Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Conroy's sneak attack on Freedom of Press (Read 4439 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59384
Here
Gender: male
Re: Conroy's sneak attack on Freedom of Press
Reply #90 - Mar 16th, 2013 at 9:54pm
 
red baron wrote on Mar 16th, 2013 at 10:45am:
Dnarever and Peter, you are both experienced and should recognise this what it is, the thin end of the wedge.

Once you start something like this there is no going back. A huge problem with this is the grey areas and its more like a black cloud. All this sh.t being frantically rushed through in a week and short, short, short on detail

I don't trust politicians they are the slimiest dogs in the land, almost up there with lawyers.

Once they give themselves power to muzzle what they don't like there will be no end to it.

Surely, you can see the inherent dangers in this set up which is designed to muzzle criticism of Labor which is crippled.

My hope is that Malcolm Turnbull has promised to repeal the  law when the Liberals get in, and they will get in.

I believe Turnbull's word on this.


Dnarever and Peter, you are both experienced and should recognise this what it is, the thin end of the wedge.

Is it? seems a fair bit of a stretch.

Do you mean it is like electing the Liberals and getting workchoices V2 as the thin edge of the wedge?

Thin edge of the wedge - does that mean that the legislation probably does not do what the panic merchants are saying?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: Conroy's sneak attack on Freedom of Press
Reply #91 - Mar 17th, 2013 at 5:18am
 
FriYAY wrote on Mar 14th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on Mar 14th, 2013 at 6:41pm:
red baron wrote on Mar 14th, 2013 at 6:28pm:
That's right it is a statement. I am stating that if Conroy's legislation gets through, the agenda for Labor will be to become invasive in every form of media there is, including forums like this.

There will be heavy censorship for any fair minded person speaking their mind and if it is anti Labor then God help them...that is what I am stating.


Once an article is published it cannot be censored. Surely you understand that?


An article is printed.

Under the new legislation some arse decides it's inappropriate.

Makes them retact maybe?

Makes sure the paper won't print that sort of stuff again.

Censorship.

Smiley


The  "arse" will be the Australian Press Council. This will continue to be funded and operated by the industry itself.

There will, in addition, be a Public Interest Media Advocate, whose role will be to examine Press Council decisions. Given that the press will continue to be judge and jury over itself, the existence of the PIMA is not just appropriate, but essential.

There will further be a public interest test applied to media mergers and acquisitions. It is hugely ironic that an industry which claims to operate in the public interest doesn't want this applied to itself.

The standards of conduct and ethics required of journalists does not change.

That, in a nutshell is Conroy's proposal.

The hysteria of the media itself, and of some posters here, one of which, at least, has the brains to know better, is farcical.
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Conroy's sneak attack on Freedom of Press
Reply #92 - Mar 17th, 2013 at 6:38am
 
Agreed, Peter. If there are legitimate concerns, it's a shame those most worried don't seem to have the power to articulate them.

You've worked in the industry, Peter, how about you play devil's advocate for a spell. What bits of the legislation should we be most concerned about.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 17th, 2013 at 6:44am by MOTR »  

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print