Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Independent MPs win for their electorates (Read 1852 times)
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Independent MPs win for their electorates
Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:22pm
 
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/money/money-matters/independent-federal-mps-win-15-billion-for-their-electorates/story-fn300aev-1226611161247

$1.5B in fact.

BALANCE-of-power politicians are crowing they have won $1.5 billion extra for their electorates by propping up the Gillard Government - and now they want more.

Andrew Wilkie, the independent MP for Denison, claims to have secured $900m in bonus funding for Tasmania since the last election.

And Tony Windsor is claiming credit for $300m worth of extra spending - including $120m to redevelop Tamworth Hospital and $32m for a cancer clinic - in his northern NSW electorate of New England.

In the neighboring seat of Lyne, Rob Oakeshott's constituents have enjoyed $360m in federal grants for projects ranging from $137m in hospital expansions to $102m in local highway upgrades.

Mr Oakeshott said his Port Macquarie electorate had secured more federal government funding during his five years as MP, than in 60 years with a National Party member.
-------------
'Twould appear that these MPs have done well by their constituents, despite all the crap and bile directed at them. (Mostly by people who live outside their electorates.)

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38860
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #1 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:25pm
 
Well done them.  No point having the whip hand and not using it. 

Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #2 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:31pm
 
Can anyone put this into some sort of perspective. Is there some sort of table that shows us Federal Government expenditure per capita in each electorate.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
hawil
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1345
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #3 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:40pm
 
Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:25pm:
Well done them.  No point having the whip hand and not using it. 

Smiley

This is the downfall of Democracy, because the government buys votes in some electorates at the expense of others.
I had great respect for Wilke , but that is now gone, because now he proved that he is all for himself.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #4 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:44pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:31pm:
Can anyone put this into some sort of perspective. Is there some sort of table that shows us Federal Government expenditure per capita in each electorate.


I had it somewhere, but lost it.
If I remember correctly, they did marginally better than other electorates.

Still, that was exactly what they set out to do....

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #5 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:48pm
 
The cross-benchers at the time of the 2010/11 health funding announcements - Bob Katter, Tony Windsor, Rob Oakeshott, Andrew Wilkie, Greens MP Adam Brandt and WA-based Tony Crook - held 2.1 per cent of all federal electorates.

Yet they were given 3.9 per cent of funding under the Health and Hospitals Fund - excluding the major hospital upgrades announced soon after the 2010 election.
------------
Don't know if that helps, MOTR.
Smiley
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #6 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:00pm
 
Lobo wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:48pm:
The cross-benchers at the time of the 2010/11 health funding announcements - Bob Katter, Tony Windsor, Rob Oakeshott, Andrew Wilkie, Greens MP Adam Brandt and WA-based Tony Crook - held 2.1 per cent of all federal electorates.

Yet they were given 3.9 per cent of funding under the Health and Hospitals Fund - excluding the major hospital upgrades announced soon after the 2010 election.
------------
Don't know if that helps, MOTR.
Smiley


Thanks, froggie.

From an individual electorate's position seems like a strong argument for voting in an independent, although the risk of increased logrolling and porkbarrelling has to be a real concern.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:07pm by MOTR »  

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #7 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:13pm
 
when you gotem pver a barrell you cant lose
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #8 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:17pm
 
woof woof wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:13pm:
when you gotem pver a barrell you cant lose


Unless of course your independents vote isn't needed to pass legislation.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59355
Here
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #9 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:37pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:00pm:
Lobo wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 6:48pm:
The cross-benchers at the time of the 2010/11 health funding announcements - Bob Katter, Tony Windsor, Rob Oakeshott, Andrew Wilkie, Greens MP Adam Brandt and WA-based Tony Crook - held 2.1 per cent of all federal electorates.

Yet they were given 3.9 per cent of funding under the Health and Hospitals Fund - excluding the major hospital upgrades announced soon after the 2010 election.
------------
Don't know if that helps, MOTR.
Smiley


Thanks, froggie.

From an individual electorate's position seems like a strong argument for voting in an independent, although the risk of increased logrolling and porkbarrelling has to be a real concern.


Do you think there has been an increase - iot actually looks down compared the the Howard years, maybe more of a re distribution.

Considering these are the types of areas that typically miss out it is good to see a catch up for them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #10 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:45pm
 
I was thinking along the lines of more independents. There was certainly plenty of pork-barrelling during Howard's time. Julia isn't averse to it either.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #11 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 8:51pm
 
Its one thing to mention how much money was spent, but one thing with Labor is how much of it reached front line services. going off most of their big spending projects little of the money went to those who did the work, paynebts to front line contracters was always late and value for money... hang on, does labor understand what value for money is?
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #12 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm
 
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #13 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:16pm
 
I wonder if there are any proof of these "wins"

These guys are going into an election and they are blamed as an accessory to the carbon tax

What have they got left after being screwed over by Gillard other than exaggerate their benefits
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #14 - Apr 3rd, 2013 at 10:08pm
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:17pm:
woof woof wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 7:13pm:
when you gotem pver a barrell you cant lose


Unless of course your independents vote isn't needed to pass legislation.



or if your vote is needed to keep em in power
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print