Australian Politics Forum - Abbott's Attempts at Makeover

FRED.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3698

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #15 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:12am

Peter Freedman wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:07am:

cods wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:44am:

BTW

I have no doubt Abbott wants abortions to be as rare as possible.

goes for me toooooooo...

so many couples out there dying for a baby...

and yet we sit back and watch babies dying before they are given a chance..

people are having more than one abortion...what does that tell us????

or does stupid women like this think it should be made as easy as buying a latte?

So cods supports baby farming. Pop 'em out, then give 'em away. Or perhaps they could be sold at auction.

still cant google you up feesh and cheep man .Jurno Bullshyte Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover Reply #16 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article. If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26513
Australia

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #17 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:19am

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:41am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:25am:

cods wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:44am:

BTW

I have no doubt Abbott wants abortions to be as rare as possible.

goes for me toooooooo...

so many couples out there dying for a baby...

and yet we sit back and watch babies dying before they are given a chance..

people are having more than one abortion...what does that tell us????

or does stupid women like this think it should be made as easy as buying a latte?

In australia babies arent aborted. Some fetuses are.

SOB

Go away troll

SOB

go away troll

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #18 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:28am

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:40am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:13am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:10am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:52am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:45am:

Unlike the new, real, new, real, real MK111 Gillard.

Grin

Don't be a dope like dummy or holy dumbness, or a moron like progressives. Don't wave away the issue of politicians trying to repaint themselves with the electorate and hide their inner beliefs by offering the old argument, "but look at her." yes, she is crap too. Very few would disagree. But that's not a reason to ignore Tony's attempts at fooling people into submission. And it's dopes like yourself, dummy, holy dumbness et. al who will guarantee this country continues to linger in obscurity.

Opinions like yours are probably the reason why the initial establishment of democracy did not include suffrage for all. At least we were saved from the idiot vote.

Awwwww, didn't like the fact the Gillard has done the same thing so you had to lash out and abuse me for pointing out the hypocrisy.

BTW, it wasn't an "opinion", it was the PM who kept telling us "this is the real Julia".
>
>
So after Rudd and Gillard we are still lingering in obscurity!!! Perhaps that would be a better thread than this then? Roll Eyes

I didn't like the fact that you would excuse Tony because of Gillard Grin

. It is very naive, and basically shows that you are not asking for anything better for Australia - just the same old crap. Well done at placing yourself in the same bag as dummy.

You have the attention span of a timing light.

I’ve constantly said that Abbott will not be good for Australia. I think dumping the mining tax is a bad idea, $100 odd million is better than nothing. I think the carbon tax should stay, drop the price a bit, forget the open market idea and use the money on renewable energy infrastructure.

But what can you do when the passion fingered Rudd/Gillard/ALP bugger everything they touch? The ALP’s worst enemy is the ALP.

FFS I even said I like the fact that the Greens, love them or hate them, at least have principles and policies and they stick by them. Something the major parties won’t do because all they care about is getting into or remaining in power.

Yes so you've attempted to give yourself credibility, yet it gets undone when you then try to argue that it doesn't matter if Tony is trying to "remake" himself because Gillard did the same thing. Next time offer some better substance.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #19 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:30am

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am:

The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article.

If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail

*sigh* dummy continues to be a dummy. Dummy, you have 100 of your own threads where you can be a dummy and have free reign

Why try to spread your dummyness to threads where people attempt for serious discussion?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #20 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:36am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:30am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am:

The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article.

If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail

*sigh* dummy continues to be a dummy. Dummy, you have 100 of your own threads where you can be a dummy and have free reign

Why try to spread your dummyness to threads where people attempt for serious discussion?

There's a difference between a PhD writing for University related business and someone writing on a forum. So your comment shows a lack of education yourself

As for my referencing - I reference more than you. Shove that up your clacker

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #21 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:38am

FRED. wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:37am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:13am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:10am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:52am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:45am:

Unlike the new, real, new, real, real MK111 Gillard.

Grin

Don't be a dope like dummy or holy dumbness, or a moron like progressives. Don't wave away the issue of politicians trying to repaint themselves with the electorate and hide their inner beliefs by offering the old argument, "but look at her." yes, she is crap too. Very few would disagree. But that's not a reason to ignore Tony's attempts at fooling people into submission. And it's dopes like yourself, dummy, holy dumbness et. al who will guarantee this country continues to linger in obscurity.

Opinions like yours are probably the reason why the initial establishment of democracy did not include suffrage for all. At least we were saved from the idiot vote.

Awwwww, didn't like the fact the Gillard has done the same thing so you had to lash out and abuse me for pointing out the hypocrisy.

BTW, it wasn't an "opinion", it was the PM who kept telling us "this is the real Julia".
>
>
So after Rudd and Gillard we are still lingering in obscurity!!! Perhaps that would be a better thread than this then? Roll Eyes

I didn't like the fact that you would excuse Tony because of Gillard Grin

. It is very naive, and basically shows that you are not asking for anything better for Australia - just the same old crap. Well done at placing yourself in the same bag as dummy. No wonder these politicians can get away with this kind of crap, when all they have to do is convince an imbecile like you. Grin

I see Tony is smacking with the leftards brains Try as they might they can't destroy him. Back to your mommas tit children Grin

Another with a lack of cognitive ability. back to fishing Fweddy, set your mind at ease. All this "thinking" is doing you too much damage.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #22 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:38am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:28am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:40am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:13am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 9:10am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:52am:

FriYAY wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:45am:

Unlike the new, real, new, real, real MK111 Gillard.

Grin

Don't be a dope like dummy or holy dumbness, or a moron like progressives. Don't wave away the issue of politicians trying to repaint themselves with the electorate and hide their inner beliefs by offering the old argument, "but look at her." yes, she is crap too. Very few would disagree. But that's not a reason to ignore Tony's attempts at fooling people into submission. And it's dopes like yourself, dummy, holy dumbness et. al who will guarantee this country continues to linger in obscurity.

Opinions like yours are probably the reason why the initial establishment of democracy did not include suffrage for all. At least we were saved from the idiot vote.

Awwwww, didn't like the fact the Gillard has done the same thing so you had to lash out and abuse me for pointing out the hypocrisy.

BTW, it wasn't an "opinion", it was the PM who kept telling us "this is the real Julia".
>
>
So after Rudd and Gillard we are still lingering in obscurity!!! Perhaps that would be a better thread than this then? Roll Eyes

I didn't like the fact that you would excuse Tony because of Gillard Grin

. It is very naive, and basically shows that you are not asking for anything better for Australia - just the same old crap. Well done at placing yourself in the same bag as dummy.

You have the attention span of a timing light.

I’ve constantly said that Abbott will not be good for Australia. I think dumping the mining tax is a bad idea, $100 odd million is better than nothing. I think the carbon tax should stay, drop the price a bit, forget the open market idea and use the money on renewable energy infrastructure.

But what can you do when the passion fingered Rudd/Gillard/ALP bugger everything they touch? The ALP’s worst enemy is the ALP.

FFS I even said I like the fact that the Greens, love them or hate them, at least have principles and policies and they stick by them. Something the major parties won’t do because all they care about is getting into or remaining in power.

Yes so you've attempted to give yourself credibility, yet it gets undone when you then try to argue that it doesn't matter if Tony is trying to "remake" himself because Gillard did the same thing. Next time offer some better substance.

I offer substance and you counter with more pissy hypocrisy. Roll Eyes

You see it comes undone when you try to argue that it doesn’t matter if Julia tried to "remake" herself because Abbott is now doing the same thing.

You see how that works?

If I were you I’d stick to the Matty wank-a-thons. Surely you’ll get to eat the biscuit next time, imbecile.

Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover Reply #23 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:38am ale is illiterate - so use small words and short sentences
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #24 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:39am

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:36am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:30am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am:

The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article.

If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail

*sigh* dummy continues to be a dummy. Dummy, you have 100 of your own threads where you can be a dummy and have free reign

Why try to spread your dummyness to threads where people attempt for serious discussion?

There's a difference between a PhD writing for University related business and someone writing on a forum. So your comment shows a lack of education yourself

As for my referencing - I reference more than you. Shove that up your clacker

Exactly why you're a dummy

Now, do us a favour, go start 100 new threads of nonsense and post in them. It's low quality humour, but humour nonetheless.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #25 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:40am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:39am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:36am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:30am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am:

The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article.

If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail

*sigh* dummy continues to be a dummy. Dummy, you have 100 of your own threads where you can be a dummy and have free reign

Why try to spread your dummyness to threads where people attempt for serious discussion?

There's a difference between a PhD writing for University related business and someone writing on a forum. So your comment shows a lack of education yourself

As for my referencing - I reference more than you. Shove that up your clacker

Exactly why you're a dummy

Now, do us a favour, go start 100 new threads of nonsense and post in them. It's low quality humour, but humour nonetheless.

you as an illiterate appreciates the opportunity to read - you are welcome moron

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #26 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:42am

Everything in that article that is supposed to be what Abbott said, is actually all debates that need to be had while the women of Australia are using abortion as a form of contraception.

The killing of potentual life is in no means the same as the stopping of potentual conception.

The debate needs to be had at all times while abortion rates are so high.

I hope Abbott never changes in this department and one day we get to have the debates from his past words.

In order to have “safe, legal and rare”, we need those debates.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #27 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:43am

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:40am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:39am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:36am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:30am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:14am:

The interesting thing about Dr Gleeson is her referencing method about Abbott in the article.

If she had used this method in her doctorate citation - she would have got a miserable fail

*sigh* dummy continues to be a dummy. Dummy, you have 100 of your own threads where you can be a dummy and have free reign

Why try to spread your dummyness to threads where people attempt for serious discussion?

There's a difference between a PhD writing for University related business and someone writing on a forum. So your comment shows a lack of education yourself

As for my referencing - I reference more than you. Shove that up your clacker

Exactly why you're a dummy

Now, do us a favour, go start 100 new threads of nonsense and post in them. It's low quality humour, but humour nonetheless.

you as an illiterate appreciates the opportunity to read - you are welcome moron

* As an illiterate you would appreciate the opportunity to read. You are welcome moron *

That would've made some sense, dummy. Now, before commenting on "referencing" perhaps you could learn to form sentences first? Grin

And to reply to your poorly constructed post, I enjoy low level humour. You know...like dad jokes...Maqqa posts...all the same sad bit of fun.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover Reply #28 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:46am illiterate ale is now trying to show he/she/it is not keep going ale the illiterate
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Attempts at Makeover
Reply #29 - Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:46am

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 10:42am:

Everything in that article that is supposed to be what Abbott said, is actually all debates that need to be had while the women of Australia are using abortion as a form of contraception.

The killing of potentual life is in no means the same as the stopping of potentual conception.

The debate needs to be had at all times while abortion rates are so high.

I hope Abbott never changes in this department and one day we get to have the debates from his past words.

Well that's the point isn't it? He has changed his stance on the debate to suit both needs. It'd be nice if he actually stuck to one issue, but the point remains, as highlighted in the opinion piece, that he has changed his stance to suit. And is now getting unstuck.

As for the ACTUAL debate on abortion, I don't think people on purpose in Australia would use abortion as a form of contraception. And in the end, women have their right to choose. And if they choose to abort, then it's for no one else to try to politicise and say otherwise.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged