rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 11:54am:


let me first applaud your very effective way of telling a fact and missing the truth by answering a question not asked.

yes the last 16 years is warmer than the preceding 30 year average. the point, dear hysteric, is that the last 16 years have shown NO temperature increase. this is indicative of a possible end to warming and the possibility of cooling. maybe. what it is NOT is increased warming.

why is it that you climate hysterics are so absolutely terrible at statistics? from the embarrassing foolishness of the debunked hockey stick all the way to today, you simply reinterpret, misinterpret or blatantly lie about the data.

NO WARMING IN 16 YEARS.  explain it all you want. call it a pause in the path of increased warming if you wish. But don't look like a ideologically driven blind person who cant count by saying that it is still getting warmer.  that's just wrong.

gold_medal wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 11:59am:

The simple fact is that EVERY SINGLE ONE of the past 16 years has had a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the global 30 year average.

This means the planet is warming.

Denying it is silly.  Trying to rely nonsense about "no warming" as written by David Rose in a Daily Mail article is even sillier.

Where is your reference for the CRU or the IPCC admiting that there has been no statistically significant warming for the past 16 years?  Please show us or apologise for lying to the forum.

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:08pm:

You need an updated graph and one you didnt make yourself. Get one from a reputable source, unless you think the MET office is not.

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:36pm:

They dont have to tell us the inconvenient. The graph tells us and shcool level math tells us that 1 = 1.

adelcrow wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:50pm:

Except you are slow as usual. The doomsday cult are the ones trying to use weather as climate. The game begins with the cult as other BS doomsday predictions have hurt your own philosophy.

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:57pm:

Yet the overwhelming majority of confusionalists have no smacking idea of the difference between climate and weather. We even have poor old cods asking every other day what the difference is, and she is one of the smart ones compered  to the rest of you.

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:02pm:


the probem with your position is that ACTUAL RECORDED TEMPERATURES are not rising. argue all you like but it is true.  AS ai said before. Argue the pause if you will - that at least is credible. Arguing that termpeatures are still rising not only makes you look like a fool, but confirms it.

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 12:36pm:


The UK MET are incapable of admitting anything other than the hysterical position. They are so bad that the UK Parliament held an enquiry into them after that had for 5 consecutive years said that the year will be record hot while the result was near record cold. After a awhile, even the parliament got sick of their idiotic predictions.

And so now, the MET  release a graph that clearly and unequivocally shows no warming for 16 years and then says no, it is actually warming.

so do you understand why we take so much so-called expert opinion with a pinch of salt?  They are either incompetent or lie. not much of a choice!