when stuff like this is actually happening

my question: what the fck is causing this? this would never have happened fifty years ago

IMO; feminism could be causing this. 'nice guys' and omega male, sexless herbs have since feminism found it increasingly more and more difficult to get dates, driving them insane/up the wall. i bet this sort of thing *never* happens in middle eastern/islamic countries. this guy probably would have had a wife sixty years ago.

western society is demented. i am increasingly growing more and more weary, more and more bored with these culture warriors who laud the 'west'. our culture is broken and we need a team of dedicated sociologists and round the clock researchers to diagnose this problem. this image is emblematic of huge issues. something has fvked this kid up. i'm sure he's a nice guy, too. called 'creepy' by every woman around him he has ever been hit on. never been able to get a date, endlessly rejected, making it impossible for him to ever be able to live even semi-normally.

something is fvked. bring back arranged marriages imo for the time being, at least that might give this kid a chance at some happiness.

Still, at least he's just playing with ponies rather than shooting up schools.  Sexless herbs can go either way though - remember that face, becasue if anything happens to his pony, his might be the face of the next mass shooter. 

i don't agree tbh.. i think this guy would be a laughing stock now. nobody outside a small circle of weridos on the internet would tolerate this. this guy has been fvked up; he's sexless and lonely and women probably hate his guts. sure he'd of still been weird seventy years ago but he'd of found a girl, had been married by 18 or so, never would have had his mind twisted to the point where he's "dating" a children's toy. i bet every girl he has hit on thinks he's a 'serial killer' or something. that's what fvked him up. now we've got all these 'empowered' women who ~dont need no man~ and are all waiting out for superman, guys like this are the no 1 casuality.

JC Denton wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:16pm:


Oh poo yeah, but he doesn't need to go out and face the world when he has the internet.  he probably doesn't have any contact with anyone offline.

All th "isms" are involved.  Mulsticukltraism, feminism, cultural marxism - all are about fragmenting society, and atomising individuals.  Way back when he'd have a network of...not friends...but associates, neighbours etc that he'd have to navigate in everyday life, to keep him in check.  When all you've got is yourself and a cultivated group of online fruitcakes to enforce social norms, it's not going to turn out right.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 10^th, 2013 at 1:14pm:



A civilization thing?! Civilization existed while there were arranged marriages.

any culture that does not accept whole cloth

1) race denialism or is irrelevanitsm
2) human 'rights', suffrage, democracy
3) homo-economism and the idea that people are interchangable, economic widgets

to any liberal, is not a civilization and could never be.

There's definitely been a feminisation or emasculation project going on the past few decades. Masculinity has been thoroughly degraded by Cultural Marxists. Its great success has been to paint masculinity as nothing but raw aggression, while ignoring masculinity's other areas like the will to self-discipline and will to self-responsibility. By painting masculinity as something that leads to murder, racism, sexism, slavery, imperialism, rape etc etc (rather than showing how it lead to almost every advance made in the arts and sciences), they have tried, and have been successful in many areas, to reduce men to domesticated house pets.

I think men have to be careful, though, when they try and forge their way out of this labyrinth of self-flagellation. There is the tendency to embrace raw force and start beating the sh*t out of things (think Fight Club) as a way of re-embracing masculine principles. I would suggest that even courses be taught (whether publicly or privately funded, or done through charity) on what masculinity is and how to re-embrace it gracefully. Because, I believe that sublimation is the key masculine tool. Men have achieved so much by sublimating their aggression into their hobbies, tasks, and goals. Such a course would be one in how to control and re-take their own souls, rather than a course based purely around lambasting 'power structures.' Because, I believe the major difference between feminism and masculinity is that the former posits blame for their condition on the 'other,' whereas the latter own their condition and then take on the self-responsibility to change it.

In the long run, masculinity in society would re-emerge when the men have actually been turned back into men, rather than doing the feminist approach of legislating for change then magically expecting there to be change.