cods wrote on Jan 9
th, 2013 at 4:42pm:
...especially in Tasmania where the greens have systematically stopped burn backs.
THAT, is an oft perpetuated MYTH
The Greens do NOT oppose controlled back burning
Jim Reiher
Mon, 16/02/2009
We need to set the record straight on this one. The Greens accept the need for controlled back burning. Of course we do!
The Australian Greens policy states:
Quote:The Australian Greens want effective habitat management, including
ecologically appropriate use of fire.
The Greens expressly support controlled and appropriate fuel reduction burns
that have been part of Australia’s landscape and indigenous culture for tens of thousands of years.
Scientifically-based burning protects lives and property, is good for the environment
and, if adequately supported by Governments, would create thousands of jobs in park management.
The Greens urge extreme care and extensive planning to ensure that ill-advised burning does not jeopardise lives and property as has, tragically, happened on many occasions.
In their submission to the 2003 Victorian Bushfire Inquiry, the Australian Greens Victoria (North East Region), clearly and strongly called for fuel reduction burns:
An effective strategic fuel-reduction burning strategy is required based on scientific fire ecology and fire behaviour information.
It is critical that any revised approach to fuel-reduction burning is scientifically based, drawing on the expertise and further research of fire ecologists and fire behaviour scientists. The goal must be to produce a sustainable strategy for fuel-reduction management that will protect biodiversity and moderate the effects of wildfire to an acceptable level for protection of people and assets.
The Tasmanian Greens call for:
Ensuring that fuel reduction burning to protect property is carried out in the appropriate season to limit likelihood of higher intensity fires in dry periods
.[3]
The Greens are conscious that appropriate fuel reduction burning is extremely resource intensive.
Proper management of national parks and reserves requires more funding from State and Federal Governments. That is what the Greens want.
Cont ...
http://jimreiher.com/?q=node/28JIM REIHER is a member and cantidate for the Victorian Greens