A high proption of asylum seekers arrive via Malaysia or Indonesia. How they get there I don't know, but if they come from Sri Lanka or Iran it is doubtful if they travel overland.

They don't go to China because it is a dictatorship, or to Japan because it is overcrowded already, though its population is dwindling.

Australia places asylum seekers in concentration camps, sometimes for years, leaving many with mental illnesses and suicidal.

If that is soft c-k treatment then, red, you and I have a different understanding of the term.

The Real Benefits For Asylum Seekers In Australia
David Koch
Jul 14|07:09

My blog last week about the politicisation of Asylum seekers and refugees prompted quite a bit of reaction and I promised a number of readers that I’d do some research on the actual financial assistance they receive.

There are so many misleading rumours and “facts” around at the moment regarding asylum seekers and the benefits they get from the government.

One hoax email in particular is doing the rounds telling people that “illegal immigrants/refugees” receive thousands more in welfare payments than Australian pensioners.

Emails like this are completely fabricated and made up purely to conjure up negative sentiment towards asylum seekers.


If you’ve received an email which looks like this you should delete it, tell whoever sent it to you that they’re an idiot, and learn the facts…

First of all, refugees are not illegal immigrants. It has never been illegal in Australia to arrive on shore without a visa seeking asylum. In fact it’s one of the rights within the UN’s declarations on refugees which Australia helped to write.

When an asylum seeker arrives in Australia, they do not get any Centrelink benefits. While their status is being processed, and if they meet certain criteria, they can be eligible for financial support from the Asylum Seeker Assistance Scheme, administered through the Red Cross. This amount is 89% of the basic Centrelink allowance. This means approximately $405.84 per fortnight – over $260 less than a pensioner.
Once an asylum seeker is recognised as a genuine refugee, after a long and highly scrutinized process, they are given permanent residency and are then entitled to the same Centrelink, schooling and health benefits as anyone else. No more, no less.
The normal Centrelink welfare payment is $456 per fortnight, for a refugee with permanent residency and an Australian-born person. A pensioner in Australia receives $671.90. Over $200 more each fortnight. Even with family/parenting benefits, a refugee’s benefits would still be less than a pensioner’s income.
For an asylum seeker to qualify for any payment under the Asylum Seeker Assistance Scheme, they must have lodged an application for a visa 6 months before, not be in detention, and not get any other payment or benefit.
To get a permanent residence as a refugee, the person has to prove they are a genuine refugee fleeing persecution, go through character, security and medical tests, and sign an Australian Values Statement.
‘Boat people’ are asylum seekers. Refugees are asylum seekers who have been approved and given a visa. None of them are ‘illegal immigrants’.
The above facts come from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship, the Refugee Council of Australia, and from the Red Cross. A lot more reliable than a random email from a friend of a friend.

Before you make a judgment on asylum seeker policy, know the facts.

For more info, have a read of these:

- Myths about refugees and asylum seekers: the answers

- Response to lies and hoax emails – Refugee Council of Australi a

- Media Blunders on asylum seeker claims

- Assistance for Asylum seekers in Australia - DIAC

- Related articles: Avoid the POlitical Spin - Some Facts About Asylum Seekers

http://www.kochie.com.au/the-real-benefits-for-asylum-seekers-in-australia

skippy. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:51pm:


The Coalition are competent, Labor is not.
Makes all the difference in the  world skip.
Deep down you know this already.

skippy. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 7:44pm:


Yes he is skip.
He's a politician after all, and being full of it comes natural.
But despite his handicap, he will stop the boats as sure as the sun rises.
After all, the Coalition is competent, Labor is not.

Peter Freedman wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:56pm:


What, no going up the chimney?
I think you are clueless as to what constitutes a concentration camp eh.

Big Dave wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Australia's Gun-Ho policy has been more successful than 'put another shrimp on the barbie.'  Iranians have Iraq on one side & afghanistan on the other.  You're famous.  Pakistan has afghanistan next door.  Again, you're famous.  Sri-lankans have Australia interfering as U.N. observers.  Face it, you are now world-famous.  And with fame comes the baggage of assylum seekers. 

And like humpty-dumpty you cannot put things back the way they were.  And the tide is going to keep on rising and rising.

Big Dave wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 4:33am:


Then why do we get such a low percentage of the worlds asylum seekers?

SOB

skippy. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 7:44pm:


If the policies were identical, as you claim they are, Gillard would have reinstated TPV's. As she hasn't done so, you're wrong yet again!