Australian Politics Forum - Global cooling

Back to OzPolitic.com

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Global cooling

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 17

Send Topic

Print

Global cooling (Read 18438 times)

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #135 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:15pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:13pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:07pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm:

Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Exactly!

I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha v!!!!!!!!! Grin

Grin

Grin

Grin

Grin

Grin

Grin

Who do you think you are fooling?!?!?

Who would be interested in reading the opinions of a liar?

A liar who is completely clueless about the subject he is trying to discuss?!?!?!

We haven't forgotten the lies you told.

We are still waiting for an explanation.

Let's start with the first one:
You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

so you still cant ask the questions can you?

I am asking you why you told a lie.

Why did you tell a lie?
Why do you lack - as Greggery would say - the "intestinal fortitude" to man up and admit that you are a liar.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #136 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:08pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Yes

Ah!

I take back the "intestinal fortitude" comment then.

You have finally gained my respect.

Well done.

If only other disciples were as honest as you.

I wouldn't use 'honest' just yet. after all there is an alternative hypothesis: that the warming is natural and just part of the repeated climatic cycle. but he wont accept it despite the evidence.

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #137 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:17pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:14pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Yes

first decent answer youve given yet.

Still waiting for one from you liar.

You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

How many times have you backed away from that simple question now?
Do you simply enjoy telling iies

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #138 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:18pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:08pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Yes

Ah!

I take back the "intestinal fortitude" comment then.

You have finally gained my respect.

Well done.

If only other disciples were as honest as you.

I wouldn't use 'honest' just yet. after all there is an alternative hypothesis: that the warming is natural and just part of the repeated climatic cycle. but he wont accept it despite the evidence.

Do you even know what the word "honest" means?

You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

Still waiting.....

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #139 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:19pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:02pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:35pm:

Where every other discipline openly accepts and asks for criticism, climate science does the reverse.

Exactly!

I am working on a papaer I hope will be published in a scientific journal (if I ever finish it). My previous writings and book have been debated and criticisde openly and I am taking some of that criticism on board to build a better hypothesis and new paper.

Thats how real science works.

I hope you use a spell check on that paper? Grin

Grin

it gets edited many many times.my last book of 90000 words had two typos left in it.

So you are now claiming to write books?

Wonders never cease with you.
Last we heard you were a Bible scholar.

You certainly are a man of many talents.

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137490
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #140 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Who are these "AGW alarmists" that think the terms AGW and climate change are interchangeable?

There are many here on this forum.

They're all around you.

You can accept it, or you can go on denying it.

The fact is, I couldn't care less either way. In fact, I'll retract the statement if you like. It's not important to me at all.

Now that you've admitted that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect, everything else is irrelevant to me.

All I wanted to hear from you was that "Yes".

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 104688
Melbourne
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #141 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:24pm

Gold_medal,
Quote:

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

Did you all hear that?

Longweekend is an intellectual.

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #142 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:01pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:18pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:08pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Yes

Ah!

I take back the "intestinal fortitude" comment then.

You have finally gained my respect.

Well done.

If only other disciples were as honest as you.

I wouldn't use 'honest' just yet. after all there is an alternative hypothesis: that the warming is natural and just part of the repeated climatic cycle. but he wont accept it despite the evidence.

Do you even know what the word "honest" means?

You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

Still waiting.....

I think Longy probably meant "receding", which of course is incorrect, THE GLACIERS ARE STILL RECEDING!

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57495243/continental-u.s-glaciers-recedin...

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #143 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:03pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:24pm:

Gold_medal,
Quote:

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

Did you all hear that?

Longweekend is an intellectual.

finally. you worked it out.

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #144 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:05pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:24pm:

Gold_medal,
Quote:

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

Did you all hear that?

Longweekend is an intellectual.

No, that not it at all!

Longy meant to say, he is an idiot, BUT he just misspelt the word?

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 104688
Melbourne
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #145 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:27pm

perceptions_now wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:24pm:

Gold_medal,
Quote:

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

Did you all hear that?

Longweekend is an intellectual.

No, that not it at all!

Longy meant to say, he is an idiot, BUT he just misspelt the word?

He's always boasting about achievements which can never be proven on an anonymous forum.
I could say that I was an astronaut & went to the Moon & who could deny it?

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #146 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Who are these "AGW alarmists" that think the terms AGW and climate change are interchangeable?

There are many here on this forum.

They're all around you.

You can accept it, or you can go on denying it.

Name them and quote them.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

The fact is, I couldn't care less either way. In fact, I'll retract the statement if you like. It's not important to me at all.

The fact is you made that up and were caught telling a lie.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

Now that you've admitted that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect, everything else is irrelevant to me.

All I wanted to hear from you was that "Yes".

AGW is a theory. Not a hypothesis.

[/quote]

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #147 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:32pm

perceptions_now wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:01pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:18pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:08pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

Really Greggery?

Why do you say that?

Yes Bunny, really: because it's true.

You're a perfect example. Or are you?

We can answer that question now, quite easily, with another question:

Do you accept that there's a possibility that the AGW hypothesis could be wrong, and that one day it could be replaced with another "currently accepted hypothesis"?

'Yes' or 'No'? Simple question.

Yes

Ah!

I take back the "intestinal fortitude" comment then.

You have finally gained my respect.

Well done.

If only other disciples were as honest as you.

I wouldn't use 'honest' just yet. after all there is an alternative hypothesis: that the warming is natural and just part of the repeated climatic cycle. but he wont accept it despite the evidence.

Do you even know what the word "honest" means?

You wrote:
"actually glaciers have stopped recending,"

Please provide evidence to support that statement or apologise for lying to the forum.

Still waiting.....

I think Longy probably meant "receding", which of course is incorrect, THE GLACIERS ARE STILL RECEDING!

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57495243/continental-u.s-glaciers-recedin...

Yes. You are correct.

But he came out and made a completely incorrect statement of fact - and has since been too gutless to own up to the fact that he was 100% wrong.

Of course - that was simply his first 100% incorrect statement of fact. There are many more. As soon as he admits he was wrong about the first, we will move on to the others.

But being correct is not important to him. He just throws out nonsense and then runs away when questioned about it.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #148 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:34pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:27pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:24pm:

Gold_medal,
Quote:

I am sure the concept of a person having multiple skills and abilities amazes you but there are quite a lot of us out there. Yes, I have written and published one book (non-fiction science) and failed to publish a fiction novel. I am also a biblical expert (esp compared to you dunderheads) and am currently working on a paper I hope will be published but will form the basis of my next book. I also hope to put together some presentations on my work for the US market perhaps in 2014/15.

its not that rare you know. I don't have my PhD and I don't think working on it will gain me anything. That said, if my current research is deemed valuable I may in the future take that route for my own benefit.

Did you all hear that?

Longweekend is an intellectual.

No, that not it at all!

Longy meant to say, he is an idiot, BUT he just misspelt the word?

He's always boasting about achievements which can never be proven on an anonymous forum.
I could say that I was an astronaut & went to the Moon & who could deny it?

you sound like an idiot, act like and idiot and post like an idiot. That is why no one believes you even went to university except as a gardener. Your posts would reflect your education if you had actually had one.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #149 - Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:34pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 6:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Who are these "AGW alarmists" that think the terms AGW and climate change are interchangeable?

There are many here on this forum.

They're all around you.

You can accept it, or you can go on denying it.

Name them and quote them.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

The fact is, I couldn't care less either way. In fact, I'll retract the statement if you like. It's not important to me at all.

The fact is you made that up and were caught telling a lie.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

Now that you've admitted that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect, everything else is irrelevant to me.

All I wanted to hear from you was that "Yes".

AGW is a theory. Not a hypothesis.

[/quote]

and a failed one. GW is true. AGW is not.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 17

Send Topic

Print

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge