Australian Politics Forum - IT'S the wall-punching episode

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #15 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:06pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:00pm:

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but what did he actually do?

Punched a wall, right? In a rather intimidating way, sure, but he punched a wall.

Who exactly is the victim? The wall, or... ?

Find your wife, make her really upset, tower over her and put your face in her face and punch the wall next to her head - then get back to us. OK?

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #16 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #17 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:09pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:53pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:58pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:28pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:25pm:

Does anyone really care what Abbott may or may not have done in 1977.
I would have thought what he does in 2013 would be more relevant.

Throwing punches at women is a bad look for a bloke who already has a reputation as being sexist.

Who did that?

Tony Abbot.

There were 3 witnesses to the event.
1 who saw him throw the punch
1 who saw the victim moments afterward.
And, of course - the victim.

3 witnesses against the word of one bloke who has a history that includes a charge of indecent assault.

Same with you. The court threw it out because there was no crime committed. No evidence to suggest otherwise.

As for the 3rd person who says he did not see a crime committed but she says there was, is just heresay and pathetic evidence.

Lefty be desperate.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 96689

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #18 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:16pm

You’re just as bad. Abbott did it, as everybody knows.

Abbott was a rugby-playing extremist conservative dope at Sydney Uni - a complete and utter mysogenist. I’d never vote for him.

But it was the 1970s. We’ve all moved on. The world has moved on.

Let’s hope so, anyway. Abbott’s the next PM. Sadly, we have no choice in this.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #19 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:21pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:09pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:53pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:58pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:28pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:25pm:

Does anyone really care what Abbott may or may not have done in 1977.
I would have thought what he does in 2013 would be more relevant.

Throwing punches at women is a bad look for a bloke who already has a reputation as being sexist.

Who did that?

Tony Abbot.

There were 3 witnesses to the event.
1 who saw him throw the punch
1 who saw the victim moments afterward.
And, of course - the victim.

3 witnesses against the word of one bloke who has a history that includes a charge of indecent assault.

Same with you. The court threw it out because there was no crime committed. No evidence to suggest otherwise.

As for the 3rd person who says he did not see a crime committed but she says there was, is just heresay and pathetic evidence.

Lefty be desperate.

WTF?!?!?

What court "threw it out"?!?!?

You can't help telling lies can you!?!?

It never went to court you idiot.

You are confusing it with Abbott's indecent assault case. A completely different incident
Poor old Tony could not keep his hands to himself in those days, could he!

But - there were 3 witnesses to him throwing a punch towards a woman's head.

1 witness saw the immediat effect of the assault.
I witness saw the assault occur - an eye witness.
And the 3rd witness - Ms Ramjan - was the victim.

3 witnesses against the word of one bloke who has a history that includes a charge of indecent assault.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #20 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #21 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:24pm Aussie wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:21pm: This business of starting new Threads where there is an existing one on exactly the same topic, really sh1ts me off. Why do you do it? Why single me out? ?????
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #22 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #23 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:13pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

what court? Certainly not a court of law ... are you confusing it with a tennis court?

as far as Gillard, she's had the same music to face for over 17yr and no one has been able to show nay evidence ... when will you stop? another 17yrs? 70yrs?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #24 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 59374 Here Gender:	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #25 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:26pm The Libs support this guy?????
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh07 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2783 Gender:	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #26 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:30pm Dnarever wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:26pm: The Libs support this guy????? It is not their fault. If they don't - he may punch them.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #27 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:36pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

No crime committed. Sure. If a crime were committed, there would have been something done about it. Otherwise it could be a bunch of lefties hating on a righty. Who knows. I am certainly not going to bother with students fighting each other in an activist environment. Knock yourselves out kiddies, but if you get hurt, be sure to go to the police or ill call BS.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #28 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:52pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:36pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

No crime committed. Sure. If a crime were committed, there would have been something done about it. Otherwise it could be a bunch of lefties hating on a righty. Who knows. I am certainly not going to bother with students fighting each other in an activist environment. Knock yourselves out kiddies, but if you get hurt, be sure to go to the police or ill call BS.

Since when is assault not a crime? moron

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #29 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:03pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:52pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:36pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

No crime committed. Sure. If a crime were committed, there would have been something done about it. Otherwise it could be a bunch of lefties hating on a righty. Who knows. I am certainly not going to bother with students fighting each other in an activist environment. Knock yourselves out kiddies, but if you get hurt, be sure to go to the police or ill call BS.

Since when is assault not a crime? moron

Since when is no assault, an assult you moron

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: IT'S the wall-punching episode
lol 1 (50.0%) rofl 1 (50.0%) Total votes: 2 « Created by: BatteriesNotIncluded on: Mar 21^st, 2013 at 4:40pm »