progressiveslol wrote on Jan 31
st, 2013 at 4:28pm:
Weather events are never climate. Weather observed over a large timeframe is climate. Unless you join a doomsday cult, then weather events (hot) are the new climate when it suites. When the weather event doesnt suit (cold), then you call it climate change induced weather event.
That's the point. Nobody is claiming that the globe will heat totally uniformly. In some cases (for example melting sea ice) whole ocean currents will change causing local cooling effects.
Nobody is claiming anything different to that. The predicted changes in climate (temperature and precipitation) are highly variable on a global scale. You need to read Chapter 11 to find out what is actually being predicted and to find out what you're supposed to be disagreeing with. The problem is that you start to look foolish when you argue against something when you don't know the detail of what you claim to disagree with.
Your claims that cold weather events are inconsistent with your highly simplified strawman of a worldwide conspiracy (that includes the BoM and CSIRO among others) are nothing short of laughable.
If you want to disagree, you'll need to do your homework to see exactly what you're supposed to disagree with, with due reference to the Gospel according to Watts.
Here. If there is something you don't understand, just ask.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch11.htmlI don't see the point of arguing with the faithful, so I'll leave it to Dr Jolly.