Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Who would Abbott rather face.

Voted Labor think Rudd    
  0 (0.0%)
Voted Labor think Gillard    
  3 (27.3%)
Voted Coalition think Rudd    
  0 (0.0%)
Voted Coalition Think Gillard    
  5 (45.5%)
Voted Green think Rudd    
  1 (9.1%)
Voted Green think Gillard    
  1 (9.1%)
Voted Independent think Rudd    
  0 (0.0%)
Voted Independent think Gillard    
  1 (9.1%)




Total votes: 11
« Created by: MOTR on: Feb 23rd, 2013 at 5:59pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Who would Tony rather face. (Read 3152 times)
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Who would Tony rather face.
Feb 23rd, 2013 at 5:59pm
 
Based on how you voted at the last Federal election, who do you think Abbott would prefer to face at the next election. This is not about who you think will make the best PM, it's about who you think Tony would rather face.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #1 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:02pm
 
Mary Poppins.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38519
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #2 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:02pm
 
Bloody hell.  Not enough existing Threads?  Bugger off.

Angry

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #3 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:15pm
 
the easiest of easy-beats is Gillard. They could put almost ANYBODY in the chair and they would do better in the polls than Gillard. its a pointless poll. But a nice deflection from GW.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #4 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:22pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:15pm:
the easiest of easy-beats is Gillard. They could put almost ANYBODY in the chair and they would do better in the polls than Gillard. its a pointless poll. But a nice deflection from GW.


I don't struggle doing multiple things simultaneously, Longy. Wheras you struggle to breathe and think rationally.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #5 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:33pm
 
poor MOTR... isnt it the title holder  that will be doing the facing OFF????

Abbott is only the contender..he has no choice in the matter..

GILLARD IS THE PM...she is YOUR chosen one MOTR.. you handed her the title

anyone can challenge her....to a face off.


as it is... I thing he will be quite happy "facing off" gillard or rudd or shorten or crean...
bring it on..
..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #6 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:33pm
 
MOTR wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:22pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:15pm:
the easiest of easy-beats is Gillard. They could put almost ANYBODY in the chair and they would do better in the polls than Gillard. its a pointless poll. But a nice deflection from GW.


I don't struggle doing multiple things simultaneously, Longy. Wheras you struggle to breathe and think rationally.


you dont have to get toey because you got proven wrong on the 17 year pause thing. just use your undoubted intelligence but disconnect it from the orthodoxy and get your OWN opinion.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
john_g
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1549
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #7 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:34pm
 
I voted for the Coalition last election, and the answer is obvious - of course Abbott would rather face Gillard.

Longy is right, the drover's dog would beat Gillard.

Put Rudd in, and it's game on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #8 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:35pm
 
MOTR wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:22pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:15pm:
the easiest of easy-beats is Gillard. They could put almost ANYBODY in the chair and they would do better in the polls than Gillard. its a pointless poll. But a nice deflection from GW.


I don't struggle doing multiple things simultaneously, Longy. Wheras you struggle to breathe and think rationally.




dont you love em longy?... they always come back to insulting the poster....its pitiful.. it really is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #9 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:38pm
 
john_g wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:34pm:
I voted for the Coalition last election, and the answer is obvious - of course Abbott would rather face Gillard.

Longy is right, the drover's dog would beat Gillard.

Put Rudd in, and it's game on.




whats he got that would make you vote for him??? whats he said???? havent seen him say anything.. except..gillard has my full support... Grin Grin

is that another lie?


so what do you think would happen if he became PM again????????.. apart from making history that is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #10 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:39pm
 
john_g wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:34pm:
I voted for the Coalition last election, and the answer is obvious - of course Abbott would rather face Gillard.

Longy is right, the drover's dog would beat Gillard.

Put Rudd in, and it's game on.


its a fairly silly poll. abbott would always want to go against the weakest opponent and frankly the only one weaker would be Thomson! that doesnt mean that the rest of them are opponents that cause the libs any fear. Rudd MIGHT pick up a  couple percent or he might even take them lower but with the current margin, he is no threat.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
john_g
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1549
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #11 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
cods wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:38pm:
john_g wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:34pm:
I voted for the Coalition last election, and the answer is obvious - of course Abbott would rather face Gillard.

Longy is right, the drover's dog would beat Gillard.

Put Rudd in, and it's game on.




whats he got that would make you vote for him??? whats he said???? havent seen him say anything.. except..gillard has my full support... Grin Grin

is that another lie?


so what do you think would happen if he became PM again????????.. apart from making history that is.


I wouldn't vote for him, cods.

I voted for him in 2007 and he disappointed me.

I mean that more people would vote Labor if Rudd became leader again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #12 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:33pm:
MOTR wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:22pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:15pm:
the easiest of easy-beats is Gillard. They could put almost ANYBODY in the chair and they would do better in the polls than Gillard. its a pointless poll. But a nice deflection from GW.


I don't struggle doing multiple things simultaneously, Longy. Wheras you struggle to breathe and think rationally.


you dont have to get toey because you got proven wrong on the 17 year pause thing. just use your undoubted intelligence but disconnect it from the orthodoxy and get your OWN opinion.


How have I been proven wrong, Longy. We both have an interpretation of what a 17 year statistical pause means in reality. Have a look at global temperatures around 1998, the beginning of your 17 year pause. Now look at the temperatures over the last decade. Of course the planet has got warmer. When an outlier becomes the norm there has certainly been some underlying warming.

...
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #13 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
MOTR wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 5:59pm:
Based on how you voted at the last Federal election, who do you think Abbott would prefer to face at the next election. This is not about who you think will make the best PM, it's about who you think Tony would rather face.

Oops, the voted GREENS prefer to face Rudd is wrong, should be voted Greens prefer to face Gillard.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
john_g
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1549
Gender: male
Re: Who would Tony rather face.
Reply #14 - Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:42pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:39pm:
john_g wrote on Feb 23rd, 2013 at 6:34pm:
I voted for the Coalition last election, and the answer is obvious - of course Abbott would rather face Gillard.

Longy is right, the drover's dog would beat Gillard.

Put Rudd in, and it's game on.


its a fairly silly poll. abbott would always want to go against the weakest opponent and frankly the only one weaker would be Thomson! that doesnt mean that the rest of them are opponents that cause the libs any fear. Rudd MIGHT pick up a  couple percent or he might even take them lower but with the current margin, he is no threat.


Mind you, the swing in Qld in that Galaxy poll was huge.

Qld is probably the most parochial state, though, so it's not likely to mean much.

The point is moot when Labor simply can't put him back in.

How would they explain those comments from last year, from Swan, Crean, Roxon, Burke, Smith and Gillard herself? It would just be too embarrassing.

Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print