Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Biatch fight (Read 1246 times)
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Biatch fight
Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:33pm
 
http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/16190166/greens-are-protest-party-say...

Prime Minister Julia Gillard says the Australian Greens are a "party of protest" and the tearing up of their post-election deal with Labor won't impact the government.

In her first public comments after Greens leader Christine Milne signalled the end of the agreement on Tuesday, Ms Gillard said Labor had entered into deals with the Greens and independents after the deadlocked 2010 election to "get on with the job".

The prime minister said she was "unsurprised" the Greens had decided to walk away from the agreement in an election year.

"At the end of the day, the Greens party is fundamentally a party of protest rather than a party of government," she told reporters in Adelaide on Wednesday.

"The Greens party is fundamentally a party that would prefer to complain about things than get solutions."

Responding to Greens criticism of Labor for allowing mining in Tasmania's Tarkine region, Ms Gillard said the government would always stand up for the jobs of Australian workers.

Ms Gillard said Senator Milne had phoned her before the National Press Club address on Tuesday to inform her of the decision.

"I did always anticipate that they would revert to type and they've done so," Ms Gillard said.

"I said sort of `thanks, rightio' and that was it."

She noted Senator Milne had confirmed the Greens would continue to provide confidence and supply in parliament.

"There are no consequences in relation to stability," Ms Gillard said.
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #1 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:34pm
 
even if there is no fighting - they are still biatches

most hated pollies going around
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26080
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #2 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:38pm
 
This calls into question Gillards' judgement. If she believed what she has said today of the Greens, then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place? Way to talk yourself into a corner, Jules!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #3 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
Another sexist thread by an Abbott fanboi.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #4 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:50pm
 
Quote:
then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place?


To 'get on with the job' perhaps?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #5 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:51pm
 
MOTR wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:40pm:
Another sexist thread by an Abbott fanboi.



You don't like sexism then don't support the current sexist PM
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #6 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:58pm
 
Gillard and Milne think they can adjust the planets temperature from their office in Canberra, both mental patients if you ask me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #7 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:07pm
 
Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #8 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:09pm
 
Quote:
The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?


Of course he has. Many of his posts are pro liberal.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #9 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:14pm
 
Innocent bystander wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:58pm:
Gillard and Milne think they can adjust the planets temperature from their office in Canberra, both mental patients if you ask me.


Neither of them believe that. They both understand that collective action is required. They also understand that collective action doesn't happen without individuals being willing to take individual responsibility.

Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
KJT1981
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1822
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #10 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:25pm
 
Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:07pm:
Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?



Freedman, why don't you ask adel, skippy, MOTR, Alevine, both the Smiths, DNA etc if they have ever posted a comment that was anti labor.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #11 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:26pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:09pm:
Quote:
The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?


Of course he has. Many of his posts are pro liberal.


I have to disagree, as he is actually She!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #12 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:30pm
 
KJT1981 wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:25pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:07pm:
Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?



Freedman, why don't you ask adel, skippy, MOTR, Alevine, both the Smiths, DNA etc if they have ever posted a comment that was anti labor.


Why don't you ask me?

I will answer anyway!

Yes, I have posted anti Labor AND I have posted anti Liberal AND that's because they aren't worth 2 knobs of goat Sh!t, between both of them!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #13 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:31pm
 
KJT1981 wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:25pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:07pm:
Maqqa, I asked you a question on another thread, but, being a busy person, you obviously missed it.

The question was: I n all your time on this forum, have you ever posted a comment that wasn't anti Labor?



Freedman, why don't you ask adel, skippy, MOTR, Alevine, both the Smiths, DNA etc if they have ever posted a comment that was anti labor.


I know I've posted comments critical of the Labor government. I'd post more if Abbott wasnt such a threat to my family.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26080
Gender: male
Re: Biatch fight
Reply #14 - Feb 20th, 2013 at 7:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 20th, 2013 at 6:50pm:
Quote:
then why enter into an agreement with that party in the first place?


To 'get on with the job' perhaps?


If that were true, and Gillard honestly believed what she said today way back when the agreement was being signed, then why make the agreement? She didn't need to do that because the Greens were never going to support Abbott. Gillard made an enormous blunder in signing that agreement with Brown. She would've had the support of the Greens even if she had not signed that agreement. She has no one else to blame for this mess but herself and this is yet another example of why people should seriously question her lack of good judgement.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print