Australian Politics Forum - borg F-111 claim

Quantum

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3373

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #330 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:27pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

People who don't like to talk about it don't boast about it in the first place. The ones who bring it up and then don't want to give details when asked are the obvious BS artist.

(I know comprehension is not your strong point. So to avoid any confusion, I just called you a BS artist. To remove any further confusion, BS = Bullshit, as in Lying, made up, full of crap, not real, never happened, false, dishonest, devoid of truth, etc)

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #331 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:21pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 12:52pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 10:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 10:36am:

Seriously what makes you think you know anything about anyone here?

SOB

Yet you can say this about me;

Quote:

You used to be a troll - you havent changed

Moron.

Because people DO really give away their skills by what they say..

which is why drongos like booby and gaynail never say what their qualifications are because they know (unlike SOB) that they would be expected to give accurate, fast and non-googlable inside information into these professions. and they would fail.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #332 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:23pm

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:27pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

People who don't like to talk about it don't boast about it in the first place. The ones who bring it up and then don't want to give details when asked are the obvious BS artist.

(I know comprehension is not your strong point. So to avoid any confusion, I just called you a BS artist. To remove any further confusion, BS = Bullshit, as in Lying, made up, full of crap, not real, never happened, false, dishonest, devoid of truth, etc)

and today's challenge is to see how much SOB can misunderstand and misinterpret the above.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #333 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:48pm

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:27pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

People who don't like to talk about it don't boast about it in the first place. The ones who bring it up and then don't want to give details when asked are the obvious BS artist.

(I know comprehension is not your strong point. So to avoid any confusion, I just called you a BS artist. To remove any further confusion, BS = Bullshit, as in Lying, made up, full of crap, not real, never happened, false, dishonest, devoid of truth, etc)

I didnt bring it up you troll! You trolls especial longy have been going on and on about it for almost a year!

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #334 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:21pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 12:52pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 10:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 10:36am:

Seriously what makes you think you know anything about anyone here?

SOB

Yet you can say this about me;

Quote:

You used to be a troll - you havent changed

Moron.

Because people DO really give away their skills by what they say..

which is why drongos like booby and gaynail never say what their qualifications are because they know (unlike SOB) that they would be expected to give accurate, fast and non-googlable inside information into these professions. and they would fail.

Or maybe they dont want you trolls to know anything personal about them.

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Quantum

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3373

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #335 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 4:10pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:48pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:27pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

People who don't like to talk about it don't boast about it in the first place. The ones who bring it up and then don't want to give details when asked are the obvious BS artist.

(I know comprehension is not your strong point. So to avoid any confusion, I just called you a BS artist. To remove any further confusion, BS = Bullshit, as in Lying, made up, full of crap, not real, never happened, false, dishonest, devoid of truth, etc)

I didnt bring it up you troll! You trolls especial longy have been going on and on about it for almost a year!

SOB

So longy just guessed that you had gone on a F111, and it just happened to be true? At no point did you say something along the lines of; "I have gone on a F111"?

How would any of us have questioned you on this event if you had never brought it up in the first place?

Again, you are nothing but a BS artist.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #336 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 4:38pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 12:28pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 10:20am:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 9:15am:

Chard wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 9:05am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 8:39am:

So far we know Spot flew in an F111. We know this because he told us it was grey and loud.
His wife was in the RAAF that's why he was allowed in and chucked the keys to one.

All perfectly reasonable...

Not sure how the RAAF handles such things, but the US military only grants check rides to A. Politicians (rarely and they better have a damn good reason for using up flight hours), B. Entertainment personalities for public relations purposes, or C. Military presonnel either directly involved with a specific aircraft's maintenance for test purposes or as a reward for exceptional service. In all cases it involves several hours of classroom and practical trainering on emergency procedures and safety breifs as well as a full flight physical that if you fail they probably won't even let you in the same hanger as the aircraft you might've flown in.

Yeah the RAAF is pretty much the same.

Even for military personnel the free rides were rare, F18 were easier to get a flight than an pig.

Best flight I ever had was an Iroquois Gunship (right hand seat), 4 rockets WP & HE and 4000 rounds through the mini guns. Learned that I couldn't fly for sh1t and gunships kick arse. Grin

Why should we believe you?

SOB

I believe Biggie because every little feeler question he's been asked he not only gives the correct responses to, he does so unhesitatingly. Futher, he occassionally includes information that unless you've been in the military working on, in, or around helicopters and air assault it's damn unlikely he could fake it simply because it's the sort of stuff you wouldn't know otherwise. For example, his comments on ammunition stores for an M-134 are spot on to what I've had experience with the same system because you country uses the exact same kit for that weapon we use.

Meanwhile it took sixteen pages of whining and general butthurt just to get you to tell us an Aardvark is gray.

Edit: Would people stop calling it an "F1-11"? The motherbuggering dash goes before the numbers, people.

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

There is a big difference between 'not' taking about ones service and not being able to talk about it because it never happened and any talking would immediately identify ones as having no knowledge of the subject matter.

There are certain things all service personnel don't talk about, but very few don't talk about anything.

As chard has pointed out, you can always 'tell' if someone has served by the way the speak and answer questions, you have failed miserably to do either.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #337 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 4:59pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 3:48pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:27pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 2:11pm:

Well some ppl dont talk about it

SOB

People who don't like to talk about it don't boast about it in the first place. The ones who bring it up and then don't want to give details when asked are the obvious BS artist.

(I know comprehension is not your strong point. So to avoid any confusion, I just called you a BS artist. To remove any further confusion, BS = Bullshit, as in Lying, made up, full of crap, not real, never happened, false, dishonest, devoid of truth, etc)

I didnt bring it up you troll! You trolls especial longy have been going on and on about it for almost a year!

SOB

you have said prior to this thread EXPLICITLY that you had been on an F111 and on this thread you have confirmed it plus a few other idiotic details like your wife working on them etc.

it is YOU that has repeated this. a clever person ie not you, would have backed out of the claim a year ago given you had no chance of it being true.

If Bigol had claimed to have flown in an F111 Id have very seriously doubted him given the unlikelihood of the event. and he has vastly more credibility than you do on this topic.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #338 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 5:27pm

Chard wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 1:47pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 12:51pm:

Pretty sure only the F111A's were grey, the F111C's were cammo

Paint schemes rarely mean anything as far as aircraft type goes. Grey makes more sense simply because it blends well visually against the sky, aiding the aircraft against detection by the Mk1 Eyeball. Camo schemes are generaly a hold over from before AESA radars became commonplace and using terrain features to mask yourself from airborne radar sets was still viable. These days if a sufficiently powerful AESA set gets above you then there isn't anything a paintjob can do to hide you barring the use of extraordinarily expensive RAM infused paints.

My bad on my post they were G models not A models

The G's were to replace the RF 111Cs and went to 6 SQN in their original grey paint job for Reccon and the F111C remained in the strike role at 1 sqn in cammo.

The paint jobs for the Cs was just the paint we always painted them since the 1970s nothing more interesting than that.

Here's a cool photo of one of our G models landing without wheels, it happened a few years ago

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 28^th, 2013 at 5:47pm by BigOl64 »

541439_547324415301365_1567562886_n.jpg (57 KB | 23 )

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #339 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 5:49pm

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 5:27pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 1:47pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 12:51pm:

Pretty sure only the F111A's were grey, the F111C's were cammo

Paint schemes rarely mean anything as far as aircraft type goes. Grey makes more sense simply because it blends well visually against the sky, aiding the aircraft against detection by the Mk1 Eyeball. Camo schemes are generaly a hold over from before AESA radars became commonplace and using terrain features to mask yourself from airborne radar sets was still viable. These days if a sufficiently powerful AESA set gets above you then there isn't anything a paintjob can do to hide you barring the use of extraordinarily expensive RAM infused paints.

My bad on my post they were G models not A models

The G's were to replace the RF 111Cs and went to 6 SQN in their original grey paint job for Reccon and the F111C remained in the strike role at 1 sqn in cammo.

The paint jobs for the Cs was just the paint we always painted them since the 1970s nothing more interesting than that.

Here's a cool photo of one of our G models landing without wheels, it happened a few years ago

id like to see the 'after' picture of that.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

sanofi

Full Member

Offline

ozpolitic.com

Posts: 183
Gender: female

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #340 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 6:24pm

Nice.
The Spot-bashing thread was hijacked by the "Who's got the biggest swinging willy in town" hillbillies.
You sound so tough and brave I could faint! Pigs, civvies, aircraft and position, takes the breath away
Myself, I admire people of wealth. That is, of spirit, compassion, bank balance, intelligence etc.
From what I have read from this thread, I would suggest you all (except BaronVonWort) move to another country where you will be among your own kind.

Back to top

women have been taught that, for us, the earth is flat.

IP Logged

Quantum Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3373	Re: borg F-111 claim Reply #341 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 6:55pm And the Cat drags in another one... I suppose you were on "Holiday" as well and it is just a coincidence that you got back while spot is having his arse handed to him.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: borg F-111 claim
Reply #342 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 7:23pm

Quantum wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 6:55pm:

And the Cat drags in another one...

I suppose you were on "Holiday" as well and it is just a coincidence that you got back while spot is having his arse handed to him.

my thoughts as well. and lets be honest, not even the forums usual weirdos are supporting SOB. he has done such a brilliant self-immolation job on his credibility that anyone who supports him simply HAS to be a clone/sock or fellow star trek embarrassment. no other options are available.

Personally, I go for 'sock'

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: borg F-111 claim Reply #343 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 7:33pm My 2 cents worth. I know nothing about, so will not even speculate about what spots life was like BEFORE he sustained the serious head injury.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

sanofi Full Member Offline ozpolitic.com Posts: 183 Gender:	Re: borg F-111 claim Reply #344 - Mar 28^th, 2013 at 7:35pm ... wrote on Mar 28^th, 2013 at 7:33pm: My 2 cents worth. I know nothing about, so will not even speculate about what spots life was like BEFORE he sustained the serious head injury. Robert! Good to see you again!
Back to top	women have been taught that, for us, the earth is flat. IP Logged

Poll
Question: be this an image of:
goat in a pie elephant in a pie goldfish in a pie blackbird in a pie KJT1981's budgie in a pie magpie in a pie « Created by: Sir Spot of Borg on: Mar 27^th, 2013 at 4:39am »