Australian Politics Forum - Gillard's anti-father laws

corporate_whitey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 8896
Archivist

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #15 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:06am

We need to be careful as Christians that we do not allow Atheists of the right or the left morally define institutions such as marriage which are sacred and not fitting for the profane to pass judgement on...

Quote:

Luke 20:34 NIV
Jesus replied, "The people of this age marry and are given in marriage.
Read Luke 20 | View in parallel | Compare Translations
Luke 20:35 NIV
But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage,

Marriage is not the path for everyone, the Bible never says it is and its teachings on the subject are far more balanced and sane than the fundamentalism of Atheists on the subject for which it is a matter of life and death and social success...But the institution of marriage will cease to be for the elect called by God...

Back to top

World Wide Working Class Struggle

IP Logged

corporate_whitey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 8896
Archivist

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #16 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:28am

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:58pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:49pm:

Remember Jesus never taught that there was ever any sin about being single and childless and this is not a defense overall of Julia Gillard, its just that she does not sin because she has not married and is Childless...this is atheist nonsense, the Bible teaches that it is perfectly fitting to be single and Childless...it clearly teaches this...Atheists are concerned about this issue for economic and social issues but they are not moral ones before God...

So Gillard's Jesus now??!!

What...? I am merely refuting your right wing nonsense that there is some sin in being single and childless...not for Christians there is not...only for Atheists...There is highly likely sin in a lot of other things she does but marriage is not a commandment of the Bible, it is an institution, a sacred union, but not the only path...

Back to top

World Wide Working Class Struggle

IP Logged

Infarction

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 509

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #17 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:26am

So Maqqa

I have had the displeasure of looking at the website you cited as your source before, i have seen them label centrelink a terroris organisation and claim that the government has legislated to make prejury legal.

Lets just ignore that source.

Now, have you got a link to the bill/proposed legislation that actually shows that what your initial article says is going to happen, is indeed going to happen?

Or have you been sucked in by that blog because it suits your agenda to do so?

Back to top

IP Logged

Peter Freedman Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5275 Wellington Gender:	Re: Gillard's anti-father laws Reply #18 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:42am When Maqqa stoops to using a website that portrays the Australian PM as a Nazi, you know he is reaching the bottom of the pond. But keep swimming, mate, it is in you to be even more offensive.
Back to top	God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference. IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #19 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:52am

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:26am:

So Maqqa

I have had the displeasure of looking at the website you cited as your source before, i have seen them label centrelink a terroris organisation and claim that the government has legislated to make prejury legal.

Lets just ignore that source.

Now, have you got a link to the bill/proposed legislation that actually shows that what your initial article says is going to happen, is indeed going to happen?

Or have you been sucked in by that blog because it suits your agenda to do so?

You should send an email to someone who cares. There is a link provided for you. Read it and then put in the email "I support dictators and the PM in demoralizing marriage. The PM once supported the notion that my mother was a prostitute for being married, so my father was a pimp and client. Please pass the bill"

http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/mailsend/anti-family-bill.nsf/frmSendM...

Back to top

IP Logged

Infarction Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 509	Re: Gillard's anti-father laws Reply #20 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:59am I don't need to look at that site to know they are not telling the truth, it's what they do. It's happened before, it will continue happening. Do you honestly think that such things will be decided on what a victim says alone, and not on any facts, which is what it appears the blog is claiming.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #21 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:05am

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:59am:

I don't need to look at that site to know they are not telling the truth, it's what they do. It's happened before, it will continue happening.

Do you honestly think that such things will be decided on what a victim says alone, and not on any facts, which is what it appears the blog is claiming.

Do you even know what family law has been like for years. You obviously dont and it is a bloody mess with no integrity what so ever.

The site does not claim from lack of experience. It claims it because it knows.

Back to top

IP Logged

warrigal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2569
australia
Gender: male

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #22 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:39am

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:24pm:

http://www.f4e.com.au/blog/2011/07/17/gillard-a-turn-off-for-men-even-before-she...

Julia’s man problems
Julia Gillard has got a serious problem with Australian men. So much so that she is soon about to pass the most malicious anti-male laws this country has ever seen, which will effectively presume that all separated men are Wife Abusers or Child Sexual Predators, that is an effective presumption of Guilt against separated fathers.

You forgot to mention single males without female companion ship.

Back to top

If you can create a big enough lie about someone IGNORANT people will bellieve it.

The bigger the Arshole you are on this forum, the more right you have to stay.

IP Logged

Infarction

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 509

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #23 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:16pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:05am:

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:59am:

I don't need to look at that site to know they are not telling the truth, it's what they do. It's happened before, it will continue happening.

Do you honestly think that such things will be decided on what a victim says alone, and not on any facts, which is what it appears the blog is claiming.

Do you even know what family law has been like for years. You obviously dont and it is a bloody mess with no integrity what so ever.

The site does not claim from lack of experience. It claims it because it knows.

Because it knows?

Hahahaha

it's full of bitter f*cks who didn't get what they wanted in FC and rant and rave on that site.

When they claim rubbish like, the government has legislated to make perjury legal, you know exactly what their agenda is.

In any case, because a blog says that they are going to decide cases on what will be in many instances a childs thoughts, and not facts, doesn't make that the truth.

Why any one would choose to believe that is the truth without seeing actual proof is beyond me. Seems incredibly gullible.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #24 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:19pm

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:05am:

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:59am:

I don't need to look at that site to know they are not telling the truth, it's what they do. It's happened before, it will continue happening.

Do you honestly think that such things will be decided on what a victim says alone, and not on any facts, which is what it appears the blog is claiming.

Do you even know what family law has been like for years. You obviously dont and it is a bloody mess with no integrity what so ever.

The site does not claim from lack of experience. It claims it because it knows.

Because it knows?

Hahahaha

it's full of bitter f*cks who didn't get what they wanted in FC and rant and rave on that site.

When they claim rubbish like, the government has legislated to make perjury legal, you know exactly what their agenda is.

In any case, because a blog says that they are going to decide cases on what will be in many instances a childs thoughts, and not facts, doesn't make that the truth.

Why any one would choose to believe that is the truth without seeing actual proof is beyond me. Seems incredibly gullible.

Yeh just as I expected. You have no F idea. Keep to the feminazi section loser.

Back to top

IP Logged

Infarction Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 509	Re: Gillard's anti-father laws Reply #25 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:21pm Really? You can't prove what you are trying to claim is true, so you resort to that huh? Fair enough. Come back when you can show me that the proposed legislation says what is being claimed.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #26 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:23pm

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:21pm:

Really?

You can't prove what you are trying to claim is true, so you resort to that huh?

Fair enough. Come back when you can show me that the proposed legislation says what is being claimed.

No, it is because you desecrate an already trodden part of society. There is much damage done in FC and much to rant and kill yourself over.

Get a clue, then come back and say something intelligent. Otherwise I will bring you down like the dog I think you are at this very moment.

Back to top

IP Logged

Infarction Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 509	Re: Gillard's anti-father laws Reply #27 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:25pm No, i am talking about one web site on the net that has lunatics banging on with bitter rubbish.. How exactly are you going to "bring me down"? I note you still can't prove what is being claimed. I am indeed shocked by that.
Back to top	IP Logged

corporate_whitey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 8896
Archivist

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #28 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:30pm

Christians are warned to be weary of right wing and left wing atheist populism many times in the Bible andnoit to be carried away with their controversies, nor to join them, nor to endorse them...they cause mass killings with their tongues...

Quote:

Romans 16:17 ESV

I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them.

Back to top

World Wide Working Class Struggle

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Gillard's anti-father laws
Reply #29 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:31pm

Infarction wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:25pm:

No, i am talking about one web site on the net that has lunatics banging on with bitter rubbish..

How exactly are you going to "bring me down"?

I note you still can't prove what is being claimed. I am indeed shocked by that.

It is pretty simple really. If you contrast the rule of law in normal courts, compare that with FC, you will see the great opportunity for abuse. If you sit there and watch, you will realise the abuse occurring. If you live through it, you will be lucky not wanting to kill yourself 5 times a day.

Now look at the media laws going on around us now. There are people like you arguing there is nothing wrong with the laws. There are also smart people saying it has the opportunity for abuse. You are not one of those smart ones when it comes to the FC.

As for bringing you down, I was referring to not having a worry in the world at speaking to you and about you like a dog. But that was then, maybe things will change.

Back to top

IP Logged