Australian Politics Forum

Innocent bystander Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4220 Gender:	Re: Biatch fight Reply #15 - Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:16pm MOTR wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:31pm: [ I'd post more if Abbott wasnt such a threat to my family. Are you a family of lying cheating asylum centrelink seekers?, or are you in on the great global warming rort?
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74851
Gender: male

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #16 - Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:19pm

KJT1981 wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:25pm:

Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:07pm:

Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?

Freedman, why don't you ask adel, skippy, MOTR, Alevine, both the Smiths, DNA etc if they have ever posted a comment that was anti labor.

yes , I have ... and before you ask, you look for it you useless twat. Now go and ask mummy to read you a story and off to bed with you.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #17 - Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:38pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:56pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Quote:

then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place?

To 'get on with the job' perhaps?

If that were true, and Gillard honestly believed what she said today way back when the agreement was being signed, then why make the agreement?

To 'get on with the job' perhaps?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #18 - Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:45pm

Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:07pm:

Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?

Yes
Quote:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337923454

I thought Rudd was a great tactician. You have to admire his strategy of becoming the teflon-man

The last Labor leadership challenge - those who came out in public support for Rudd took a brave stance. Albo was particularly brave

But Labor have done so many bad things - that drowns out a couple of good things they did

I just don't like Gillard or Swan or Carr or any of the ex-union bosses sitting on the ALP front bench (about 80% of them)

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 20^th, 2013 at 10:37pm by Maqqa »

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #19 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:00am

Maqqa wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:45pm:

Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:07pm:

Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?

Yes
Quote:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337923454

I thought Rudd was a great tactician. You have to admire his strategy of becoming the teflon-man

The last Labor leadership challenge - those who came out in public support for Rudd took a brave stance. Albo was particularly brave

But Labor have done so many bad things - that drowns out a couple of good things they did

I just don't like Gillard or Swan or Carr or any of the ex-union bosses sitting on the ALP front bench (about 80% of them)

You'll probably find that post was inspired by an overwhelming need to sexualise Keneally. Why do so many of Abbott's fanbois seem to lack common decency.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #20 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:23am

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:00am:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:45pm:

Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:07pm:

Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?

Yes
Quote:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337923454

I thought Rudd was a great tactician. You have to admire his strategy of becoming the teflon-man

The last Labor leadership challenge - those who came out in public support for Rudd took a brave stance. Albo was particularly brave

But Labor have done so many bad things - that drowns out a couple of good things they did

I just don't like Gillard or Swan or Carr or any of the ex-union bosses sitting on the ALP front bench (about 80% of them)

You'll probably find that post was inspired by an overwhelming need to sexualise Keneally. Why do so many of Abbott's fanbois seem to lack common decency.

Read the article - I was applauding the article

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Biatch fight Reply #21 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:46am Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:34pm: Not sure about the pants but nice set And you clearly couldn't do it without sexualising Keneally. Just like you couldn't intelligently discuss the manoeuvrings of two female politicians without demeaning their gender. Why is it that Abbott collects such a fan base.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #22 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:56am

Innocent bystander wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 6:58pm:

Gillard and Milne think they can adjust the planets temperature from their office in Canberra, both mental patients if you ask me.

Tony thinks climate change is crap.

Do you really want to vote for someone who ignores all scientific advice, yet still gives character references for pedophiles?

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #23 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:59am

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:46am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

Not sure about the pants but nice set

And you clearly couldn't do it without sexualising Keneally. Just like you couldn't intelligently discuss the manoeuvrings of two female politicians without demeaning their gender.

Why is it that Abbott collects such a fan base.

I was using the same standards Gillard used to describe the interactions between Abbott and women

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #24 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 1:56am

Maqqa wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:59am:

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:46am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

Not sure about the pants but nice set

And you clearly couldn't do it without sexualising Keneally. Just like you couldn't intelligently discuss the manoeuvrings of two female politicians without demeaning their gender.

Why is it that Abbott collects such a fan base.

I was using the same standards Gillard used to describe the interactions between Abbott and women

No, Maqqa. How about you pull your head in and show a little more respect for women.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #25 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 2:46am

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 1:56am:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:59am:

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:46am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

Not sure about the pants but nice set

And you clearly couldn't do it without sexualising Keneally. Just like you couldn't intelligently discuss the manoeuvrings of two female politicians without demeaning their gender.

Why is it that Abbott collects such a fan base.

I was using the same standards Gillard used to describe the interactions between Abbott and women

No, Maqqa. How about you pull your head in and show a little more respect for women.

What makes you think I don't have respect for women?

I just don't respect Gillard and Milne and the way they try to use sexism to further their political gains.

If they want to use it for gains then I will use it to blunt that advance

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #26 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 2:48am

MOTR wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:46am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

Not sure about the pants but nice set

And you clearly couldn't do it without sexualising Keneally. Just like you couldn't intelligently discuss the manoeuvrings of two female politicians without demeaning their gender.

Why is it that Abbott collects such a fan base.

that was in response to the other posts

the initial intention of the thread is reflected in the title and content of the article

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26512
Australia

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #27 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 4:08am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:56pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Quote:

then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place?

To 'get on with the job' perhaps?

If that were true, and Gillard honestly believed what she said today way back when the agreement was being signed, then why make the agreement? She didn't need to do that because the Greens were never going to support Abbott. Gillard made an enormous blunder in signing that agreement with Brown. She would've had the support of the Greens even if she had not signed that agreement. She has no one else to blame for this mess but herself and this is yet another example of why people should seriously question her lack of good judgement.

See this is whats wrong with you ppl (by you ppl i mean ppl that call themselves "the right"). you refuse to compromise or make any agreements with who you have declared is your enemy. No working together @ all.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26080
Gender: male

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #28 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 6:50am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 4:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 7:56pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Quote:

then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place?

To 'get on with the job' perhaps?

If that were true, and Gillard honestly believed what she said today way back when the agreement was being signed, then why make the agreement? She didn't need to do that because the Greens were never going to support Abbott. Gillard made an enormous blunder in signing that agreement with Brown. She would've had the support of the Greens even if she had not signed that agreement. She has no one else to blame for this mess but herself and this is yet another example of why people should seriously question her lack of good judgement.

See this is whats wrong with you ppl (by you ppl i mean ppl that call themselves "the right"). you refuse to compromise or make any agreements with who you have declared is your enemy. No working together @ all.

SOB

Yeah, you know that obviously isn't true and especially not in this instance.

Back to top

IP Logged

Innocent bystander

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male

Re: Biatch fight
Reply #29 - Feb 21^st, 2013 at 9:05am

rabbitoh07 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2013 at 12:56am:

Innocent bystander wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 6:58pm:

Gillard and Milne think they can adjust the planets temperature from their office in Canberra, both mental patients if you ask me.

Tony thinks climate change is crap.

Do you really want to vote for someone who ignores all scientific advice, yet still gives character references for pedophiles?

Well at least its only a reference and he's not a pedophile himself, unlike half the labor party Grin

Back to top

IP Logged