Australian Politics Forum - IT'S the wall-punching episode

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #30 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:06pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:52pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:36pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

No crime committed. Sure. If a crime were committed, there would have been something done about it. Otherwise it could be a bunch of lefties hating on a righty. Who knows. I am certainly not going to bother with students fighting each other in an activist environment. Knock yourselves out kiddies, but if you get hurt, be sure to go to the police or ill call BS.

Since when is assault not a crime? moron

Since when is no assault, an assult you moron

punching the wall to scare or intimidate someone is assault ... I dare you to try and argue that it isn't and prove to everyone what a real moron you are.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #31 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:06pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:52pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:36pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:31pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:23pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:32pm:

Mentality of a liberal monkey

Abbott is accused of punching a wall .. with three independent witnesses ... libs response, it's all lies, you cannot prove it, he wasn't charges

Gillard is accused of stealing union funds .... we are told by someone who knew someone who had a dog that heard someone say something ... no real proof despite months of waiting for Pickering or Smith to provide some ... libs response .. guilty, no need for a trial, hang her, jail her ...

Difference. Court threw it out. No crime was committed. Get it. They had their activist go and the courts said there was no crime committed.

Gillard. Well she has music to face.

No court threw it out idiot.

A court did dismiss his indecent assault charge.

THis is an entirely separate crime we are talking about.

An assault that had 3 witnesses.

So no crime at all was committed then, not even one where a court had to throw it out.

Gee I wish I was a little closer than what you just told me. lol Now it is looking even more pathetic for you.

You have no problems voting for a bloke that assaults women? Good for you.

THere are 3 witnesses to a bloke who wants to be PM committing assault.

And the bloke who was witnessed committing the assault denies it ever happened.

We know he is a sexist. And it appears he has also assaulted women in the past.
Is he a good bloke to be a PM?

No crime committed. Sure. If a crime were committed, there would have been something done about it. Otherwise it could be a bunch of lefties hating on a righty. Who knows. I am certainly not going to bother with students fighting each other in an activist environment. Knock yourselves out kiddies, but if you get hurt, be sure to go to the police or ill call BS.

Since when is assault not a crime? moron

Since when is no assault, an assult you moron

punching the wall to scare or intimidate someone is assault ... I dare you to try and argue that it isn't and prove to everyone what a real moron you are.

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #32 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:42pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm:

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

There were (at least) 3 witnesses to the assault.

1 did not see the punch, but saw the immediate impact of it
1 saw the punch being thrown
1 was the victim herself

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has admitted he cannot be trusted:

"I know politicians are going to be judged on everything they say but sometimes in the heat of discussion you go a little bit further than you would if it was an absolutely calm, considered, prepared, scripted remark," he said.

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has also been charged with indecent assault.

You really are very trusting, aren't you.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #33 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:46pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:42pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm:

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

There were (at least) 3 witnesses to the assault.

1 did not see the punch, but saw the immediate impact of it
1 saw the punch being thrown
1 was the victim herself

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has admitted he cannot be trusted:

"I know politicians are going to be judged on everything they say but sometimes in the heat of discussion you go a little bit further than you would if it was an absolutely calm, considered, prepared, scripted remark," he said.

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has also been charged with indecent assault.

You really are very trusting, aren't you.

Yeh still not proven. There could be any number of things that went on and they were certainly not the only people in the room.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #34 - Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:59pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:46pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:42pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm:

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

There were (at least) 3 witnesses to the assault.

1 did not see the punch, but saw the immediate impact of it
1 saw the punch being thrown
1 was the victim herself

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has admitted he cannot be trusted:

"I know politicians are going to be judged on everything they say but sometimes in the heat of discussion you go a little bit further than you would if it was an absolutely calm, considered, prepared, scripted remark," he said.

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has also been charged with indecent assault.

You really are very trusting, aren't you.

Yeh still not proven. There could be any number of things that went on and they were certainly not the only people in the room.

Are you saying Ms Ramjan is a liar?

Are you saying she has lied about the assault?

Shall I contact her solicitors for you?

Would you like to be part of the action she is taking against Michael Kroger?

Even your hero Alan Jones does not agree with you:

Even shock-jock Alan Jones decided it was time to cover his butt on this one, making this on-air apology:

“Ramjan is a person of high distinction having been awarded a D. Phil from Sydney Uni and she is married to a Supreme Court judge. Ramjan has spent years avoiding the limelight and glare of politics, choosing not to get involved after her student activity ceased. I was not aware of this and I accept now that the claim she was a serial liar is not factual.”
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2012/politics/the-animal-in-tony-abbott/

Are you saying both Ms Ramjan AND Alan Jones are liars?!?!?

Are you seriously telling us you think the 3 witnesses to this assault are all liars?
And Tony Abbott is telling the truth?!?!?

Seriously?!?!?!?!

Back to top

IP Logged

Grey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5341 Gender:	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #35 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:00am chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:25pm: Does anyone really care what Abbott may or may not have done in 1977. I would have thought what he does in 2013 would be more relevant. No that doesn't matter either. it's what he's likely to do in 2014 and beyond that's a worry.
Back to top	"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #36 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:46pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:42pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm:

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

There were (at least) 3 witnesses to the assault.

1 did not see the punch, but saw the immediate impact of it
1 saw the punch being thrown
1 was the victim herself

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has admitted he cannot be trusted:

"I know politicians are going to be judged on everything they say but sometimes in the heat of discussion you go a little bit further than you would if it was an absolutely calm, considered, prepared, scripted remark," he said.

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has also been charged with indecent assault.

You really are very trusting, aren't you.

Yeh still not proven. There could be any number of things that went on and they were certainly not the only people in the room.

Are you saying Ms Ramjan is a liar?

Are you saying she has lied about the assault?

Shall I contact her solicitors for you?

Would you like to be part of the action she is taking against Michael Kroger?

Even your hero Alan Jones does not agree with you:

Even shock-jock Alan Jones decided it was time to cover his butt on this one, making this on-air apology:

“Ramjan is a person of high distinction having been awarded a D. Phil from Sydney Uni and she is married to a Supreme Court judge. Ramjan has spent years avoiding the limelight and glare of politics, choosing not to get involved after her student activity ceased. I was not aware of this and I accept now that the claim she was a serial liar is not factual.”
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2012/politics/the-animal-in-tony-abbott/

Are you saying both Ms Ramjan AND Alan Jones are liars?!?!?

Are you seriously telling us you think the 3 witnesses to this assault are all liars?
And Tony Abbott is telling the truth?!?!?

Seriously?!?!?!?!

Seriously. It wouldnt be the first time in history for someone to lie to manipulate their standing in life, be it Abbott or these people.

I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2783 Gender:	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #37 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:07am progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am: I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they. You are saying that Ms Ramjan is a liar. Is that what you are saying?
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #38 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:13am

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am:

I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they.

You are saying that Ms Ramjan is a liar.

Is that what you are saying?

You dont read so well or comprehend do you. It is not up to anyone to believe anyone. It is up to someone to prove something.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #39 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 10:26am

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:13am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am:

I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they.

You are saying that Ms Ramjan is a liar.

Is that what you are saying?

You dont read so well or comprehend do you. It is not up to anyone to believe anyone. It is up to someone to prove something.

And you have no comprehension skills at all .... for the story to be false you need to prove that all 3 witnesses are lying ... can you do that?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #40 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:18pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 10:26am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:13am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am:

I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they.

You are saying that Ms Ramjan is a liar.

Is that what you are saying?

You dont read so well or comprehend do you. It is not up to anyone to believe anyone. It is up to someone to prove something.

And you have no comprehension skills at all .... for the story to be false you need to prove that all 3 witnesses are lying ... can you do that?

Hey, even if you are starting to believe our justice system works that way (truly stupid), you were the one that said that you dont have to prove anything to me. So likewise.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59372
Here
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #41 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:21pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:42pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:25pm:

Nothing of the sort has been proven to any degree.

There were (at least) 3 witnesses to the assault.

1 did not see the punch, but saw the immediate impact of it
1 saw the punch being thrown
1 was the victim herself

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has admitted he cannot be trusted:

"I know politicians are going to be judged on everything they say but sometimes in the heat of discussion you go a little bit further than you would if it was an absolutely calm, considered, prepared, scripted remark," he said.

3 witnesses to assault. Against the word of a man who has also been charged with indecent assault.

You really are very trusting, aren't you.

No they aren't they all know he did it but are just as dishonest as he is.

They are all relying on implausible deniability.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #42 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 1:56pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 10:26am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:13am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03am:

I am saying it is not proven and could be explained in many different ways. It has to be proven. They were not the only people in the room were they.

You are saying that Ms Ramjan is a liar.

Is that what you are saying?

You dont read so well or comprehend do you. It is not up to anyone to believe anyone. It is up to someone to prove something.

And you have no comprehension skills at all .... for the story to be false you need to prove that all 3 witnesses are lying ... can you do that?

Hey, even if you are starting to believe our justice system works that way (truly stupid), you were the one that said that you dont have to prove anything to me. So likewise.

of course the justice system works that way ..

three independant witnesses stories all match up and you had better prove they are lying or your are going to jail ... how do you think it works? You think they simply refer to Pickering?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

FriYAY Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7395	Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode Reply #43 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 2:07pm Saw a mate drop this gin once. She was asking everyone for money/smokes etc (the usual) He told her to bugger off. She was blind drunk and came at him ranting and raving, swinging her arms about. POP, right on the beak. THAT was a beautiful assault.
Back to top	IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: IT'S the wall-punching episode
Reply #44 - Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 2:11pm

FriYAY wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 2:07pm:

Saw a mate drop this gin once. She was asking everyone for money/smokes etc (the usual)

He told her to bugger off.

She was blind drunk and came at him ranting and raving, swinging her arms about.

POP, right on the beak.

THAT was a beautiful assault.

Grin

I can see why love Tony Abbott so much.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: IT'S the wall-punching episode
lol 1 (50.0%) rofl 1 (50.0%) Total votes: 2 « Created by: BatteriesNotIncluded on: Mar 21^st, 2013 at 4:40pm »