Australian Politics Forum - Global cooling

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #240 - Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Back to top

IP Logged

john_g Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1549 Gender:	Re: Global cooling Reply #241 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:45am I'll start believing in this BS when we get 35 + days in Autumn and/or Winter. Until then, nil interest. Who would have expected hot weather in Summer? Say it ain't so!
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global cooling
Reply #242 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:53am

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Stick the homoginised data where it belongs. In the cults bin.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #243 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:57am

Karnal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:46pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:06pm:

Record temps man, Its a once in a 4000 million year event Grin

But according to confusionalists the world is only five thousand years old.

That’s true, Skippy. The alarmist evolutionists like to pretend there’s a consensus on this issue as well. Even Alan concedes the Book of Leviticus contains scientific evidence about the age of God’s creation.

These leftards will finally come around when Matty is proved right in 2013. We know one thing:

THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT MR ABBOTT LEADS.

Actually it was James Ussher who, in 1650, came up with the idea that the Earth was only 5000 years old..The Bible doesn't actually give any age..

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #244 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:49pm

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:53am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Stick the homoginised data where it belongs. In the cults bin.

Heh! And you wonder why you are called a denier!

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global cooling
Reply #245 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:50pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:49pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:53am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Stick the homoginised data where it belongs. In the cults bin.

Heh! And you wonder why you are called a denier!

Yes I do deny the legitimate use of homoginised data. The homoginisation is not peer-reviewed.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #246 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:51pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:57am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:46pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:06pm:

Record temps man, Its a once in a 4000 million year event Grin

But according to confusionalists the world is only five thousand years old.

That’s true, Skippy. The alarmist evolutionists like to pretend there’s a consensus on this issue as well. Even Alan concedes the Book of Leviticus contains scientific evidence about the age of God’s creation.

These leftards will finally come around when Matty is proved right in 2013. We know one thing:

THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT MR ABBOTT LEADS.

Actually it was James Ussher who, in 1650, came up with the idea that the Earth was only 5000 years old..The Bible doesn't actually give any age..

and he was ridiculed for it as well. The Bible does sorta give an age in Genesis chapter one:

"In the beginning..."

The Bible doesnt give a specific age to the earth. IN fact culture at that time was very disintinerested in such matters.

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #247 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 4:02pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:57am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:46pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:06pm:

Record temps man, Its a once in a 4000 million year event Grin

But according to confusionalists the world is only five thousand years old.

That’s true, Skippy. The alarmist evolutionists like to pretend there’s a consensus on this issue as well. Even Alan concedes the Book of Leviticus contains scientific evidence about the age of God’s creation.

These leftards will finally come around when Matty is proved right in 2013. We know one thing:

THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT MR ABBOTT LEADS.

Actually it was James Ussher who, in 1650, came up with the idea that the Earth was only 5000 years old..The Bible doesn't actually give any age..

Yet many god bothering morons believe this, it is after all preached in many churches and linked to the bible.

Quote:

How old is the earth according to the Bible?

Quick-read this article:
The Bible is clear that Adam, the first man, lived only 6000 years ago. Adam was created on the sixth day of God's Creation Week, so according to the Bible the earth must be only 6000 years old too.

HOW OLD is the earth according to the Bible? The following timeline by Theodore Pederson appeared in The Christian News, March 26, 2001, page 18.

How old is the earth?
If we go back 500 years, we come to the time of Martin Luther (born in 1483), and Columbus, who “sailed the ocean blue in 1492.”
If we go back 1000 years, we come to the time of Leif Ericson, Christian explorer, who preached Christ to pagans. (World Book, 1983, vol.6, page 270.)
If we go back 2000 years, we come to the birth of Jesus Christ. Our calendar is dated from His birth.
If we go back 3000 years, we come to the time of David and Solomon; they ruled Israel about 1000 BC.
If we go back 4000 years, we come to the time of Abraham (2000 BC), ancestor of Arabs and Jews.
If we go back 5000 years, we come to the time of Enoch, who “walked with God 300 years … and God took him [into Heaven].”
If we go back 6000 years, we come to the time of Creation, and Adam and Eve (4004 BC). Luke, evangelist and historian, records Adam as the first man (Luke 3:38).
The earth is about 6000 years old. Let God's people rejoice in Him who made them! (Psalm 149

the bible Claims Adam lived 6 thousand years ago, bible bashers claim Adam was created in the first week of the earths life, I rest my case. Roll Eyes

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95751
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #248 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 4:25pm

It just happens to be true, Skippy, but I'm happy to debate these awful leftards on this issue.

I'm not close-minded on this subject at all. I welcome free debate - quite unlike the global-warming alarmists who pretend there's a scientific consensus on God's plan for the world.

Remember, there is a finite date on this planet - a date when He will return and separate the sheep from the goats. Some put it at 2013, but I'm a little more conservative on this issue. We can all agree that His return will be thunderous.

Seriously - why would anyone bother about global warming when Mr Abbott's coming to power in 2013? He'll restore decency, integrity and manners to Australian politics. The climate alarmists will take their bat and ball and go home. Good riddance to bad rubbish.We'll be glad to see the back of them.

Matty will come back from New Zealand and get back into politics again. For some reason, a number of posters seem to have disappeared - Woof Woof, Shane B, Lynn, Phallic Baldwin, Blackadder, etc, etc, etc.

Let's hope they're back in 2013 when Mr Abbott gets in and Matty returns. Then we can restore some decent debate to this site.

Thoughts?

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #249 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 4:51pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 4:25pm:

It just happens to be true, Skippy, but I'm happy to debate these awful leftards on this issue.

I'm not close-minded on this subject at all. I welcome free debate - quite unlike the global-warming alarmists who pretend there's a scientific consensus on God's plan for the world.

Remember, there is a finite date on this planet - a date when He will return and separate the sheep from the goats. Some put it at 2013, but I'm a little more conservative on this issue. We can all agree that His return will be thunderous.

Seriously - why would anyone bother about global warming when Mr Abbott's coming to power in 2013? He'll restore decency, integrity and manners to Australian politics. The climate alarmists will take their bat and ball and go home. Good riddance to bad rubbish.We'll be glad to see the back of them.

Matty will come back from New Zealand and get back into politics again. For some reason, a number of posters seem to have disappeared - Woof Woof, Shane B, Lynn, Phallic Baldwin, Blackadder, etc, etc, etc.

Let's hope they're back in 2013 when Mr Abbott gets in and Matty returns. Then we can restore some decent debate to this site.

Thoughts?

Yes I wonder where all of those posters are, alas we have a brand new member KJT1981, who has never posted here before under numerous other nicks, cough cough. I wish Matty and his chumps would have taken poor old cods for a holiday too, she really seems to need one.
On the subject of global warming I'm bloody surprised the likes of hairy chested gold medallions is not shouting from the roof tops that this is gods way and the world will end in flames as explained in that first edition of MAD magazine, known as the bible.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #250 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 5:49pm

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:49pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:53am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Stick the homoginised data where it belongs. In the cults bin.

Heh! And you wonder why you are called a denier!

Yes I do deny the legitimate use of homoginised data. The homoginisation is not peer-reviewed.

Yes - ignorance and denial do go hand in hand. Thanks for reminding us:

Homogenization of Climate Data: Review and New Perspectives Using Geostatistics
A homogeneous climate time series is defined as one where the variations are caused only by variations in climate (Aguilar et al. 2003). Non-climatic factors may hide the true climatic signals and patterns, and thus potentially bias the conclusions of cli- mate and hydrological studies. Frequent factors are monitoring stations relocations, changes in instrumentation, changes of the surroundings, instrumental inaccuracies, and changes of observational and calculation procedures. Unfortunately, few long- term climate time series are free of irregularities (Auer et al. 2005). Consequently, it is an important task to assess the homogeneity of long climate records before they can be reliably used.

http://www.homogenisation.org/files/private/WG1/Bibliography/Comparisons_and_Rev...

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global cooling
Reply #251 - Jan 10^th, 2013 at 9:28pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 5:49pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:49pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 12:53am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 11:16pm:

gold_medal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 4:27pm:

except they dont. you are really pathetic. hanging on desperately to any insult since your logical arguments left you years ago.

Heh!!

THis is coming from the bloke that thinks there has been "no warming for 16 years"!?!?!

333 consecutive months of above average global temperatures - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
The last month with a below average temperature was February 1985, nearly 28 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/11
12 of the warmest years ever recorded occurred in the past 16 years - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enso-global-temp-anomalies.png
THe warmest year ever recorded was 2010 - 3 years ago - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20110112_globalstats.html
Last year, 2012 - was the warmest La Nina year ever recorded - but you say there has been "no warming for 16 years?!?!

Seriously dude - you are the last person who should be advising anyone else about " logical arguments "

BTW - do you notice the difference between my post above and ALL of your posts?

I will give you a clue - I post EVIDENCE to support the statements that I make.

THis is where you go wrong.

You told us that glaciers are not receding. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that the MWP was 4 degrees warmer globally than today. You posted no evidence to support this statement
You told us that an undersea volcano was making the arctic ice cap melt. You posted no evidence to support this statement.

I have asked you over and over and over again to provide evidence to supporrt your statements.

But you cannot

THis is why it is obvious that you are telling lies. If you were not telling lies - you would prove me wrong. But you can't.

Don't you think it is time you apologised for lying to the forum?

Stick the homoginised data where it belongs. In the cults bin.

Heh! And you wonder why you are called a denier!

Yes I do deny the legitimate use of homoginised data. The homogenisation is not peer-reviewed.

Yes - ignorance and denial do go hand in hand. Thanks for reminding us:

Homogenization of Climate Data: Review and New Perspectives Using Geostatistics
A homogeneous climate time series is defined as one where the variations are caused only by variations in climate (Aguilar et al. 2003). Non-climatic factors may hide the true climatic signals and patterns, and thus potentially bias the conclusions of cli- mate and hydrological studies. Frequent factors are monitoring stations relocations, changes in instrumentation, changes of the surroundings, instrumental inaccuracies, and changes of observational and calculation procedures. Unfortunately, few long- term climate time series are free of irregularities (Auer et al. 2005). Consequently, it is an important task to assess the homogeneity of long climate records before they can be reliably used.

http://www.homogenisation.org/files/private/WG1/Bibliography/Comparisons_and_Rev...

Just list who uses what homogenisation method and where the peer-reviewed literature states that the type/method of homogenisation used was tested.

Back to top

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: Global cooling
Reply #252 - Jan 11^th, 2013 at 8:29am

skippy. wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 4:02pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:57am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 5:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:46pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2013 at 2:06pm:

Record temps man, Its a once in a 4000 million year event Grin

But according to confusionalists the world is only five thousand years old.

That’s true, Skippy. The alarmist evolutionists like to pretend there’s a consensus on this issue as well. Even Alan concedes the Book of Leviticus contains scientific evidence about the age of God’s creation.

These leftards will finally come around when Matty is proved right in 2013. We know one thing:

THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT MR ABBOTT LEADS.

Actually it was James Ussher who, in 1650, came up with the idea that the Earth was only 5000 years old..The Bible doesn't actually give any age..

Yet many god bothering morons believe this, it is after all preached in many churches and linked to the bible.

Quote:

How old is the earth according to the Bible?

Quick-read this article:
The Bible is clear that Adam, the first man, lived only 6000 years ago. Adam was created on the sixth day of God's Creation Week, so according to the Bible the earth must be only 6000 years old too.

HOW OLD is the earth according to the Bible? The following timeline by Theodore Pederson appeared in The Christian News, March 26, 2001, page 18.

How old is the earth?
If we go back 500 years, we come to the time of Martin Luther (born in 1483), and Columbus, who “sailed the ocean blue in 1492.”
If we go back 1000 years, we come to the time of Leif Ericson, Christian explorer, who preached Christ to pagans. (World Book, 1983, vol.6, page 270.)
If we go back 2000 years, we come to the birth of Jesus Christ. Our calendar is dated from His birth.
If we go back 3000 years, we come to the time of David and Solomon; they ruled Israel about 1000 BC.
If we go back 4000 years, we come to the time of Abraham (2000 BC), ancestor of Arabs and Jews.
If we go back 5000 years, we come to the time of Enoch, who “walked with God 300 years … and God took him [into Heaven].”
If we go back 6000 years, we come to the time of Creation, and Adam and Eve (4004 BC). Luke, evangelist and historian, records Adam as the first man (Luke 3:38).
The earth is about 6000 years old. Let God's people rejoice in Him who made them! (Psalm 149

the bible Claims Adam lived 6 thousand years ago, bible bashers claim Adam was created in the first week of the earths life, I rest my case. Roll Eyes

try again dimmest-of-the-dim. the bible doesnt say it at all. this is just another nutjopb making claims the bible doesnt make. repeateding then doesnt make it any more true. very few belieive it.

Back to top

IP Logged