Australian Politics Forum - Why no policy details?

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Why no policy details?

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2

Why no policy details? (Read 721 times)

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why no policy details?
Reply #15 - Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:16pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:11pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:29am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:16am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 9:42am:

adelcrow wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 8:48am:

Is Abbott not releasing any policy details simply because he's afraid Gillard will steal them like she stole his excellent idea for a simple tax on carbon?

She took that hook line and sinker when it wasnt even policy.
Next time realise Abbott is only fishing when it isnt a policy statement.

He may get gillard again. Learn.

Yep she put a tax at the bowser and a tax in your electricity bill etc - no wait a minute - she didn't did she???? In fact you actually don't pay any carbon tax at all - do you - none zero nothing???

About as far away from the Abbott real carbon tax as you could get.

i dont pay any GST either. i NEVER remit GST to the ATO for my personal purchases.

but you do pay .. it says so on your receipt .. only an idiot would say they don't pay GST ... nothing at all like the carbon 'tax'

you mean like the 9.4% increase in power bills for the carbon tax but which gillard specifically passed legislation to NOT detail it like we do with the GST?

and you DONT pay GST. the retailer/business pays the GST. you are actually under no obligationn whatsoever to pay GST yourself and in fact, cannot do so. the business pays the GST on money collected in part from you a bit like how AGL pays carbon tax from money it has collected from you.

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Why no policy details?
Reply #16 - Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:21pm

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:57am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:52am:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:47am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 8:53am:

What for?

He's got 58/42 lead

His promises so far add up to a massive fiscal deficit, even after he raids the super funds of the poorest workers.

58% says it's still better than Labor's policies

It's a bit like voting on a beauty contest while one of the contestants still has a paper bag over his head. Take the paper bag off and things are going to get ugly, real quick.

when your opponent is the elephant man (or woman) then you still win even with the paper bag over your head. I dont think you realize just how despised Gillard is out there in voter land.

Until Labor's most recent spat Gillard has consistently out polled Abbott as preferred PM.

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why no policy details?
Reply #17 - Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:26pm

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:57am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:52am:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:47am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 8:53am:

What for?

He's got 58/42 lead

His promises so far add up to a massive fiscal deficit, even after he raids the super funds of the poorest workers.

58% says it's still better than Labor's policies

It's a bit like voting on a beauty contest while one of the contestants still has a paper bag over his head. Take the paper bag off and things are going to get ugly, real quick.

when your opponent is the elephant man (or woman) then you still win even with the paper bag over your head. I dont think you realize just how despised Gillard is out there in voter land.

Until Labor's most recent spat Gillard has consistently out polled Abbott as preferred PM.

he has been in front of her several times in the past so that explanation doesnt work. PLUS the PPM figure has long been derided as the most pointless measure since it frequently trends in the opposite direction to voting intentions.

give it up. Gillard is the bubonic plague of politicians.

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Why no policy details?
Reply #18 - Mar 29^th, 2013 at 3:58pm

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:26pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:57am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:52am:

MOTR wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 11:47am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 29^th, 2013 at 8:53am:

What for?

He's got 58/42 lead

His promises so far add up to a massive fiscal deficit, even after he raids the super funds of the poorest workers.

58% says it's still better than Labor's policies

It's a bit like voting on a beauty contest while one of the contestants still has a paper bag over his head. Take the paper bag off and things are going to get ugly, real quick.

when your opponent is the elephant man (or woman) then you still win even with the paper bag over your head. I dont think you realize just how despised Gillard is out there in voter land.

Until Labor's most recent spat Gillard has consistently out polled Abbott as preferred PM.

She was also PPM at the last election and it was a hung parliament

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page