Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 19
th, 2013 at 12:41pm:
Why would he not be able to stand ?
Once elected he can simply walk out of the embassy and catch a plane, claiming diplomatic emunity.
Assange contesting a senate seat is a great chance for supporters of freedom to voice their opinion. He'll get an avanlanche of votes. Hes one of those people who polarises views. Many hate him, many love him.
Antony Green wrote an interesting piece detailing the technicalities of Assange's bid.
In regards to his eligibility to stand, apparently a section in the constitution may play a role:
Quote:Then there is Section 44 (i) of the Constitution that disqualifies any person who “is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power”.
I’m not sure how Mr Assange’s current status as an asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy comes into play with Section 44. If Mr Assange was elected and if Section 44 were to be a problem, then the High Court could rule after the election that Mr Assange was not eligible to be a Senator and therefore not eligible to be a candidate. In that case, the court would instruct a re-count take place in which case the second on his party ticket would almost certainly be elected in his place
Interesting. What Green is saying is that currently Ecuador is protecting him from being extradited to Sweden, and as such that may be interpreted as him being “under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power" and/or "subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power".