



Unfortunately, I don't think he has the intestinal fortitude to answer the question with a simple 'yes' or 'no'.


But we'll give him another chance:

So Bunny, is there any possibility at all that the AGW hypothesis might be incorrect?  Yes, or No?  Simple question.




Even if its 50/50 (which it isn't) only a fool would keep pumping pollution into the atmosphere just because they don't have the courage to admit they could be wrong.
Back to top
 
Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh07
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #130 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:12pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm:
Unfortunately, I don't think he has the intestinal fortitude to answer the question with a simple 'yes' or 'no'.




Where is your "intestinal fortitude" Greggery?

You claimed that "Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse."

Could you tell us which journals have stopped accepting papers relating to climate science?
Please name them.

Simple question

And there was another simple question your didn't answer.  Your wrote:
The terms AGW and climate change are not interchangeable.  AGW alarmists think they are.

Who are these "AGW alarmists" that think the terms AGW and climate change are interchangeable?

I asked you to name them.  Give us an example. You did not have the "intestinal fortitude" to answer Greggery.

I can answer your questions Greggery.  Why can't you answer mine?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #131 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:12pm  
Bobby. wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.



I hope you use a spell check on that paper?  Grin


it gets edited many many times.my last book of 90000 words had two typos left in it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #132 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:13pm  
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:07pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.

Ha ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha  ha v!!!!!!!!! Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Who do you think you are fooling?!?!?

Who would be interested in reading the opinions of a liar?

A liar who is completely clueless about the subject he is trying to discuss?!?!?!


We haven't forgotten the lies you told.

We are still waiting for an explanation.

Let's start with the first one:
You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.



so you still cant ask the questions can you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #133 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:14pm  
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:03pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?



Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example.  Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'?  Simple question.

Yes


first decent answer youve given yet.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104688
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Global cooling
Reply #134 - Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:15pm  
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:12pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 6th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.



Exactly!




I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.



I hope you use a spell check on that paper?  Grin


it gets edited many many times.my last book of 90000 words had two typos left in it.



So you are now claiming to write books?

Wonders never cease with you.
Last we heard you were a Bible scholar.

You certainly are a man of many talents.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 17
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge