rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2013 at 8:44pm:


not just hot - HOTTER. a lot hotter. but just like the MWP you simply ignore it and say it didnt happen

adelcrow wrote on Jan 4^th, 2013 at 6:18pm:


LOL

It's summer you dam moron.

FriYAY wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 11:09am:


A single weather event cant be blamed on global warming. We've had heat waves in the past and we'll have them in the future. Global warming is about the long term trend over decades.

You can't just cherry pick your weather events, thats as bad as the current lie doing the rounds that global warming stopped 16 years ago.  It shows a complete ignorance of how global warming works.

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 11:55am:


please remember that the next time the alarmists point to some weather or hurricane or whatever and call it gobal warming.

and liek it or not - even the alarmists admit that the last 16 years has had no significant warming.

MOTR wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:


oh how convenient.. u seem to have missed all the questions asked of yousSo here is that list again that you seems to think so unlikely to have published climate papers

Claude Allegre, former director of the Institute for the Study of the Earth, University of Paris;
J. Scott Armstrong, cofounder of the Journal of Forecasting and the International Journal of Forecasting;
Jan Breslow, head of the Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism, Rockefeller University;
Roger Cohen, fellow, American Physical Society;
Edward David, member, National Academy of Engineering and National Academy of Sciences;
William Happer, professor of physics, Princeton;
Michael Kelly, professor of technology, University of Cambridge, U.K.;
William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology;
Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences, MIT;
James McGrath, professor of chemistry, Virginia Technical University;
Rodney Nichols, former president and CEO of the New York Academy of Sciences;
Burt Rutan, aerospace engineer, designer of Voyager and SpaceShipOne;
Harrison H. Schmitt, Apollo 17 astronaut and former U.S. senator;
Nir Shaviv, professor of astrophysics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem;
Henk Tennekes, former director, Royal Dutch Meteorological Service;
Antonio Zichichi, president of the World Federation of Scientists, Geneva.

now tell me again why this rather prestigious group's opinion is worthless

gold_medal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:



It makes no difference to the AGW alarmists.  If it can be used to support their "argument" they will always treat 'global warming & climate change' and 'weather & climate' as interchangeable terms.

They have very little in the way of science to support their hypothesis, so semantics and colourful graphs are their weapons of choice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 6^th, 2013 at 1:30pm:


I personally like the 'its warmer therefore AGW and its cooler therefore AGW plus my personal fav its drought therefore AGw along with its raining heavy therefore AGW'

in marketing terms the ACC hysterics are doing a wondreful job. Its like selling pet rocks. There will always be people wanting them and believing that are alive.