FRED. wrote on Jan 25
th, 2013 at 9:56am:
Karnal wrote on Jan 25
th, 2013 at 8:17am:
Don’t get me started on Nam. Of course it was a bloody war crime. You think we followed the Geneva Convention over there?
You trumped up, flagwaving old ladies don’t have a clue about Nam. Don’t get me started.
Nam = You mean Veitnam
Were you there
You're bloody right I've been there. And I know how to spell Vietnam, you goose.
Stop talking out of your arse. If you think bombing a nation of rice farmers back to the stone age does not constitute a war crime - and, just to be on the safe side, popping into the countries next door and bombing the sh!t out of them as well - you're a bigger dill than most the other nuts in this thread.
And that's saying something. Look at them.
Sure. The Amerikan-backed Diem invited us all in to defend South Vietnam - it was a bit embarrassing for Menzies to send in the troops before he got the letter, but who's going to complain? And tell me this - which Cambodian and Laotian leaders invited us in to blow them up?
The Yanks dropped more TNT on Cambodia than they did in the entire second world war. It was known as Nixon's secret war. How can you drop more ammo than WWII on a tiny country in South East Asia and keep it a secret?
It was only kept secret from the Amerikan voters, but they're easily conned. How many of them can spell Vietnam?
Thanks for the spelling lesson, son. Maybe your next lesson can be about what constitutes a war crime.