Using the atmosphere as an open sewer is as valid today as it was 100 years ago 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:54am:

What is the "the carbon dioxide tax that no one wants"?!?!

We have a carbon price just as promised before the last election.  The election where a majority of Australians voted for parties who had a policy of imposing a carbon price.

Even in it's current form, the "tax" as you call it is favoured by more Australans than those that oppose it:

more people support the carbon tax (46%) than oppose it (44%).
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/26/essential-carbon-tax-much-more-popular-than-...

You appear to be in the minority champ.


It is only the retarded deniers that want Australia to fall behind the rest of the world on the issue of carbon pricing.  Tony knows this too.  He will never repeal it.  He can't

Disband the Climate Commission now for not only lying to us, but also for not knowing their area of supposed or expected expertise

New paper

Abstract

The observed global-warming rate has been nonuniform, and the cause of each episode of slowing in the expected warming rate is the subject of intense debate. To explain this, nonrecurrent events have commonly been invoked for each episode separately. After reviewing evidence in both the latest global data (HadCRUT4) and the longest instrumental record, Central England Temperature, a revised picture is emerging that gives a consistent attribution for each multidecadal episode of warming and cooling in recent history, and suggests that the

anthropogenic global warming trends might have been overestimated by a factor of two in the second half of the 20th century

. A recurrent multidecadal oscillation is found to extend to the preindustrial era in the 353-y Central England Temperature and is likely an internal variability related to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), possibly caused by the thermohaline circulation variability. The perspective of a long record helps in quantifying the contribution from internal variability, especially one with a period so long that it is often confused with secular trends in shorter records. Solar contribution is found to be minimal for the second half of the 20th century and less than 10% for the first half. The underlying net anthropogenic warming rate in the industrial era is found to have been steady since 1910 at 0.07–0.08 °C/decade, with superimposed AMO-related ups and downs that included the early 20th century warming, the cooling of the 1960s and 1970s, the accelerated warming of the 1980s and 1990s, and the recent slowing of the warming rates. Quantitatively, the recurrent multidecadal internal variability, often underestimated in attribution studies, accounts for 40% of the observed recent 50-y warming trend.


http://www.pnas.org/content/110/6/2058.abstract

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:48pm:

Another irrelevant link?

Why do you keep running away?

What is this lie that you think the Climate Commission has told you?  Why can't you answer?  Why do you keep running away?

Here is the report:
http://climatecommission.gov.au/report/the-angry-summer/

Please cut and paste from it the bits you claim are "lies"
What is so hard about that for you?

Why can't you do it?

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:32pm:

What is this lie that you think the Climate Commission has told you?  Why can't you answer?  Why do you keep running away?

You started this thread.  You told us:

Disband the Climate Commission now for lying to us

Why can't you tell us what these "lies" are?

Why do you keep running away when asked?
Why can't you explain your accusation?

Here is the link again for you:
http://climatecommission.gov.au/report/the-angry-summer/
Why can't you cut and paste for us the lies you claim are in this report?

How many times do you have to be asked to explain your accusation?


We all understand you have a history of being caught telling lies on this forum.  You appear to be doing it again.  Why do you bother?  It is quite clear that you are simply not smart enough to get away with telling lies the way you do.  You get caught every time.  Why do you do it?

So come on.  Man up.  You made a statement:

Disband the Climate Commission now for lying to us

How about you actually quote for us what you think th e"lies" are.

Don't run away again.

Answer the question.

Still no explanation of what these "lies" are?!?!?

Come on Progs.  You started this thread.  You told us:

Disband the Climate Commission now for lying to us

Why can't you tell us what these "lies" are?

Just cut and paste them here for us please.

Here is the report:
http://climatecommission.gov.au/report/the-angry-summer/

Please cut and paste from it the bits you claim are "lies"

We are waiting

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:31pm:

Oh poor rabbit. You actual believe you deserve another answer dont you. Idiot.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:50pm:


Key facts
1. Extreme weather events dominated the 2012/2013 Australian summer, including record-breaking heat, severe bushfires, extreme rainfall and damaging flooding. Extreme heatwaves and catastrophic bushfire conditions during the Angry Summer were made worse by climate change.

What is incorrect about this statement?


2. All weather, including extreme weather events, is influenced by climate change. All extreme weather events are now occurring in a climate system that is warmer and moister than it was 50 years ago. This influences the nature, impact and intensity of extreme weather events.
What is incorrect about this statement?



3. Australia’s Angry Summer shows that climate change is already adversely affecting Australians. The significant impacts of extreme weather on people, property, communities and the environment highlight the serious consequences of failing to adequately address climate change.

What is incorrect about this statement?

4. It is highly likely that extreme hot weather will become even more frequent and severe in Australia and around the globe over the coming decades. The decisions we make this decade will largely determine the severity of climate change and its influence on extreme events for our grandchildren.

What is incorrect about this statement?

5. It is critical that we are aware of the influence of climate change on many types of extreme weather so that communities, emergency services and governments prepare for the risk of increasingly severe and frequent extreme weather.

What is incorrect about this statement?


How about you give us some details retard?