I am forced to practice celibacy as girls can't handle 15 inches.

Damn that was my only excuse to maintain my pride.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 12:01pm:


No, you are misreading what they are saying. No one in the catholic church says it is wrong for a priest to get married but okay to have sex. This is your misunderstanding. The Wiki page you quoted is correct, you just don't know what it actually says.

Since you love wikipedia so much;

"the Church does teach that sexual intercourse outside of marriage is contrary to its purpose."

Quantum wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 1:14pm:


Nope. You must be. If you had evidence to the contrary you would have posted it.

Quote:


SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 7^th, 2013 at 5:01am:


Are you for real? I just did give evidence! It is right above in the very post you quoted! Let me repeat it again;

Quote:


Have you had a stroke in the last week spot? Is there a reason that you are out doing your usual stupid posts with these recent super stupid ones? Look at this response of yours that you think proves that Catholics allow sex outside of marriage;

Quote:


Look at the part I highlighted. Do you even understand what you are quoting these days? Celibacy in the catholic church in regards to priests is an on top of rule. As in; on top of not having sex before marriage, don't even get married. It does not mean; don't get married, but feel free to screw anyone you wish, type rule that you're arguing for.

This thread, coupled with your recent Abbott committed treason because Howard said so topic, are both proof that either English isn't your first language, or that you have some comprehension disability. When it comes to what people say or write you either see stuff that isn't there, or you doesn't see the things right in front of you. Now having problems with English comprehension is not a crime, but stop telling others that they are wrong when you clearly don't know what you are talking about.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 7^th, 2013 at 9:14am:


It was a quote from Wikipedia. How is that anything different from what you did?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 7^th, 2013 at 10:14am:


Got you now you fvckwit!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholicism_and_sexuality

Right there! That's where the quote came from. So are you going to apologize for accusing me of making stuff up? Or can we now forever quote this debate as proof positive that you are a liar?

Amazing that you would make such a stupid accusation. Do you know how I found the quote again a day after copying it from wikipedia? I simply cut and pasted it again, this time into the google search bar. 5 seconds is all it took. That's how much research you would have had to have done before you accused me of making stuff up. You are not only a lying moron, but a bloody lazy one as well.

Quote:


I addressed them you dick. In fact I posted "evidence" as you call it showing that you were wrong. You are the one who started the quoting issue by saying I had not given any evidence and then accusing me of making evidence up.

You are a complete retard and have been caught red-handed making baseless accusations.   

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 12:01pm:


i can guarantee - as can anyone with 1/10 of a brain - that celibacy means to not have sex, period. Your understanding of the word is , as always' wrong.