Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Independent MPs win for their electorates (Read 1864 times)
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #15 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26415
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #16 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 5:51am
 
Maqqa wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:16pm:
I wonder if there are any proof of these "wins"

These guys are going into an election and they are blamed as an accessory to the carbon tax

What have they got left after being screwed over by Gillard other than exaggerate their benefits


Oakeshott is distributing material claiming credit for the Kempsey bypass... despite it not even being in his electorate!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #17 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 6:37am
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.

You play the numbers, ill play the numbers.

Whichever numbers you play, it still points to a labor debt and taxes party being involved in creating the debt.

So I will stick to never ever seeing or knowing of a debt in Austrlia's of over $100 billion dollars. That is a record. That has significance to me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maqqa
Gold Member
*****
Offline


14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #18 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 11:22am
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.



debt's $300,000,000,000
Back to top
 

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number
 
IP Logged
 
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #19 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 11:51am
 
Is it true they have raised thedebt ceiling to 300Billion, I thought I heard that on the radio the other day??

You know why they raised it?? cause they need it, if the budget was insurplus you wouldn't need  bigger credit card.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #20 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 2:51pm
 
Maqqa wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:16pm:
I wonder if there are any proof of these "wins"


Straight out of the Murdoch Press, macca, so it MUST be true.

How dare you question the Murdoch Press???
Shame on you!!

Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #21 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 2:54pm
 
Way to go supporting pork-barrelling.

bugger democracy eh?
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #22 - Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:35pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 2:54pm:
Way to go supporting pork-barrelling.
bugger democracy eh?


Edward Everett Hale used the term pork barrel as a homely metaphor for any form of public spending to the citizenry.

People like yourself turned it into a derogatory term.

Smiley

BTW...What will you call it if/when Abbott gets around to it??
Cheesy
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #23 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:30am
 
MOTR wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.


I dont know if you fully understand the meaning of 'record'. the current level of net govt debt (in real terms) is the highest in history ergo RECORD. the current deficit is the highest in history in real terms and is also RECORD. no other determination is possible.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #24 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:44am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:30am:
MOTR wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.


I dont know if you fully understand the meaning of 'record'. the current level of net govt debt (in real terms) is the highest in history ergo RECORD. the current deficit is the highest in history in real terms and is also RECORD. no other determination is possible.


Actually as you know Longy you have to compare it to GDP or it means nothing.
You should also add that if we still had Howards record levels of taxation compared to GDP we would be in the black.
The tax cuts and debt were to support the country through the GFC and saved us from joining the rest of the west in what will amount to a decade long recession.
Your pick Longy..10% debt with tax cuts or a long and deep recession.
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #25 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:57am
 
adelcrow wrote on Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:44am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:30am:
MOTR wrote on Apr 4th, 2013 at 3:14am:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:
Not only did the independents allow gillard to sell out the Australian people, they allowed their electorates to gain from it.

In my books, thats bordering on criminal. But let their electorates be happy getting more than other Australians, because they too are enslaved by labor's record debt.


Net debt is about 10% of GDP with interest payments requiring 0.5% of GDP. This is not a record debt level. If we had record debt levels we wouldn't belong to the elite 9As club. You have either been mislead, progs, or you want to mislead others.


I dont know if you fully understand the meaning of 'record'. the current level of net govt debt (in real terms) is the highest in history ergo RECORD. the current deficit is the highest in history in real terms and is also RECORD. no other determination is possible.


Actually as you know Longy you have to compare it to GDP or it means nothing.
You should also add that if we still had Howards record levels of taxation compared to GDP we would be in the black.
The tax cuts and debt were to support the country through the GFC and saved us from joining the rest of the west in what will amount to a decade long recession.
Your pick Longy..10% debt with tax cuts or a long and deep recession.


Actually, we still have howards levels of taxation. the same tax scales for companies, the same tax regime and even income tax is the same since the first tax cut under rudd was actually howards cuts.  what we don't have is the same REVENUE. there were no GFC tax cuts for anyone.

try again.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #26 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 10:01am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 5th, 2013 at 8:57am:
Actually, we still have howards levels of taxation. the same tax scales for companies, the same tax regime and even income tax is the same since the first tax cut under rudd was actually howards cuts.  what we don't have is the same REVENUE. there were no GFC tax cuts for anyone.

try again.


Actually no,  there have been significant tax cuts in income and company tax post-howard.

Howard was the highest taxing government in Australia's history.  A place we do not to go near again.

Howards peak taxation was during the middle of his tenure when he kept outdated tax brackets on a booming economy.  He was very, very slow to act. Criminally slow.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #27 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 10:02am
 

I wish I had an independent as my representative.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59361
Here
Gender: male
Re: Independent MPs win for their electorates
Reply #28 - Apr 5th, 2013 at 10:55am
 
Maqqa wrote on Apr 3rd, 2013 at 9:16pm:
I wonder if there are any proof of these "wins"

These guys are going into an election and they are blamed as an accessory to the carbon tax

What have they got left after being screwed over by Gillard other than exaggerate their benefits



When you look at the original agreement and then look at the claims I rather think it would heve been pointed out by the conservatives if it wasn't true.

I.E. I rather suspect they would notice if the new hospital extension wasn't there or the School expansion didn't happen?

It would be a bit obvious to many of the residents?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print