Maqqa wrote on Mar 23
rd, 2013 at 5:26pm:
... wrote on Mar 23
rd, 2013 at 5:24pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 23
rd, 2013 at 1:39pm:
... wrote on Mar 23
rd, 2013 at 10:40am:
Even if this worst case scenario was true, you should be thankful you're getting it at all. It's nice to get something I can actually use for my tax dollars instead of just more ivory back scarcthers and new cars for pollies.
only a lefty would see any good in a cost blowout and time delays
If you lot are so happy with your existing internet, you'll obviously be sticking with it so what's it matter if it's running behind some arbitrary schedule? It's getting built as we speak - sitting there yapping isn't gonna get it finished any faster.
What does it matter?
(1) Under the LIBs' proposal we would have got faster broadband by now
(2) The original $4.7B that Labor costed is blowing out to $78B
(3) By the time we get this - it will would 2023
1. ha! Yeah right...These things don't build themselves you know. Anyways, even if you believe libera;ls false promises, labor is in government so it's irrelevant. Besides, you don't want or need faster internet, remember?
Contracts were already signed and work started
2. yeah, it's shithouse accounting but what do you expect from pollies? Still, the differences in price don't negate the quality or necessity of delivering the service.
So if it's Labor's numbers then you blame it on "pollies" in general
3. Yep, well labor shouldn't have made such grand gestures, but it's the same deal as point 2. Pollies always overpromise and under deliver - does it still surprise you?
So if it's Labor then it's "the pollies"
But why does it matter to you anyway? you don't want or need faster internet.
$78B which does not get you a degree any faster